May 2008 Weddings
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

WR question

how would you feel if you were invited to a wedding reception *only* of a family member, and the ceremony is only for immediate family earlier in the day? i.e., you're not invited. would this bother you? more details: you see the person a lot at family functions so you're not like distant family they've never met, but you're not close enough that you call them on the phone and hang out with them by yourself. the immediate family ceremony will be 20 people: parents, siblings, bride and groom, maybe a very close friend or two. the reception is 150 and a lot of that number will be family because both bride and groom have mega families.

another family member and i have very strong viewpoints about this and our opinions are 180 degrees different. i'm trying to understand the other side. one side is: "who cares, whatever the bride wants to do is fine" and the other side is "why are you going to have a wedding if you're not inviting everyone?"

Me:39 Dx LPD, Fibroid, AMA and all that goes with that. H:37 Dx low motility and low morphology. TTC since 3/12. Clomid 8/12 and 9/12: BFN. 11/12 on a break for Myomectomy sched. 11/26. Resume TTC early 2013.

Re: WR question

  • why would you pay for everyone to come to the reception but not the actual wedding!??!
  • I only have 1 example of this.  My cousin got married this year.  She got married in a church that her grandma (on her mom's side) had attended for years.  The church was very tiny, and couldn't hold that many people.  So only parents, grandparents, siblings aunts/uncles and first cousins were invited to the ceremony.  For the most part this wasn't an issue for my extended family.  They were more insulted that they didn't get invited to the bridal shower. 

     I would be on the side of who cares.  Unless someone that was my equal in relationship was invited and I was excluded. 

  • I've had 2 friends do that. Both had a "small" ceremony with family and a few friends, then a reception with more people. I was a bit bothered that I was't invited to the ceremony. It seems better than only being invited for the ceremony though; at least you get fed?

  • imagebuckeyethor:
    why would you pay for everyone to come to the reception but not the actual wedding!??!

    My thoughts exactly!

    I would be torn probably, like you. I can see both sides...I guess it depends on her reasoning. 

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Im team who cares. My bf from high school is getting married at a Justice Of Peace and then later in the week having a reception. I dont see anything wrong with this. Some people want an intimate ceremony but have many people who will want to celebrate the new beginning with them.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • bucks - she wants an intimate ceremony with less hassle. it will save money too. she is getting married at a house on the water. she will save on rentals and it will be casual with just immediate family. she wont do programs, decorations, or a tent in case it rains (she can easily move 20 ppl inside). i think she wants it simple so it can be about her and her h. she also doesnt like being the center of attentiom. both she and her h are shy. i am firmly on the side of who cares? i just want her to do what makes her happy. i am doc so i will be at the receptiom the whole time so mayne it's easy for me to say. this other person (older) is thoroughly incensed and i am having a hard time understanding it. it's not like she is particularly close to the bride. i just keep thinking she should be happy not to have to drive back and forth to the ceremony which is far away.
    Me:39 Dx LPD, Fibroid, AMA and all that goes with that. H:37 Dx low motility and low morphology. TTC since 3/12. Clomid 8/12 and 9/12: BFN. 11/12 on a break for Myomectomy sched. 11/26. Resume TTC early 2013.
  • I know of a few Mormon weddings where not everyone is even allowed during the whole ceremony so most people just go to the reception. I think I would be on team 'who cares' unless it was for an immediate family member.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageMadameD517:
    I know of a few Mormon weddings where not everyone is even allowed during the whole ceremony so most people just go to the reception. I think I would be on team 'who cares' unless it was for an immediate family member.

     This, exactly. Here in Utah that is so standard that people don't even think twice. And most receptions are very large open house style things, with buffet food or often just buffet desserts. 

  • I don't get what's so bothersome about this. People get eloped, and then have a reception later down the line. People get married at a JOP, nd have a reception later down the line. Some people prefer to make a sacred commitment to each other in the company of a select few, and have a reception later down the line. You're invited to share in their happiness.. why do you need to witness the act itself, and not just enjoy the fact that the couple loves each other? Personally, I'm a sucker for a wedding. But I'd never be offended if people want to share something intimate with very few people.
  • I'm also on team 'who cares'. We had friends that got married in really small place and then opened up to a larger place for the reception. It was in Charleston so even having that extra hour in the larger place would have cost them $1000 more and they paid for the wedding themselves. I had no problem going to reception only.
    imageAlways Painted,Usually Chipped Disclaimer - This is not a nail polish blog.
  • image*city bride*:
    I don't get what's so bothersome about this. People get eloped, and then have a reception later down the line. People get married at a JOP, nd have a reception later down the line. Some people prefer to make a sacred commitment to each other in the company of a select few, and have a reception later down the line. You're invited to share in their happiness.. why do you need to witness the act itself, and not just enjoy the fact that the couple loves each other? Personally, I'm a sucker for a wedding. But I'd never be offended if people want to share something intimate with very few people.

    these are my sentiments, exactly. when she said "i guess i'm old fashioned" my response was actually i think this has been happening since the beginning of time (i.e., elopements, etc.) when i told her that the bride doesn't like being the center of attention she was "well why have a wedding at all!!!" she's really over the top about this.

     

    Me:39 Dx LPD, Fibroid, AMA and all that goes with that. H:37 Dx low motility and low morphology. TTC since 3/12. Clomid 8/12 and 9/12: BFN. 11/12 on a break for Myomectomy sched. 11/26. Resume TTC early 2013.
  • imagebuckeyethor:
    why would you pay for everyone to come to the reception but not the actual wedding!??!

    My initial thought exactly.  Brides typically get upset when people only show up to the reception and not the ceremony.

    I think I'd still go, b/c that's the set-up that she wants but it does seem a little "out there" to me. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • My personal deal:  I wouldn't care.

    That said, I guess I can understand how someone would consider the ceremony the most "important" part and feel kind of slighted to be excluded.  Sort of like, you're ok to 'come to the party and bring me a present' but not really a part of my "inner circle".  IDK, I'm probably not doing a super job articulating it, b/c it's not my personal POV, but I think that's probably where your relative is coming from.

    image
  • imageVABeach08:

    My personal deal:  I wouldn't care.

    That said, I guess I can understand how someone would consider the ceremony the most "important" part and feel kind of slighted to be excluded.  Sort of like, you're ok to 'come to the party and bring me a present' but not really a part of my "inner circle".  IDK, I'm probably not doing a super job articulating it, b/c it's not my personal POV, but I think that's probably where your relative is coming from.

    i think this is exactly how she feels - excluded. but i just keep going back to the JOP or eloping example.

     

    Me:39 Dx LPD, Fibroid, AMA and all that goes with that. H:37 Dx low motility and low morphology. TTC since 3/12. Clomid 8/12 and 9/12: BFN. 11/12 on a break for Myomectomy sched. 11/26. Resume TTC early 2013.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards