Buying A Home
Dear Community,
Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.
If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.
Thank you.
Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.
Lots of home or location?
DH and I will begin the home-buying process this spring, however, we first need to agree on a location in which we're searching. We live in a HCOL area. If we buy a house 45min from the city (1 hour commute to my job), we can afford a bigger home with some land. I would love that but don't think I'm willing to do an hour commute everyday given I have a baby that I want to get home to. Alternatively, a home closer to our jobs would be more modest or probably a townhouse. Not ideal but it is what it is. Just curious what others' think or if you've had the same dilemma (and what did you decide?) Thanks!
Re: Lots of home or location?
For me, my time and keeping my aggravation levels down is more important than a bigger/better house. Though that is making the assumption that the smaller/closer house is still at least something I would be happy living in for at least the next 5 years or so.
I had a similar choice to make when I bought my first home. I could buy either a pretty awesome and luxurious house in a decent area, a similarly sized house to what I have now (for just my living space) in a "hot" and awesome area, or I could buy a duplex in a decent area. Which would mean both a not as optimal living space for myself AND a not as optimal area. But some kick**s monthly cash flow.
I went with the duplex and its monthly cash flow...but even my portion of the house is something I am primarily happy with and plan to live in for at least the next 5+ years. I may never leave, lol.
A larger house is more space to heat, cool, (more cost) as well as more to furnish and clean.
I would opt for a house closer to work that is adequate, but not necessarily your ideal.
It is all about your priorities.
We bought a house much less than what we can afford (used only one income) in order to fund other priorities.
If you value your time as well as time with family - there is nothing wrong with going with a smaller house. You do not have to keep up with anyone else's choices or preferences. This is YOUR life - so live it as you will with NO explanations needed. Just because you can buy a bigger, better house - does not mean that you should by a bigger better house.
We bought it, and we love it. We've talked several times about how much we love being so close to everything (which is something that we initially didn't put a lot of value in). The area still isn't ideal, but once you buy your home, you can either focus on things that you love about it, or focus on things that you hate about it.
Try to imagine how you will use the house.
If you: detest the idea of exterior home maintenance or yard care, prefer quick commutes to work or other areas around the city, plan on keeping your family fairly small, and know that you will always work in the city - then a smaller home or townhouse within the city is a good idea.
If you: Plan on growing your family quite a bit, expect to frequently host many out-of-town guests, want to do a lot of gardening and love to landscape, don't mind long commutes, or could potentially move your job into your home or near your home - then the a larger home farther away is a good idea.
Alternatively, if you move out of the city, but stick with a modest home, could you afford to pay for it on only one income? If there is any appeal to paying off your house quickly, or saving up to buy a second home to rent out the other, this could be an option.