June 2009 Weddings
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Am I the only one...

...who finds this irritating?

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=134828141

(My rant is forthcoming, but I've got to run out for a couple of hours. I'd like to hear what other people think...)

Photobucket

Re: Am I the only one...

  • Yes. I agree with Firth. I hate when artistry goes out the window in the name of sheltering virgin ears. 
    image image
    Lucy Elizabeth 10.27.12
  • As someone who saw the movie, this is super irritating. Why do things always need to become PC, ugh. I completely agree with Firth, it should stay as it is. 
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • v3ronv3ron member
    Fourth Anniversary
    Does this mean the original won't be available via Netflix, etc? I haven't seen it yet?! Ridiculous.
    image
  • Dumb. People go overboard with the PC stuff these days.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I haven't even seen it yet (scheduled to go with a moms group next Thursday), but I've heard that the use of the F word is actually an important and highly relevant component of the movie. It's a shame they're replacing the original with this in theatres.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • My rant has had time to simmer, so it won't be as exciting as I promised, but here's the cliff notes:

    The MPAA bugs me in general. The completely arbitrary nature with which they determine what counts as "G" vs. "PG" vs. "PG-13" vs. "R" is ridiculous to me. They're inconsistent, for one, and they demonize language and sex far more often than they demonize violence, which irritates me to no end.

    The other thing that bugs me is that the original ("R") version here in the United States got a "12 and Older" rating in the UK. I'm sick and tired of the puritanical nonsense in this country. How is the movie fine for European pre-teens but not acceptable for anyone under the age of SEVENTEEN (without parental supervision) in this country? Mind blowing.

    To top it off, I think this is yet another example of other people wanting the rest of the world to do their "jobs" for them, especially parents. I sincerely doubt that there is a large enough percentage of people out there who went, saw the "R" version of The King's Speech, and thought "Gee. I let my 14-year-old to see this if the content was sanitized down to a PG-13 level." No. People just wait for the MPAA to sit around and make decisions for them. It p!sses me off.

    Okay. Rant done. And I'm hoping the original/R version remains available, because the film truly is brilliant and worthy of being seen as is.

    Photobucket
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards