Grand Rapids Nesties
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Am I a prude?

Is there an age when it becomes no longer appropriate for a parent to share nude photos of a child on the internet/social sites?

A college aquaintance (not a close friend at all) is a friend of mine on Facebook and has a newly four-year old daughter (birthday within the past month). She WAY overshares her kid on FB - photos, videos, posts, more photos, etc., but that is an issue all its own. What I am concerned with is that she continues to post photos and videos of this girl in various stages of dress/undress. When the girl was a baby I thought it was normal; one year old probably also still normal; two years old made me start thinking hmmm. At age three I really noticed it and now, with a shirtless photo posted just last week I was concerned.

I get that she is just wanting to capture "life as it happens" and spontaneous photos/videos mean you don't have time to set everything up to make it look perfect. This last image was of the girl eating a popsicle with the sticky stuff all over her arms and torso - it's probably funny to other parents (?) and was shared as "Look what she did now!" But I still have a problem with it and think it is inappropriate.

Am I a prude? Or is this strange?

image

Re: Am I a prude?

  • Hmmm.  I don't necessarily think you're a prude, but I don't necessarily think that what she's doing is strange. 

    I wouldn't think anything of shirtless 4 year old - especially given the situation of the photo you posted.  It may not be that wise of her to be posting it everywhere, but I don't think it's weird.

  • I feel like the Internet has changed everything. I think it's fine thatyhe photo was taken and fine if it were in a photo album (or even a frame) at home. Posting it on the Internet is something else altogether. Facebook's use policy states that fb owns all photos posted to the site--that's a particularly scary thing when the photos are of kids.
  • imageDiana Prince:
    I feel like the Internet has changed everything. I think it's fine thatyhe photo was taken and fine if it were in a photo album (or even a frame) at home. Posting it on the Internet is something else altogether. Facebook's use policy states that fb owns all photos posted to the site--that's a particularly scary thing when the photos are of kids.

    Yeah, I agree with this.  

    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • No, you're not a prude.  Everyone has a different level for what they deem in/appropriate.  Shirtless pics of little kids don't bother me, but I do have a fb friend who kind of crosses some lines in my book.  She'll post naked pictures of her 3 year old boy.  I can admit that they are funny and cute, but on the other hand, I'm sure this child is not going to think so when he gets into grade school and those are all online.  I guess that's what I try to think of when I post - what will my child think of this being online?  There is another one of him going pee outside, again, prob funny to the parents, but prob doesn't need to be shared with the world.  Not everything needs to be public.  Then again, based on the status updates, this person is not exactly private either, so the pics go along with her personality.  I guess what I'm trying to say is some people are "over-sharers", while others, like yourself, are not.  I don't think that makes you a prude though.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • TheWopTheWop member
    10000 Comments Fifth Anniversary

    imageDiana Prince:
    I feel like the Internet has changed everything. I think it's fine thatyhe photo was taken and fine if it were in a photo album (or even a frame) at home. Posting it on the Internet is something else altogether. Facebook's use policy states that fb owns all photos posted to the site--that's a particularly scary thing when the photos are of kids.

    Agreed.  I personally would never put pictures of that context on the internet.  Too many weirdos out there. 

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • I don't know if you remember, but I posted about something similar about a year ago.  A FB friend of mine posted a picture (and made it her profile pic!) of her three kids lined, naked, facing away from her.  So it was a picture of three kids' butts.  The oldest was a four year old girl and I thought it was completely inappropriate to post pictures of a naked four year old girl on FB.  I reported the photo on FB, and it was deleted shortly thereafter.

    So, no, it's not just you.  I think naked kid photos on FB (or anywhere on the internet) are a terrible idea, personally. 

  • I still take bath time pictures of the girls, but those are for our photo album only. Because a) I don't want them out there and b) I know it makes people uncomfortable. I think between the ages of 2-3 is when I would stop posting naked kid shots.  And at that age, it was mainly bath time pictures where they were sitting down and you could only sit the top of their chest to their head.

    Hmmm..I better double check my blog and FB account to make sure I'm not being a lier.

    I was at a family party last week and changed Allison out of her dress clothes to play clothes. I did it right in front of everyone and I thought to myself maybe she is at the age where I should go into another room. I don't don't care, but it might make other people uncomfortable.

  • I don't necessarily think there is anything wrong with that picture given the context.

    But personally I haven't posted naked pics of K at all on FB.  The most naked has been from the chest up.  There is 1 bath picture, but the private area is covered by one of his bath books.  Every bath picture I've taken has been with a wash cloth or something covering him.  So I don't even "own" a picture (posted or not) of him completely naked. I think that is unnecessary. 

    Side Note- there have been pictures I've taken but not posted because I know that certain people *cough* Inlaws *cough* will just not get.  We took a picture of him at 21 days and then 21 weeks of him holding a beer bottle.  Obviously we gave him none, but I know they wouldn't get the joke. 

  • imagegvsubride05:

    I still take bath time pictures of the girls, but those are for our photo album only. Because a) I don't want them out there and b) I know it makes people uncomfortable. I think between the ages of 2-3 is when I would stop posting naked kid shots.  And at that age, it was mainly bath time pictures where they were sitting down and you could only sit the top of their chest to their head.

    Hmmm..I better double check my blog and FB account to make sure I'm not being a lier.

    I was at a family party last week and changed Allison out of her dress clothes to play clothes. I did it right in front of everyone and I thought to myself maybe she is at the age where I should go into another room. I don't don't care, but it might make other people uncomfortable.

    THIS 100%.  Chymes, you are not a prude.  I would feel exactly the same way.  I recently posted a pic of J when he was naked but his privates were blurred out of the picture due to water being on the shower glass.  I second thought it for a minute but still shared due to no privates showing.  I would definitely NOT do that when he turns three or older..  Too many creepoids out there.

     And I can't check to see if I'm being a liar because I have too many to look through ;-)

  • ChymesChymes member

    Yeah, my top concern is for the creepers out there, followed VERY closely by the thought "This child is going to HATE her mother later." I would never want naked pictures of myself out on the internet, regardless of my age. I think a lot of parents are way too enthusiastic to share EVERYTHING that they don't stop to think about repercussions.

    I don't necessarily need validation for feeling this way, but I am glad that I'm not alone.

    image
  • imageChymes:

     followed VERY closely by the thought "This child is going to HATE her mother later." I would never want naked pictures of myself out on the internet, regardless of my age.

    I"ll admit.  This is something that I've not thought about.  Maybe this is my subliminal revenge for the shitty diapers and sleepless nights Devil

  • ChymesChymes member
    imageTigers:
    imageChymes:

     followed VERY closely by the thought "This child is going to HATE her mother later." I would never want naked pictures of myself out on the internet, regardless of my age.

    I"ll admit.  This is something that I've not thought about.  Maybe this is my subliminal revenge for the shitty diapers and sleepless nights Devil

    Not at all?

    Uh oh, Tigers...

    Wink 

    image
  • Here is the recipe link for the Guiness Cake. I deleted my post with the picture and the children post and it had the link in one of the children posts.

    http://nookandpantry.blogspot.com/2009/02/guinness-chocolate-cupcake-with-baileys.html

  • Shirtless at four wouldn't bother me. Bottomless at four crosses the line. I wouldn't think twice about posting a picture of Mere's butt at this age, but I don't think vagina shots are appropriate (or penis shots, had she been a boy). I'm not sure the age when it's no longer appropriate... three? I really don't know.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic CafeMom Tickers
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards