Money Matters
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Opinions wanted: severance vs. stipend

Hi all,

A friend of mine is about to be laid off (amicably) from a government job and has two options:

  1. Take a severance package of approx. $50,000 and leave his job within two weeks.
  2. Leave his job in 6 weeks and receive a "severance" stipend of approx. $250 per month and retain full health insurance coverage indefinitely.

That is the essence of both options without getting into the nitty gritty. He asked me what I would do and I've been wavering back and forth. I would personally take option #1 because I can easily get health insurance coverage through my H's plan and I don't have pre-existing conditions or costly prescriptions that would complicate things. Also, this option is just so much more money up front which is appealing investment-wise. Option #2 was appealing to me because it allows more time for job searching and planning in general plus there's the guaranteed monthly check. I think he's leaning towards option #1 because he shouldn't have much trouble finding a new job. Also worth noting that I have no idea how taxes play into either of these options.

Since I'm really indecisive about this I'm curious to see what MM thinks. I'll update once he makes his decision.

Also, this topic reminded me of a chat I had with my H last week about whether we would do a lump sum payment or lifetime installments if we ever won the lottery. I think we both decided on lump sum unless there's a way to put the lifetime installments into a trust or turn them over to a descendant when we die.

 

 image

image

Re: Opinions wanted: severance vs. stipend

  • A lump sum is likely to be taxed at a super high rate (think close to 40% or so), even so that is going to be $25,000+ available to him immediately (assuming worst case scenario of 50% taxes).

    $250 a month and medical benefits doesn't seem like it would be the equivalent at all.  It would take several years to come close to netting the same amount and if the company goes bankrupt or is sold the money and insurance could stop.

    If your friend is fairly confident of finding a new job quickly I would take the lump sum.  Keep in mind that that severance will prevent him from drawing any unemployment until it runs out (and they consider the full amount, not what he gets to keep).
    Formerly AprilH81
    photo composite_14153800476219jpg

  • is your friend married? do they have an option to get onto someone else's health insurance? With the ACA they shouldn't be denied coverage for pre-existing conditions. 

    the $250/month would get them only $3000/year, it would take almost 17 years to reach the $50K offered in the lump sum. 

    what are their prospects for finding a new job?

    Me: 28 H: 30
    Married 07/14/2012
    TTC #1 January 2015
    BFP! 3/27/15 Baby Girl!! EDD:12/7/2015
  • @ AprilZ81 Thanks for weighing in on the taxes and lack of access to unemployment, I didn't realize that but hopefully those are all the questions that he's asking prior to signing anything. I agree with what you said though, the lump sum seems like the way to go.

    @formerlyGDaisy09 He's not married, so no he won't have access to health care through a spouse. I'm not completely sure of his medical health so this might be a bigger factor to him than it seems to me. He has contacted a few head hunting firms just to review his resume and says that there's a strong demand for his skill set (technology engineering) but it's hard to gauge exactly how quickly he could be placed somewhere until he starts applying and interviewing.

    Thanks for the responses, I think he has until the end of the week to choose but I already gave him my two cents. I knew you guys would have good perspectives on this :)

     image

    image

  • hoffsehoffse member
    Sixth Anniversary 2500 Comments 500 Love Its Name Dropper
    I'd go with lump sum, even with the big tax withholdings.  If he's below the 25% bracket, he should be getting a good bit of it back next spring when he files his 2015 tax return.  Obviously that doesn't help him in the short-term, but it won't be gone forever.

    Lottery: It's actually not as cut and dry as you think.  One of the tax partners I work for had a client win the lottery, and the client hired him to figure out which choice was more tax-advantaged.  He said that if the rates never change, the annuity actually works out to be a better deal.  He did figure in average rates of return for investment, and he said the annuity always wins.

    But that assumes the tax rates stay the same for 30 years, and it assumes average investments.  I think tax rates will go up - possibly by a LOT for high-income taxpayers - so I would probably take the lump sum to lock in the current tax rate. 

    It will also depend on which state you live in when you win - and whether you plan to move to a state with a lower or higher income tax in the near future.

    **Note - I've never run the calculations myself, and it's definitely not legal advice.  This is just a fun story from around the office :)  Everybody I know says to take the lump sum except for that one partner who actually had to do the math once.  He's the lone champion for the annuity.

    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • hoffsehoffse member
    Sixth Anniversary 2500 Comments 500 Love Its Name Dropper
    Oh I forgot to add the biggest reason I would take the lump sum - I don't trust them to have the money 30 years from now when they're still supposed to be paying out.  Give it to me now, all upfront.
    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • Xstatic3333Xstatic3333 member
    2500 Comments 500 Love Its Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited June 2015
    Another vote for lump sum and getting right on an ACA plan. The news that preexisting conditions don't disqualify you from ACA plans hasn't trickled down to everyone yet, but it's been lifesaving for a couple of friends of mine with chronic conditions who were finally able to pursue career positions and leave the jobs their health insurance was attached to.
  • csuavecsuave member
    Seventh Anniversary 500 Comments 250 Love Its Name Dropper

    Lump sum.

    The other option does have some appeal however.

    H's lump sum prevented him from getting hardly any unemployment.  From what I understand, it made him look like he earned most of his wages in a certain part of the year (like a seasonal worker) and he was denied benefits for 2015.  He lost his job Feb of '14 and was able to collect a little at the end of the year when his eligibility started but then was denied when he reapplied in 2015.  I think his eligibility was way delayed too because of the lump sum.

  • Lump sum.

    With ACA, he can purchase health insurance immediately after losing his position (it's considered a life event).  If hes easily employable, then this is a win win in his case.  Get health insurance for the interim period, find a new job, then chuck all of that money toward paying off debt (if he has any).

    TTC since 1/13  DX:PCOS 5/13 (long, anovulatory cycles)
    Clomid 50mg 9/13 = BFP! EDD 6/7/14 M/C 5w6d Found 11/4/13
    1/14 PCOS / Gluten Free Diet to hopefully regulate my system. 
    Chemical Pregnancy 03/14
    Surprise BFP 6/14, Beta #1: 126 Beta #2: 340  Stick baby, stick! EDD 2/17/15
    Riley Elaine born 2/16/15

    TTC 2.0   6/15 
    Chemical Pregnancy 9/15 
    Chemical Pregnancy 6/16
    BFP 9/16  EDD 6/3/17
    Beta #1: 145 Beta #2: 376 Beta #3: 2,225 Beta #4: 4,548
    www.5yearstonever.blogspot.com 
                        Image and video hosting by TinyPic

  • Lump sum vote here!  We are on ACA and that's what your friend could get on immediately although keep in mind that he has to report is current AGI which the 50k can play into.  I'm having issues with the market place right now.  They cancelled our coverage and didn't even notify us all because they misspelled my last name wrong 1.5 years ago when we got on the policy.  I did drop a couple F bombs on the phone with them to get it expedited.  I guess they had a lot of fraud last year.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Another for the lump sum here. Even more so if it looks like he may be hired elsewhere soon!

    Anniversary
    Love: March 2010   Marriage: July 2013   Debt Free: October 2014   TTC: May 2015
  • hoffse said:
    I'd go with lump sum, even with the big tax withholdings.  If he's below the 25% bracket, he should be getting a good bit of it back next spring when he files his 2015 tax return.  Obviously that doesn't help him in the short-term, but it won't be gone forever.

    Lottery: It's actually not as cut and dry as you think.  One of the tax partners I work for had a client win the lottery, and the client hired him to figure out which choice was more tax-advantaged.  He said that if the rates never change, the annuity actually works out to be a better deal.  He did figure in average rates of return for investment, and he said the annuity always wins.

    But that assumes the tax rates stay the same for 30 years, and it assumes average investments.  I think tax rates will go up - possibly by a LOT for high-income taxpayers - so I would probably take the lump sum to lock in the current tax rate. 

    It will also depend on which state you live in when you win - and whether you plan to move to a state with a lower or higher income tax in the near future.

    **Note - I've never run the calculations myself, and it's definitely not legal advice.  This is just a fun story from around the office :)  Everybody I know says to take the lump sum except for that one partner who actually had to do the math once.  He's the lone champion for the annuity.

    Haha...I think the first two places I would go if I won millions in the lottery is 1) An accountant to guide me with the tax implications and annuity vs. lump sum and 2) An attorney to find ways to protect my money.  I've also heard that if it is an annuity (may depend on the sweepstakes or lottery) and the winner dies before it is paid out, tough.  Whatever wasn't paid out is forfeited and does not go to the estate/heirs.  But that might be just a rumor.

    @Xstatic3333, so, so true about the preexisting conditions!  I spent close to half my adult life without insurance for my preexisting condition.  I found that most people didn't realize the vast majority of group plans would not cover a preexisting condition for the first year of coverage unless there was a less than 30 day lapse in coverage.  And for the periods of time when I was unemployed?  Outside of COBRA, I couldn't buy medical insurance for anything, at any price.  Not even just a major medical plan.  I know ACA is very controversial and it has its problems too.  But I lived the alternative and it was ugly and pure evil.  (Slowly stepping back off the soapbox).

  • I vote lump sum. Also, he should still have the option to pay for COBRA, right? And with COBRA you don't have to decide right away, so he could back pay in a couple months if he doesn't find a job right away. I believe you can use COBRA for up to a year. That's what I'd recommend since he is pretty employable. 
  • You can use COBRA fro 18 months, but I would recommend ACA instead as COBRA is hella expensive. The only way I was able to stay on COBRA back in 2010 was because 65% of it was government subsidized.  My parents COBA was 1k for the 2 of them last year.  No one should be paying a mortgage payment in health insurance.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • hoffse said:
    I'd go with lump sum, even with the big tax withholdings.  If he's below the 25% bracket, he should be getting a good bit of it back next spring when he files his 2015 tax return.  Obviously that doesn't help him in the short-term, but it won't be gone forever.

    Lottery: It's actually not as cut and dry as you think.  One of the tax partners I work for had a client win the lottery, and the client hired him to figure out which choice was more tax-advantaged.  He said that if the rates never change, the annuity actually works out to be a better deal.  He did figure in average rates of return for investment, and he said the annuity always wins.

    But that assumes the tax rates stay the same for 30 years, and it assumes average investments.  I think tax rates will go up - possibly by a LOT for high-income taxpayers - so I would probably take the lump sum to lock in the current tax rate. 

    It will also depend on which state you live in when you win - and whether you plan to move to a state with a lower or higher income tax in the near future.

    **Note - I've never run the calculations myself, and it's definitely not legal advice.  This is just a fun story from around the office :)  Everybody I know says to take the lump sum except for that one partner who actually had to do the math once.  He's the lone champion for the annuity.

    Haha...I think the first two places I would go if I won millions in the lottery is 1) An accountant to guide me with the tax implications and annuity vs. lump sum and 2) An attorney to find ways to protect my money.  I've also heard that if it is an annuity (may depend on the sweepstakes or lottery) and the winner dies before it is paid out, tough.  Whatever wasn't paid out is forfeited and does not go to the estate/heirs.  But that might be just a rumor.

    @Xstatic3333, so, so true about the preexisting conditions!  I spent close to half my adult life without insurance for my preexisting condition.  I found that most people didn't realize the vast majority of group plans would not cover a preexisting condition for the first year of coverage unless there was a less than 30 day lapse in coverage.  And for the periods of time when I was unemployed?  Outside of COBRA, I couldn't buy medical insurance for anything, at any price.  Not even just a major medical plan.  I know ACA is very controversial and it has its problems too.  But I lived the alternative and it was ugly and pure evil.  (Slowly stepping back off the soapbox).

    I understand your soapbox :)  I got a hernia when I was pregnant with DD and wanted to get it operated on a year before I really did but it was considered a "pre existing" condition.  Jerks!  They paid for it anyway once that clause went away I signed on up for that surgery.  I think it's the best thing that has happened in obama's terms
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Another vote for Lump Sum. I'm sorry but I don't trust the government and wouldn't trust that the medical and $250.00 a month would last. I know for me, having the $50,000 right now (even with putting half away for taxes) would allow me to function better now and cover all my current bills while job hunting better then $250.00 a month would.
  • I'm really curious about what government branch is giving $50k severance packages... I'm a fed and that sounds really odd to me.
  • RosieC18 said:

    I'm really curious about what government branch is giving $50k severance packages... I'm a fed and that sounds really odd to me.

    The state H works for does stuff like that from time to time.
  • I'm going to say take the lump sum too because I don't trust anyone to pay over that long of a period. But also warn your friend about what it means for unemployment if he's planning to get it. When my dad got a severance package it counted as income and delayed his unemployment by maybe 6 months. For my parents who live pay check to pay check this was a huge hit because I believe they counted the pre-tax amount as income, but he had a lot of taxes out when he got the pay out. This may or may not happen for your friend, but is definitely something he should take into consideration.

     

  • @RosieC18 He works under the DOE.

     

    Thanks everyone for the responses. He's meeting with HR this morning to discuss his options in more detail, but going into that meeting I know he was leaning towards the lump sum. I passed on the info about taxes and how unemployment could be affected and that was eye opening to him as well so again, thanks for the great insight!

     image

    image

  • Ditto lump sum. Take all/everything you can get now. Anything else could disappear due to politics or the economy.
  • I vote take the lump sum. It sounds like he is in a high demand field. Is he willing to move/travel? That might affect how long it takes to find another job.
  • UPDATE:

    My friend agreed to take the lump sum severance payment and leave his job right after 4th of July. He didn't mention what the exact amount was (they have a long formula they use to compute it with some percentage of his base salary, length of tenure at the job, etc.) so I figure its still ~$50,000. He did say they told him to expect it to be heavily taxed upon payment, but that he can expect to see a lot of it back in his tax return. They also gave him the opportunity to directly contribute a portion of it pre-tax to his Traditional IRA.

    As far as healthcare coverage goes, he will be covered for the month of July through his current plan for prescriptions but not for any inpatient appointments.

    On the bright side, he said has two job interviews lined up for the next couple of weeks so he seems like a happy camper. This was definitely unexpected for him but it might end up being an awesome (and MM!) deal at a fresh start.

     image

    image

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards