March 2009 Weddings
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Annoyed re: Maternity/Newborn photographer! Help me choose...

So I am looking into photographers for maternity & newborn photos.

Not sure I am doing maternity yet...but we will see.

Anyways, I have 3 in mind. One is an acquaintance, and she is just starting out (wicked cheap). But not sure her skill is where I want it to be....yet. Services are very affordable and everything is a la carte.

Here is her site Kellyswieckphotography.com 

Then there is this other woman... helenmakadiaphotography.com

She is awesome, I love her style and has lots of experience. Except with experience comes $. We can afford it, but she only edits 25-30 images and with the price of the session i either get 1 file to do my own announcements or 50 5x7 flat announcements. All else I need to  buy a la carte.

Then there is this other woman. perspectives-photography.com So, I know she just had a baby, but she also has been scheduling group sessions in the interim (I know this because she belongs to another forum I post on). I have emailed her 3 times within the past 2 weeks with NO response. WTF?!?  Her packages are definitely the best, though.

 WWYD?

Do I go with her if she ever contacts me back, or just go with the second chicky who is much more attentive, although a bit more expensive? 

Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

Re: Annoyed re: Maternity/Newborn photographer! Help me choose...

  • Okay, my first instinct about the third woman is RUN THE OTHER WAY!! I get that she just had a baby, blah blah blah, but her lack of response reminds me very much of my wedding photographer, and I ended up hating him.  His photos weren't bad, some of them were actually very good, but he was a complete pain to deal with.  Took him forever to schedule things, get us stuff, etc.  It was aweful.  I wish I had gone with someone else.

    I would go with the second lady.  It's nice to help out someone who's just starting, and it's great that the first girl is cheap, but you know you probably won't be happy with the results.  But then, it doesn't seem like you get much for what you are paying.

    Is there a 4th option?

  • Just want to say, I had this nice long response and the nest just ate it...grrr

    So now you get the short version Sad

    Option #1

    If this is not what you think you want don't do it.  These are pictures your going to be looking at for the rest of your life and your LOs life.

    Option #2

    Try to talk to her, the economy isn't the best so photogs might be willing to work with you and give you what you're looking for especially since it's for baby pictures, they might actually realize in the long run it will produce a lot more work for them if you get what you want.

    Option #3

    I think I would give her a little bit more time to respond, especially if she just had a baby.  Maybe she's actually on maternity leave.

  • I think I'd wait a little longer for #3 to contact you back. Like Vikki said, she may have just self-imposed a maternity leave once she realized how crazy having a newborn is. 

    I'd hate paying so much for #2 and get so little, but I think she's a better choice than #1 just because of what you get in the long run. 

  • Not responding to you is not a good sign. Ok, she just had a baby, but no response? I had an auto-response set up in my work email when I was on maternity leave, and I wasn't even trying to run my own business...

    #2 is great! Looking at #1, the shots seemed pretty standard, but not really a quality I'd pay money for. Well, I haven't paid a photog to take pics of Nate at all, but if I did, it should be worth spending money on.

    ETA: deleting where I repeated myself. 

    imageimageimage
    Lilypie Second Birthday tickers
  • Why don't you try a maternity shoot with the newbie and if you like her pictures go with her for the newborn shots?  If she ends up stinking you can ditch her and go for the more expensive photographer.  I wouldn't be update about bad maternity shots (though I hated and thought I looked terrible pregnant).

    I'd avoid person #3.  You don't want to stress about hunting her down once baby is here.

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Thanks guys.

    Maybe I will try to negotiate with # 2.

    I think it's bullsh!t the #2 woman did not get back to me- when I KNOW FOR A FACT she is working (her FB photography page, the fact she has done a newborn photo shoot like, oh, 3 days ago).

    Whatever, that's just ridiculous...not thrilled with that! 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I would go with #2, and then use #1 for the "not as important" baby pics...like 3 months and 9 months. (If she's great, use her for 6 months and 12 months, but if not, go with the expensive lady and see if she'll give you a deal for packaging shoots).

    ITA with the ladies who said run as fast as you can from #3 as possible. I love my wedding photographer to death but she can be bad about responding and then is not so quick to get proofs back. It is infuriating. I'm hoping she's better with the pics we just had taking because I'd like to get them back before May is a year old...you know what I mean?

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards