October 2012 Weddings
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

QOTD 9/10

Do you think the NFLs response to domestic violence is justified especially in the Ray Rice case?

Note: Ray Rice from the Balitmore Ravens punched his then fiancé now wife in the face and she was knocked unconscious. It was all on film and it happened in February. The Ravens suspended him for 2 games when they saw only a portion of the video (not where he punched her). The Ravens recently saw the entire video after TMZ got ahold of it. They have since released him from his contract and the NFL suspended him indefinitely. Google got more news.
my read shelf:
Cathy (CathyL7910)'s book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf)

Re: QOTD 9/10

  • Yes.  More than justified.
    image
  • catwinecatwine member
    250 Love Its 500 Comments Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited September 2014
    It sounds terrible but I don't really see how someone's personal life is their employers business.  Unless of course, said person signed a legally binding agreement to promote  a positive self image and then does something like that.   

    BUT I think he deserves to be fired.  Athletes and any public figure are looked up to by young kids and they need to be positive role models or some kid might grow up thinking it's okay to hit a woman.

    ETA: I live under a big ol' Canadian rock with no TV news so this is the first I'm hearing of this situation.
    Daisypath Anniversary tickersimage
  • If you are a celebrity you can't behave like that and expect no consequences.  Your career is strongly dependent on the public's opinion.

    What upsets me about this whole thing is what I'm hearing come out of people's mouths about the situation.  Somehow a lot of people are turning this all around on her.  It just shows the stigma/ignorance that goes along with domestic abuse.  How can people blame the victim?  Also those that make comments about how she married him or whatever, she's a battered woman.  Do research on what that means before you comment on her choices.  \rant.

  • ^^^Ditto.

    The whole situation is completely disgusting.




    image
  • Personal lives may or may not be an employer's business.  In the case of the NFL and Ray Rice, according to the US Constitution at least, this is their business.

    Sep
    09

    Ray Rice And All Other NFL Players Gave Up Their Due Process Rights

    By Darren Heitner | HeadlineNFL PlayersSports Law

    2 Comments

    By Charles Bennett, J.D.

    Ray Rice. Photo Credit: Evan Habeeb-USA TODAY Sports.

    Ray Rice. Photo Credit: Evan Habeeb-USA TODAY Sports.

    Ray Rice is not guaranteed Due Process of law with respect to the termination of his NFL contract. Earlier this week the Baltimore Ravens terminated Ray Rice’s contract after a video surfaced apparently showing him hitting his then-fiancée. The NFL quickly responded by indefinitely suspending Rice.

    All of this came shortly after commissioner Roger Goodell announced a new policy to strengthen domestic violence penalties against players. The NFL Players Association objected to the stricter penalties on the grounds that they denied players Due Process of law. While the NFLPA is free to demand rules that protect the Due Process rights of NFL players, the players have already given up many of their Due Process rights in their contracts.

    Every NFL player, including Ray Rice, signs a contract with the league that includes an arbitration provision. The arbitration provision prevents players from filing lawsuits against the NFL or NFL franchises for disputes arising from their contracts. Instead, the players’ contracts and the NFL’s Collective Bargaining Agreement require the players to participate in an arbitration proceeding to resolve their disputes. The NBA and MLB have similar arbitration provisions in their contracts and CBAs. The arbitration provision agreed to by the players gives up many of their Due Process rights with respect to disputes over their contracts––including termination.

    Constitutional Due Process protections do not extend to private conduct. Since the late 1800’s, in a line of cases called the Civil Rights Cases, the US Supreme Court has held that the Due Process requirements of the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments offer no shield against private conduct. The question is whether the conduct in question is “fairly attributable” to the state.

    There is no doubt that the NFL and its franchises are private entities and not affiliated with any government. Any action taken by the NFL or its franchises is likely not “fairly attributable” to any state. This even applies to the arbitrations the players have elected to use to resolve their disputes.

    Numerous courts around the country have repeatedly held that the no state action is involved in private arbitration. Arbitration between private entities, including between an employer and its employees, is conducted pursuant to contract by a private arbitrator. And even though Congress, in the exercise of its commerce power, provides some governmental regulation of private arbitration agreements via the Federal Arbitration Act, courts have repeatedly held that private arbitration proceedings do not meet the state action requisite for a constitutional Due Process claim.

    All of this means that, even though Rice has not been convicted of domestic violence for his apparent actions against his then-fiancée, the Ravens may terminate Rice’s contract and the NFL may suspend Rice indefinitely without providing him Due Process of law.

    image
  • I think they are justified and agree with everything @goatlady12‌ said about how it's disgusting how many people are blaming her. I do think the NFL purposely didn't look into the matter more initially, when he got the 2 game suspension, and I think that is disgusting too.

    image
  • I'll also add that your personal life becomes your employers business when you represent the brand/organization. Rice represented the NFL and the NFL doesn't want to be seen as promoting domestic violence. They had every right to fire him. Also, I'm sure there's a provision in an NFL contact that says something to that effect. 



    image
  • Totally justifiable.  He is a public figure, and needs to act as such.  I was told I could get my clearance suspended for domestic violence issue.  No clearance, no job.

    Living in MD, this is THE talk right now.  I've somehow managed NOT to see the video, I don't want to. 

    What I get from Raven fans -  they didn't think the incident was "that bad" because she married him afterwards.  Therefore the 2 game suspension was "good enough".  Especially since the one game is against their biggest rivals the Steelers.  Now the video came and it was "that bad".  I know my H was rethinking his loyalty with the team after seeing it... he has 0 tolerance for a man hitting a woman, to the point of stepping in if it's done in public.  He was very happy with them releasing Rice from his contract.  if Rice played, H didn't think the team would block for him.  At least H wouldn't have.

    Since the release, restaurants and bars in the area are giving away free food if you trade in your rice jersey.  I think the team is offering exchanges on the licensed jerseys.  Seems like they are trying to make up for the lapse in judgment.  Honestly, I don't know if they saw the video before now, but they are making things right now.  These are big men, paid to be strong and powerful... there needs to be consequences for ANY violence. 

    I watched my sister in a horrible emotionally, physically and sexually abusive relationship for 14 years. It's awful to see someone you love in that position and not think they can get out.  She finally did about 6 years ago, but it was after many attempts... and many times me begging her to leave because I was afraid he'd kill her.  I pray for the victim and she finds the strength to know she deserves better.

    Eliza Mae - September 16th, 2014

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPicImage and video hosting by TinyPic
  • I guess I need to watch the news more often. I had no clue this was happening. 

    I'm disgusted. The NFL is justified in their response. 

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
    image

  • I completely support their decision and agree with the prior posts about the ideas of imagery as a brand, etc.
    Anniversary
    image
  • He's lucky that all he got was fired.

    photo eaedf6b0-2fd0-4842-9398-1728a558a05f_zpsec80cf50.jpg


    Anniversary

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker 

  • I think that he should have been fired.  He really hit her hard.   I've only read about this, I haven't watched the video.  I know they're saying she initiated and spin in his face, but when did it become ok to hit back?  I get that they were probably drinking, but when she spit and hit him, he should have been responsible and walked away.  If she was hitting him, I could understand if he restrained her, but not punch her with full force.

    I don't think they should have gotten married.  Obviously, there are  issues on both sides that need to be worked out.
  • Firing him is a start, but he should be in JAIL for assault!
    October 2012 December Siggy - A Favorite Wedding Photo image
  • I saw the video and I don't think I saw her spit on him.  It's an elevator video so it's hard to tell what exactly happens.  He hit her so hard!!  His reaction was not justified even if she did spit on him.
  • I haven't looked it up, but I heard because she married him he didn't have charges pressed against him.  @ramstein1027 - legal thoughts?
    Eliza Mae - September 16th, 2014

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPicImage and video hosting by TinyPic
  • A prosecutor can choose to file charges if they want, that's called prosecutorial discretion.  But, in these kinds of cases, the wife says she doesn't want charges filed, that means they're not going to get a lot of cooperation and maybe no evidence, so it will be a wash anyhow.  It sucks.  Prosecutors want to go after those guys but the women (for many justified reasons) can't or won't cooperate.

    He committed a battery on camera ("any unlawful touching of the person of another by the aggressor himself, or by a substance put in motion by him").  But his attorney can file a motion to dismiss the video evidence, will make every objection in the book during voire dire (because how are they going to find an unbiased juror in this kind of case), and to top it off, the wife won't cooperate.  That's a lot of strikes against the prosecution, who already has a very high burden of proof (beyond a reasonable doubt, here in the US).

    My guess is that he will be arrested, maybe get some probation, but won't go to trial.  In a few years, he might even make a Michael Vick-style come-back.  
    image
  • I think they were completely justified. I have seen the video, and if they're saying that they had only seen the part where she was unconscious prior to this last week, they still should have let him go. The police were involved, there would have been a report, I assume. Would they not have gotten the report, seen her being dragged out of the elevator, and not put two and two together? It makes me sick. My heart goes out to her and I hope she can get the help she needs and deserves. 
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers 
    image
    image

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards