Nest Book Club
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Goodreads

So, have you guys heard about this author who was bullied on Goodreads? I'm kind of torn about how I feel...

Here's an article explaining what happened.

I think this article hits it right on the head. There was an overreaction by the author AND bullying by Goodreads members. As author Jamie McGuire tweeted Tuesday, “Negative reviews are part of the business. Bullying authors shouldn’t be.” And a community that tolerates the latter in the name of the former is a community that might claim to espouse reading, but one that has a serious comprehension problem.

I haven't even been published yet and I was targeted by a witch hunt group of people, so I know how this girl feels. I had entered my story into Amazon's Breakthrough Novel Contest. It used to be fanfic. I pulled it, worked on it for a year and half and entered it in this contest. I never thought to change the title. That was my naivety. Someone recognized it as a fic, went on Goodreads, added it as a book and then bashed it. They gave it 1 star ratings and got all their lemming followers to do the same. Even put a big badge with skull and crossbones in the reviews that said "THIS WAS FANFIC! DO NOT READ!"

Crazy part? I didn't even know about it.
One of my friends told me, "I added your book to my To Read list."
I was like, "It's not a book and I never added it to Goodreads."

So, yeah, it's disturbing that anyone can go and add YOUR WORK (not even a published book) to Goodreads. And yes, they have the right to rate it however they want. Like the above author...no one had read my book. While I thought it was unfair that this could happen, I didn't lash out. I simply emailed Goodreads and asked them to remove the book. It was taken care of pretty quickly. Unfortunately, this author did not have the same experience.

I know that once my book is published next year, that these same grown-ass women with too much time on their hands will come after me again. And I know that they will give me the same shitty ratings without ever reading my book. Is it fair? No. Is there anything I can do about it? No.

What do you guys think?

I write sexy books. I read all the books. I love dresses & macarons.

image image image 
image image image

Re: Goodreads

  • I think that in a fairly anonymous online system, you have to expect people to leave foolishly meaningless feedback.  I see books I'm interested in all the time that have lots of 1- and 2-star reviews, but I always make it a point to read a few of them to see what they say.  If those reviews have calm and rational reasons for the low rating, I'll take them into account.

    Most of the time they're just general opinions like the reviewer didn't like the characters or had a problem with the amount of sex or adult language.  Perfectly valid reasons to rate a book the way they want, since Goodreads is also about cataloging your own reading activity, but not something I'm going to consider highly in my decision whether or not to read something.

    It's just like dealing with TripAdvisor hotel reviews.  When you're looking for a great family-run budget hotel, you probably don't care about the 1-star review complaining that there was no room service or spa facilities.

    When there's a pile-on, I make a point to figure out what's going on before I accept the general negative consensus.  In cases where the author has clearly bullied the reviewers, I will usually let that sway my opinion and skip the book.  If it's a pile-on for a pile-on's sake, then I take it with a grain of salt.  Is a senseless pile-on fair to the author?  No.  But this is the internet.  The internet loves a good flaming as we had daily proof on the other boards (back when they had people posting).

    I think at the end of the day readers need to be informed and intelligent consumers.
    image
  • An author friend of mine (whose book doesn't release until next year) was recently "1-star bombed" by her estranged husband's family in retaliation for divorcing him. And according to GR's TOS, that's perfectly legit. Now her book has a very solid one star average, and she doesn't even have ARCs yet.

    It's ridiculous.

    I wish they'd allow text-only reviews and suspend ratings until the book is available, kind of similar to Amazon's system. 
    image

    I wrote this! 
  • I wish they'd allow text-only reviews and suspend ratings until the book is available, kind of similar to Amazon's system. 
    I agree with this, I hate seeing books rated by people who clearly haven't read the book.

    I, personally, will do a little extra research on a book I'm interested in but I can see the average GR user passing over a 1-star book w/o a second thought.  
    my read shelf:
    B's book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf)
  • I hate seeing one star reviews from books that haven't been released yet.  I always check the comments and it's usually something either personal about the author or that they didn't like the previous book in a series.  It's totally ridiculous. 

    Same with 5 star ratings beforehand.  It's not a good representation of what people really think of the book.

    I know there has to be a good amount of tough skin for any artist (I include authors in that) since their work is up for debate, there's a difference between a well thought out criticism and vitriolic diarrhea of the mouth.  Unfortunately it's hard to police that.  Hopefully articles like this can get through to a few people, but there will always be those ones who like to make others lives miserable.
    image
    116 books in 2016

    my read shelf:
    Lauren (SnShne322)'s book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf)
    Wes: 10/8/2012


  • That's horrible that those women did that to you!!

    That being said, I'm someone who ignores ratings and reviews on GR until after I've read the book. Especially on books by new or self-published authors. I have nothing against those books, and do read them, but you have to take the reviews and ratings with a grain of salt because you don't know how many are coming from the author's friends, family, enemies, or even the author themself, looking to skew the ratings in either a positive or negative way.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    Anniversary 


    Books Read in 2014: 10 
  • CeeCeeSugaPieCeeCeeSugaPie member
    500 Love Its Fifth Anniversary 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited August 2013

    This is why I seriously try very hard not to read the community reviews on GR, only ones from my friends. If no one I know has read it, then I just go based off of the description, like I did back in "the old days" before GR & eBooks.

    Skeezon, you will have to be sure to let us know when your book gets put on GR for real. All of us NBCers will have to go and cancel out anything those negative hussies post. ;)

     


    image
  • I am one of those that doesn't read reviews before reading the book so I don't have any bias or come across any spoilers.

    I will kick some major a** of anyone who bullies you.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic 
    Sweet babies, you are so very loved.
    Jack 11/29/2009 and Brynne 7/11/2013
  • Most times, I don't add books in advance to my GR lists.  I read them and then add them when I'm going to review.  I rarely use GR for anything else other than recording activity after the fact.  I'm good at ignoring other people's opinions there.

    image

    My favorite Cake Wreck ever.


  • I agree that you should not be able to add the stars until the book as been released.  I am one of the people who read the reviews and the star ratings but I usually take it with a grain of salt and see if I can check what other books that person hated or liked in order to make sure it is a review that I'd even consider.  I do this even with Nesties that I'm GR friends with; if they love a book, I see what other books they love.  Life is too short to read a bad book.

    I also feel that not just anyone should be able to add a book to GR but I'm not sure how the vetting process would go.

    image

    Nicolle's book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf)

     

  • I have always felt like the GR comment section is nothing but the devil's work. I use GR to keep track of books I want to read and I usually find out about those books from tons of other sources. When I do read the comments it's usually for entertainment and I almost always find myself becoming outraged and ready to cutabitch before I've read too many.

    I'm assuming (since we go back a ways) that your fic was Twilight related. I think we both know the level of effing crazy that is associated with that fandom. I mean, EL James is a millionaire FFS, if that's not the most insane thing ever I don't know what is. I'm sorry you were caught up in it and it's not reflection of you as a person or as a writer. I think most people on GR who have the sense God gave a lemon will realize that as well.

    image
  • That sucks that those women did that to you!  I can't believe there are people like that with nothing better to do. How pathetic on their part.
    Kristen's book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf)

    image

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • I agree with everyone. I don't read reviews until after I've read the book because I'm so worried about spoilers. I only use the star ratings when I can't decide between two books at all and I use the highest star rating as a tie-breaker. I intend to read both, but it just helps me pick.

    I didn't realize how much controversy there is over some of these reviews. I don't think I've ever come across a review that was purposefully hateful or mean, with the exception of one. I remember one review that was one star where the person said they hated the book and the author was obviously terrible at writing. There were no specifics, no explanations, etc. It turned out to be a good book.
    image
  • ewill7911ewill7911 member
    100 Comments 25 Love Its Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited August 2013
    Thats horrible. I like the rating system for myself, but I dont want to leave an author a 1 star review and say they suck. I am not creative enough to imagine a whole story for a book then have the guts to publish it so why would I be cruel to someone that is. This makes me sad. I like to give and to get constructive criticism, but thats defiantly not it.  :(
    ~E~
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards