Money Matters
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

NMM - Appropriate amount of time at new job before TTC?

Hey guys!

What do you think is an appropriate amount of time to be at a new job before you start TTC? I know you have to be there at least a year to qualify for FML (so that would be 3 months before TTC with a normal healthy pregnancy). But how long would you wait for cultural reasons (to ensure you have a good reputation and ppl know you do a good job, etc.)?

I'm looking at beginning TTC at the 6 month mark on my new job, and I'm a little nervous about it. I feel like I have a good feel for my job, have made some good contributions, and built up a good reputation thus far. I work for a non-profit that really values work-life balance, so I don't think it would be a big deal. Still... I worry about it coming across as non-professional to get pregnant too soon on the job (and just typing that seems completely ridiculous.)

Re: NMM - Appropriate amount of time at new job before TTC?

  • Do you plan on returning to work after the baby is born?
    HeartlandHustle | Personal Finance and Betterment Blog  
  • Absolutely! 100%

  • I would like to stay at this job for 5-10 years at least.
  • What you are describing would be more than respectable in my field (non-profit).  

    I get a little punchy about this issue, but I really think employers, and our country as whole, need to stop seeing women having babies as an inconvenience and accept it as a natural part of life.  I think our policies in this area are holding us back as a nation.  Hopefully your employer isn't like that and will be supportive of you professionally taking a maternity leave, but it drives me bonkers when they aren't.  I've seen friends have a tough time with this, and I do understand it is a reality we need to deal with right now, but I hope it changes.  

    Congrats on the new job!
  • I would like to stay at this job for 5-10 years at least.

    As long as you plan to go back, I think waiting six months is fine.
    HeartlandHustle | Personal Finance and Betterment Blog  
  • I think 6 months is fine.  I wouldn't put off TTC just because of a job - but that's me.  
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • We are TTC right now and I'm in the middle of job hunting.  Depending on your age it isn't smart to wait anyway...

    It sucks that this even has to be a consideration but I'm past the point of caring.  If I get a new job they can't fire me because I get pregnant and while I wouldn't be eligible for FLMA it really doesn't matter.  FLMA only means they have to hold your job you don't get any "benefit" from it.  

    Six months before TTC is plenty in my mind, even if you get pregnant immediately.
    Formerly AprilH81
    photo composite_14153800476219jpg

  • I think 6 months is plenty of time. 

    FMLA issues in general make me a bit angry right now. I'm so glad my immediate boss has been so wonderful about this whole thing, but I do get the sense that a few people under me are seeing this pregnancy as an opportunity to try to permanently take over some of my job responsibilities (thankfully my boss sees through it and assures me my position is more than safe). 

    General policies in this country are not family friendly. my employer offers the minimum 6 weeks time for maternity leave and they do pay for that time, and grants an extra 2 weeks of disability if you have a C-section. A friend of mine just had an emergency C-section and said that the hastle of all the paperwork and lining up that disability was almost not worth the extra 2 weeks. I'm banking my vacation time in hopes of taking an extra week or two, but if LO ends-up in group daycare my vacation time is also my "home with a sick kid" time. I'm definitely in a "good" situation as far as Mat Leave is concerned, but I also hate that 6 weeks paid leave is considered good!  H on the other hand gets 4 days of Paternity leave, which includes whatever time he's in L&D with me. 
    Me: 28 H: 30
    Married 07/14/2012
    TTC #1 January 2015
    BFP! 3/27/15 Baby Girl!! EDD:12/7/2015
  • I agree with the other PPs.  You should start TTC whenever it is best for you, though I'd wait until you'd be eligible for TTC to make sure they are required to hold your job.

    While pregnancy shouldn't matter and IS legally a protected class, we all know that some company cultures might still frown on it.  With that said, when my husband and I were first dating, his company hired an accountant who was six months pregnant, and obviously pregnant, at the time she was hired.  My esteem for them went up.

    On a different side note, another similar protected class is reserved duty soldiers who are called back to active duty.  We had a really ugly incident at a previous company I worked for.  It was a defense contractor.  We had a contract that was coming to an end and all the employees on it knew their days were numbered.  "Magically" one of the guys was called back to active duty about ten days before everyone on the project was told their last day...which was a couple weeks out and he'd already be back on active duty.

    Companies are only required to hold a job that exists, they are not required to pay you.  But this particular company...for ONE YEAR...was generous enough to pay him the difference between his normal salary and his army salary.  This guy actually had the NERVE to come back and expect the company to employ him, even though he knew his old job had long been eliminated and we didn't have another position available for him.  He even threatened to sue if we didn't take him back on.  It wasn't even my money or my company, but I still get mad when I think about that jerk.

    They caved and took him back on.  Except we had nothing for him to do.  My boss was furious and, in a way, made his job kind of hellish.  He was occasionally given mundane office jobs if we had some, but spent most of his day sitting at his computer.  Except no internet for personal use and that was heavily checked.  He spent most of his days with nothing to do except stare at the wall for 8 hours.  But it worked.  It motivated him to send some resumes out and a month later he was hired on by someone else.   

  • Wow. What perfect timing.  I've been going back and forth about this recently, too!!

    DH and I were planning on TTC starting this month until certain situations at work have encouraged me to find a new job ASAP.  There are 3 potential jobs that I'm in the running for, one of them being a really promising position at a company I previously worked for.  We decided to hold off on TTC until we know what happens with these positions.  If I get hired in the next few months, we'll wait another 4-5 months to TTC.  If all of these opportunities fall through and I have to go back to the drawing board, we'll start TTC right away and see what happens. 


    Married 5.7.11 | Me: 31 | DH: 32
    TTC Countdown to 8/2015

    image
    image
  • @juliebeannn - Good luck with your new job hunt and TTC!  A few months back, I thought about staying at my old job until after we have a baby, just so I would be more settled. Now I am so glad we didn't do that! My new job is 100 times better than the old one, and who knows how long it will take us to get pg.

  • @juliebeannn - Good luck with your new job hunt and TTC!  A few months back, I thought about staying at my old job until after we have a baby, just so I would be more settled. Now I am so glad we didn't do that! My new job is 100 times better than the old one, and who knows how long it will take us to get pg.

    This is exactly what I was thinking.  My work situation was tolerable, and since I've been here for a while, mat leave would've been mostly paid and 12 weeks, so considered staying until after I have a baby.  But, my boss gave his notice and is leaving at the end of August and the transition plan is pretty awful, so that accelerated things a bit. Thanks!! 

    Hope when you guys decide to start TTC, things go quickly and smoothly!!! :D
    Married 5.7.11 | Me: 31 | DH: 32
    TTC Countdown to 8/2015

    image
    image
  • I would say however long you need to be at the company to qualify for FMLA and if offered, short/long term disability. That way if you have any complications and have to be on bed rest for a portion of your pregnancy, you would still have an income.
  • We don't have plans to have children, but if we did, I really and truly would not even consider my employer's 'feelings' about the matter.  Maybe that's unprofessional?  I think our family decisions are absolutely not our employer's business and wouldn't give it a second thought. 

    We would however plan around getting maximum benefits/paid time off, but that's for our personal benefit, not the employer.

  • We don't have plans to have children, but if we did, I really and truly would not even consider my employer's 'feelings' about the matter.  Maybe that's unprofessional?  I think our family decisions are absolutely not our employer's business and wouldn't give it a second thought. 

    We would however plan around getting maximum benefits/paid time off, but that's for our personal benefit, not the employer.


    ...and you wonder why employers don't want to hire women who are planning on having children.

    The work needs to get done, whether you're there or not. I suppose The Bank of America or Goldman Sachs has the deep pockets to absorb the loss, but for a smaller business, it really, really hurts.




  • We don't have plans to have children, but if we did, I really and truly would not even consider my employer's 'feelings' about the matter.  Maybe that's unprofessional?  I think our family decisions are absolutely not our employer's business and wouldn't give it a second thought. 

    We would however plan around getting maximum benefits/paid time off, but that's for our personal benefit, not the employer.



    ...and you wonder why employers don't want to hire women who are planning on having children.

    The work needs to get done, whether you're there or not. I suppose The Bank of America or Goldman Sachs has the deep pockets to absorb the loss, but for a smaller business, it really, really hurts.





    No. We lag so far behind other developed nations in terms of maternity leave policies that it's ridiculous. No woman who qualifies should ever be made to feel guilty about taking her 12 weeks unpaid FMLA. Or pumping when necessary. The amount of guilt we heap into mothers is crazy, but none of us would be here without one. Child bearing and rearing is a part of life. Small employers (like mine) aren't required to offer any leave but many make do during 6-8 weeks to hold a spot for a good employee.
  • dragonstarjkdragonstarjk member
    Tenth Anniversary 500 Comments 250 Love Its Name Dropper
    edited August 2015

    @dorsiflector--It sort of looks like you created an account just so you could chime in on this issue, which is kind of weird, and I probably should just ignore you.  I will just say that I am happy to work for a company (a SMALL BANK, no less) that supports employees and their family needs, so this would never be an issue. 

    It makes me sad that women in this country have to worry about their jobs or positions within a company simply because they are the gender designed to carry and birth offspring.  GOOD companies and corporations would never make a good employee feel guilty about their family choices, regardless of the size of the business.

  • edited August 2015
    Not sure how it's "kind of weird" to join a forum to respond to a post of interest. Best to avoid name-calling and labeling in the face of a dissenting opinion.

    The fact remains that, when the woman is out on maternity leave, she is not doing her job. Someone else has to fill in, or the work doesn't get done. Why should the employer have to pay for this? Is the person who picks up the slack entitled to double-pay, because they're doing the work of two people? 

    For a small business (other than a bank) it could literally put them out of business.

    Just to be clear, I am not against maternity leave, but I do think that it would be much fairer if all people at a company--pregnant or not, man or woman--had the opportunity for a 3-month leave per year.
  • Not sure how it's "kind of weird" to join a forum to respond to a post of interest. Best to avoid name-calling and labeling in the face of a dissenting opinion.


    The fact remains that, when the woman is out on maternity leave, she is not doing her job. Someone else has to fill in, or the work doesn't get done. Why should the employer have to pay for this? Is the person who picks up the slack entitled to double-pay, because they're doing the work of two people? 

    For a small business (other than a bank) it could literally put them out of business.

    Just to be clear, I am not against maternity leave, but I do think that it would be much fairer if all people at a company--pregnant or not, man or woman--had the opportunity for a 3-month leave per year.
    Men are allowed to take FMLA to care for a new child too, although I think that it is rarely done except when both parents are men. The law also covers time off for your own medical emergency rendering you unfit to work, or for you to care for a seriously ill family member. It doesn't apply to companies with less than 50 employees, so that's not something to dwell on unless there is a specific, stricter law applying to your state.

    Clearly everyone taking three months off a year is ridiculous. New moms are recovering from a medical trauma while working their butts off, not jet setting around Europe.

    Your argument feels personal. Are you a small business owner?
  • Not sure how it's "kind of weird" to join a forum to respond to a post of interest. Best to avoid name-calling and labeling in the face of a dissenting opinion.

    The fact remains that, when the woman is out on maternity leave, she is not doing her job. Someone else has to fill in, or the work doesn't get done. Why should the employer have to pay for this? Is the person who picks up the slack entitled to double-pay, because they're doing the work of two people? 

    For a small business (other than a bank) it could literally put them out of business.

    Just to be clear, I am not against maternity leave, but I do think that it would be much fairer if all people at a company--pregnant or not, man or woman--had the opportunity for a 3-month leave per year.
    There is so much pressure on new and expecting moms, hostility like this from employers is so completely unnecessary. I agree it sounds like you are speaking from personal experience, so let me speak from mine. 

    My husband and I are expecting in December, it does not matter whether the pregnancy was planned. my workplace offers me six weeks of paid time off (8 weeks in the event of a c-section) paid by short-term disability, they then offer two weeks of paid-parental leave that can be added to the maternity leave or taken anytime during the first year of the child's life. Paid parental leave is offered to both men and women and also applies to adoptions (so could be taken anytime during the child's first year in your home). The rest of the 12 weeks of FMLA time is un-paid (either 2 or 4 weeks depending on c-section). 

    Having a baby is a traumatic medical and emotional experience, most new moms return to work exhausted and full of guilt for leaving their infant in the care of someone else.  Most my new mom friends use the final two or three weeks of their leave taking trial periods away from their infant, because they do not want their first 9 hour day back at work to be a day full of tears and worry as they are trying to focus on their job. 

     Even now, approximately 4 months before my baby is due, I find myself spending more time at work preparing for the 8-10 weeks I'll be out of work (we can't afford unpaid leave), my work life will be more organized than it has ever been by this fall so that when my leave begins my essential duties can be managed easily by my coworkers. I also expect that, after the initial few days-to-a week, my boss or coworkers managing my duties may call me with questions, I welcome and expect this as I would not want any of my projects to suffer as a result of my leave. I expect that most women who work in a healthy work environment take the same approach. There is so much extra work involved in both preparing for leave, preparing to return from leave, and actually returning from leave, I'm sure most women wish (on some level) that maternity leave were unnecessary to the process of building a family, and I'm sure most women wish they felt physically and emotionally ready to return to work after 6, 8, or 12 weeks.

    prior to telling work about my pregnancy I was wracked with guilt and anxious about my boss's reaction to the news (thankfully his children are his reason for everything, so I should not have been worried). I was worried and stressed (Hello, not good for the baby), because of people with opinions exactly like yours (in fact there were several doctors discussing how one of the nurses' pregnancies was ill timed for their schedules outside my office just days before I had a positive pregnancy test). 

    I'm sorry if you had a business that failed, and if an employee's maternity leave was one of the many many things that cause the demise of that business. but PLEASE do not blame FMLA for the failure of your business. Pregnancy, for the most part, is a predictable process, most employers have 5-6 monthe to prepare for an employees impending leave time, that is more than adequate as most other disability and family medical leave situations happen suddenly, without warning. 
    Me: 28 H: 30
    Married 07/14/2012
    TTC #1 January 2015
    BFP! 3/27/15 Baby Girl!! EDD:12/7/2015
  • We don't have plans to have children, but if we did, I really and truly would not even consider my employer's 'feelings' about the matter.  Maybe that's unprofessional?  I think our family decisions are absolutely not our employer's business and wouldn't give it a second thought. 

    We would however plan around getting maximum benefits/paid time off, but that's for our personal benefit, not the employer.


    ...and you wonder why employers don't want to hire women who are planning on having children.

    The work needs to get done, whether you're there or not. I suppose The Bank of America or Goldman Sachs has the deep pockets to absorb the loss, but for a smaller business, it really, really hurts.



    No. We lag so far behind other developed nations in terms of maternity leave policies that it's ridiculous. No woman who qualifies should ever be made to feel guilty about taking her 12 weeks unpaid FMLA. Or pumping when necessary. The amount of guilt we heap into mothers is crazy, but none of us would be here without one. Child bearing and rearing is a part of life. Small employers (like mine) aren't required to offer any leave but many make do during 6-8 weeks to hold a spot for a good employee.
    yes yes yes :)  I was just talking to DH about it tonight and we don't see eye to eye on this.  His argument is always that it costs money do get things like that.  I don't and won't ever work corporate gigs but I really wish those that do could have this opportunity at some point.  Especially if you end up with a c/section like I did with DD - even at 8 weeks pp I still didn't quite feel back to myself.  Hoping and praying for a vbac when we give it another try for kid #2 - surgery is no joke.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Not sure how it's "kind of weird" to join a forum to respond to a post of interest. Best to avoid name-calling and labeling in the face of a dissenting opinion.

    The fact remains that, when the woman is out on maternity leave, she is not doing her job. Someone else has to fill in, or the work doesn't get done. Why should the employer have to pay for this? Is the person who picks up the slack entitled to double-pay, because they're doing the work of two people? 

    For a small business (other than a bank) it could literally put them out of business.

    Just to be clear, I am not against maternity leave, but I do think that it would be much fairer if all people at a company--pregnant or not, man or woman--had the opportunity for a 3-month leave per year.


    In a way, I get where you are coming from. I am sympathetic to employers (and the other employees) who have to do extra work to make up for someone who is out on maternity leave. That is why I asked the question... I feel guilty just thinking about how I might go out of work for 3 months after only being at the company for a limited amount of time. Because of that guilt, I'm actually trying to work twice as hard pre-pregnancy to "prove my worth" and make valuable contributions to "make up" for the fact that I am woman and therefore will one day likely be a baby vessel. (This will probably sound horrible to others, but deep down it is how I feel and probably how a lot of others feel.)  If I'm already feeling like this pre-pregnancy, I can't imagine what the guilt must be like post-baby...feeling torn in two directions. Because of that I sympathize with BOTH new moms and the employer.

    You ask if the employer should have to pay for maternity leave, but that really wasn't the question (although there are arguments to be made for that too). FMLA is unpaid, and I don't really expect to receive paid maternity leave. All I really want is 3 months unpaid maternity leave with the ability to come back to my job without judgment or resentment from my employer or coworkers. If I (or anyone else) were to have any other medical emergency, I think this would be a fair thing to expect. As others have pointed out, FMLA doesn't just cover pregnancy...it covers any medical emergency and new dads too!

    I'm really curious what your solution to this problem should be? Should moms and potential moms just stay out of the workforce all together? (If so, employers better be prepared to increase salaries for men, because DH's salary sure wouldn't cut it for a family.) Do you think women should just return to work the day after undergoing a traumatic medical event? Should we just stop having babies and hope that storks will suddenly begin to drop the next generation of humans out of the sky?

  • As someone who is currently doing another person's job (along with my own) while she's out on maternity leave, let me say: it sucks. It sucks really hard most days. I went from working a normal 45-ish hour work week to working a 55-hour work week. By the time she returns, I will have worked 6 days a week for 10 weeks. No, it's not fun. But, that's just the way it is. I am the manager of my location, so that's just the way it goes. While I don't plan on having kids of my own, I think parental leave is so important. It's one thing to acknowledge that the workload sucks for those left behind. It's something completely different to say that there shouldn't be parental leave.

    Employers do all kinds of other things for employee engagement/happiness/wellness, I don't see how parental leave is any different.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards