Nest Book Club
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Writers using strategic pseudonyms to get published

Recently we were talking about female Sci-Fi and Fantasy authors (e.g. J.K. Rowling) using initials or adopting male pens in order to be taken more seriously.

There was a recent post on BuzzFeed discussing a white male author who used an Asian pseudonym to get his poetry published:
In general, there is a lot of negative outcry, accusing him of appropriating Asian culture.

Since we were discussing a related topic recently, I'm curious what people think about this.
image

Re: Writers using strategic pseudonyms to get published

  • GilliCGilliC member
    Ancient Membership 5000 Comments 500 Love Its First Answer
    edited September 2015
    At first, I thought it was a bit despicable, but I struggle to balance this with the concept of swapped gender identities in publishing. There are plenty of women who adopt male pen names to be taken seriously, and a few men who use female names to publish romance. I don't really care about that, so I don't feel like I should consider doing the same thing with ethnicity any differently than I do gender.

    I think the thing that sits uncomfortably with me is that the work was selected for Best American Poetry at least in part due to the perceived race of the author rather than purely for its own merit. (ETA - And that's a problem with the editor, not the author.)

    PS - I'm choosing to ignore the cheeky tweets by the author himself, which I'm pretty sure were a questionable attempt at humor.
    image
  • Honestly, I pay very little attention to an author's gender or race. If it seems like a book I would enjoy based on the description or from recs, I read it. 

     


    image
  • GilliC said:

    I think the thing that sits uncomfortably with me is that the work was selected for Best American Poetry at least in part due to the perceived race of the author rather than purely for its own merit.

    This makes me uncomfortable.  Race and gender should have absolutely nothing to do with awards for writing.  If it was an award for "american poetry," all that should matter is whether the writer is American.  Their race, ethnicity, gender or anything else shouldn't be factors.

    Generally, I'm with PP, and I don't pay much attention to author biographies at all.
  • This is FASCINATING to me.  Not from a perspective of is it right or wrong but from the perspective that it worked.  I've read so much lately about how difficult it is for minority authors to get published.  That writers of color are much less likely to have the same work published than white authors.  In this case it seems like the exact opposite happened.  I wonder if this is related to the fact that he's writing poetry versus prose?  Or if it's a fluke?  Or if the topic of his poem felt more genuine coming from an Asian author?  
    imageimage image
  • Also, if an author of color used a pseudonym (maybe a Jewish sounding name) to get a work published and then publicized the use of the pseudonym in an effort to expose racism in publishing, we wouldn't mind, right?  He's using the poem and pseudonym to make a statement that I find interesting in light of the current talk of diversity in publishing.
    imageimage image
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards