August 2006 Weddings
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Breaking News: Ted Stevens guilty on all counts

according to CNN.  

Will his seat go to Dems?  

ETA: link to the news in writing http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27398089/

 

Re: Breaking News: Ted Stevens guilty on all counts

  • I'm not surprised.  Bye bye Stevens.

    I'm guessing his seat will go to the Dems.  I don't see how it couldn't.  He's up for re-election, so he'll have to drop out.  I don't think a new Republican could even get on the ballot.

  • imageEastSideFluffy:


    I'm guessing his seat will go to the Dems.  I don't see how it couldn't.  He's up for re-election, so he'll have to drop out.  I don't think a new Republican could even get on the ballot.

    My thoughts exactly. Bad timing for this (well good timing for the Dems). 

  • Thank goodness they didn't fall for that woeful excuse for a defense.
    imageimageBaby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • CNN reporting that its up to the Senate to remove him from his seat, and that this doesn't necessarily mean he's off the ballot (I could have heard that wrong?)... though I seriously have doubts that he could win the seat back after this, even if he can stay on the ballot.  Very good timing for Dems.
  • It's probably too late to take his name off the ballot; they have probably (most definitely) been printed. Presumably, he could still be elected. Then I guess the Senate would have to impeach (?) him and then the state of AK would have to hold a special election. AK voters should just vote in someone else.
  • I am practically falling out of my chair with excitement at how Palin will respond to this. 

    Especially since Stevens claimed that the "gifts" didn't really belong to him, they were just in his home.  Just like she claims her wardrobe doesn't really belong to her, they were just on her body.

     

  • imageEastSideFluffy:

    I am practically falling out of my chair with excitement at how Palin will respond to this. 

    Especially since Stevens claimed that the "gifts" didn't really belong to him, they were just in his home.  Just like she claims her wardrobe doesn't really belong to her, they were just on her body.

     

    I'm also anxious to see SP's response.

  • imageLittleMissWifey:
    It's probably too late to take his name off the ballot; they have probably (most definitely) been printed. Presumably, he could still be elected. Then I guess the Senate would have to impeach (?) him and then the state of AK would have to hold a special election. AK voters should just vote in someone else.

    Actually, a lot of states don't do special elections right away.  In many cases, the governor appoints someone to finish the term or to serve for some period of time until there is a special election (usually whenever the next national election would be, so in this case 2010).

    So if he were elected and kicked out, Palin (or her replacement if MPC wins) would appoint someone.

    But given the narrow hold the Rs have on the Senate right now, I wonder if they will ask him to step down. 

  • imageEastSideFluffy:

    I am practically falling out of my chair with excitement at how Palin will respond to this. 

    Especially since Stevens claimed that the "gifts" didn't really belong to him, they were just in his home.  Just like she claims her wardrobe doesn't really belong to her, they were just on her body.

     

    Was he just going to donate that new deck to charity too? 

  • This is awesome!  I do wonder what Palin will say.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageEastSideFluffy:

    imageLittleMissWifey:
    It's probably too late to take his name off the ballot; they have probably (most definitely) been printed. Presumably, he could still be elected. Then I guess the Senate would have to impeach (?) him and then the state of AK would have to hold a special election. AK voters should just vote in someone else.

    Actually, a lot of states don't do special elections right away.  In many cases, the governor appoints someone to finish the term or to serve for some period of time until there is a special election (usually whenever the next national election would be, so in this case 2010).

    So if he were elected and kicked out, Palin (or her replacement if MPC wins) would appoint someone.

    But given the narrow hold the Rs have on the Senate right now, I wonder if they will ask him to step down. 

    True that. The Gov. usually appoints until a special election can be held. 

  • Here is polling data on the AK senate race; it was a tight race, with the D slightly ahead prior to the guilty verdict. I wonder how much the verdict will tip the scales over for the D.

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/senate/ak/alaska_senate-562.html

  • OK, I didn't hear it wrong.  He does not have to drop out of the race, as there's nothing in the Constitution prohibiting a felon from serving in the Congress.  A 2/3 vote would be required to remove Stevens, should he win re-election. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27398089/

    I have a feeling that he will continue his Senate campaign, and will resign soon after if he were to win.  This would allow SP to appoint a Repub to replace him until the next election in 2010.  There's no way the Republicans are going to give up the seat that easily.

  • The front page of nytimes.com right now has the headline Alaska Senator Is Convicted on Corruption Charges. Right next to it is a picture of McCain speaking at a rally in Ohio. Not such a good visual for MPC. Ouch.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageMrs.tlcS:

    OK, I didn't hear it wrong.  He does not have to drop out of the race, as there's nothing in the Constitution prohibiting a felon from serving in the Congress.  A 2/3 vote would be required to remove Stevens, should he win re-election. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27398089/

    I have a feeling that he will continue his Senate campaign, and will resign soon after if he were to win.  This would allow SP to appoint a Repub to replace him until the next election in 2010.  There's no way the Republicans are going to give up the seat that easily.

    I am not convinced that he will win now though. It was a very tight race to begin with...but if he does win, I think your analysis is correct. 

  • imageLittleMissWifey:
    imageMrs.tlcS:

    OK, I didn't hear it wrong.  He does not have to drop out of the race, as there's nothing in the Constitution prohibiting a felon from serving in the Congress.  A 2/3 vote would be required to remove Stevens, should he win re-election. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27398089/

    I have a feeling that he will continue his Senate campaign, and will resign soon after if he were to win.  This would allow SP to appoint a Repub to replace him until the next election in 2010.  There's no way the Republicans are going to give up the seat that easily.

    I am not convinced that he will win now though. It was a very tight race to begin with...but if he does win, I think your analysis is correct. 

    Interesting.

    If MPC were really about "country first" and cutting down corruption and earmarks, and reform, then I think they'd be putting their country first by urging Alaskans to vote a felon out of office.

    Obama needs to pounce on this one.  It's an easy shot for him.  He helps the Senate and he points out MPC's hypocracy.  There's no downside here.

  • *waiting for the pics of Stevens hugging Palin*

    In 3....2....1....

  • imageMrs.tlcS:

    OK, I didn't hear it wrong.  He does not have to drop out of the race, as there's nothing in the Constitution prohibiting a felon from serving in the Congress.  A 2/3 vote would be required to remove Stevens, should he win re-election. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27398089/

    pssst, founding fathers? This was a bad oversight. FAIL

    imageimageBaby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageLittleMissWifey:

    *waiting for the pics of Stevens hugging Palin*

    In 3....2....1....

    Haha, good call.  There's already one of Stevens and Palin together over on E08, with the comment "Palin pals around with cons" in this thread http://community.thenest.com/cs/ks/forums/thread/4883327.aspx

  • imageMrs.tlcS:
    imageLittleMissWifey:

    *waiting for the pics of Stevens hugging Palin*

    In 3....2....1....

    Haha, good call.  There's already one of Stevens and Palin together over on E08, with the comment "Palin pals around with cons" in this thread http://community.thenest.com/cs/ks/forums/thread/4883327.aspx

    Ha. Someone is very quick to the draw. Although, they don't look very happy to be near each other....

  • imageLittleMissWifey:

    *waiting for the pics of Stevens hugging Palin*

    In 3....2....1....

    Well, they have had a bit of a rocky relationship. Still, he endorsed her, and she hasn't denounced that endorsement. By GOP logic, that means that she shares his views and values.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Palin is associated with a known felon! Egads!!!!!  Wink
    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards