9 to 5
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

This has got to be somehow illegal

This is happening to my sister...she is more mad rather then prepared to do something but I'm hoping to empower her.

She works (worked?) for an National Insurance Company but in a small office of her boss, boss's son, and like 1 or 2 other people. My sister went out of work suddenly, emergency surgery on her back. She had no vacation/sick time built up. Her office hired a temp but has now told her that when she returns she has been demoted to a lower position with a lower salary, I think one that didn't even exist in this office. They made her drop her keys off, and when she did, they handed her a box with all of her stuff in it. My mom asked (because she had driven because my sister can't drive yet) "Are you firing her"...they said "No, but we can't be liable for her possessions".

Her manager is claiming she finds my sister incompetent, citing all these things she was doing wrong when she worked there (my sister says she wasn't trained properly) and petty things like a customer had seen her walking before the back surgery and asked if she was okay and my sister responded "I have a bad back"...her manager says she is appalled that she shared that with a customer.

It seems to me, that this woman has such a small office that she cannot handle an extended absence, which I understand, but aren't there laws protecting you from getting demoted because you are temporarily disabled. I think she's smart enough not to let her go but I think she's tryiing to make it so she doesn't come back and she can just keep the "temp".

My sister believes that she did not need to file FMLA  since the office is so small it wouldn't apply, I'm not sure since technically it's part of a larger chain.

Where would you start to see if this is appropriate.

Re: This has got to be somehow illegal

  • How long did she work there before the surgery? (You mentioned she didn't have time off built up, so I'm not sure. That implies she hasn't worked there for very long, in which case she wouldn't have been eligible for FMLA anyway.)

    You may be right that the company is too small. There have to be at least 50 employees within a 75 mile radius to qualify for FMLA. I'm not sure how it would have worked in this case since it's a chain. 

    Obviously, if she was eligible and had filed FMLA, this would totally not be allowed. So her employer may be taking advantage of the fact that she didn't/couldn't file. I would contact someone from the DOL in her state and talk to them about next steps. Since she didn't notify the company of intent to take FMLA leave already, she might be out of luck.  

    It's possible there could be an argument that intent to take FMLA was implied, but that's doubtful. I would just contact someone from the Labor Department and see what they have to say. She should also decide if this is worth hiring a lawyer over. Though I'm not sure it's technically illegal, it could be.

    I'm not really an expert though; I sometimes write about issues related to benefits, but I've never written on FMLA specifically, so maybe someone else can help. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • She needs to find out if FMLA applies to her or not.  Because if it doesn't, then she may be SOL. There is no other "job protection" out there for businesses that are too small to qualify for FMLA.  Honestly, this situation may be why FMLA exists only for larger companies - it's too hard for a small company to keep someones job open or have another job for them when they come back.  Small companies don't have the same resources.

    "Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."
    ~Benjamin Franklin

    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
    DS dx with celiac disease 5/28/10

  • Ditto ECB - if she's eligible for FMLA then she may be protected.  Otherwise, while yes it's crappy to suddenly fire someone after a health emergency, I'm guessing she was out for a significant amount of time if she had to have surgery on her back.  The company is handling it very poorly but it's understandable that in an office of 3-4 people they couldn't hold her job for her.
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
    DS1 born June 2008 | m/c at 9w March 2011 | DS2 born April 2012
  • Have her check state laws too.  In my state, for example, local laws protect employees more than FMLA does. 
    IUI - BFP! Baby boy born still - August 2012
    IVF - BFP - miscarriage June 2013
    FET - BFN
    FET - BFN
    Switched clinics
    IVF with PGD - three embryos created, all healthy - July 2014
    FET - transferred two embryos (boy and girl) - Nov 2014 - BFP!
    Baby Boy born July 2015

  • FMLA does not apply as the company does not have more than 50 employees in a 75 mile radius.  I'm not familiar with Maryland leave laws but it looks like even Maryland Flexible leave need 15 employees.  You can always go to laborlawtalk.com to verify.  They are a fantastic resource.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards