Minneapolis/St. Paul Nesties
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Casey Anthony Verdict

I'm watching CNN at work {soooo slow today} - has anyone else seen the verdict?

 

I don't want to spoil it for people, but OMG!!

image
jack | born 9.13.12 at 40w4d | 9 lbs 12 oz | 23 in
Lilypie First Birthday tickers
imageimage
my puppy loves - chloe & jenson
pregnancy blog | chart

Re: Casey Anthony Verdict

  • Only partially shocked. My FB is blowing up. Prosecution has nobody to blame but themselves IMO.
    image
    Lilypie Premature Baby tickers

    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • I'm shocked - only that I wanted so badly for her to be held accountable for what I feel like I know she did.

    I'm not shocked that the jury had enough 'reasonable doubt' because the trial was a complete shitshow. 

    :(

    image
    jack | born 9.13.12 at 40w4d | 9 lbs 12 oz | 23 in
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
    imageimage
    my puppy loves - chloe & jenson
    pregnancy blog | chart
  • Not shocked. A bit annoyed, but definitely not shocked. They didn't prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. They proved she's a bad mother and a liar, but not a murderer beyond a shadow of a doubt.

    I also think it's easy to forget that some things cannot be proven. We're so used to watching CSI and Bones and all these shows with fancy-schmancy forensic science, some of which is complete fiction. It's not always possible to know the exact time and cause of death. And ultimately, I think that's what cost the prosecution the case. If they could have proven a time or cause of death, they would've been better off for a conviction.

    New Name, Old Nestie Blog: Career Girl Network
  • imageMarcyLT:

    Not shocked. A bit annoyed, but definitely not shocked. They didn't prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. They proved she's a bad mother and a liar, but not a murderer beyond a shadow of a doubt.

    I also think it's easy to forget that some things cannot be proven. We're so used to watching CSI and Bones and all these shows with fancy-schmancy forensic science, some of which is complete fiction. It's not always possible to know the exact time and cause of death. And ultimately, I think that's what cost the prosecution the case. If they could have proven a time or cause of death, they would've been better off for a conviction.

    They only have to prove it beyond a REASONABLE doubt, not beyond a shadow of a doubt.
  • Honestly, I figured not guilty of murder but guilty of child abuse and manslaughter.
    image
    Lilypie Premature Baby tickers

    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • I'm only surprised the abuse and neglect charges didn't stick. 
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • How could they not find her guilty of at least child abuse though? She didn't report her missing for 30 days and she lied to the police about where she had been.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageanitalynn:

    I'm shocked - only that I wanted so badly for her to be held accountable for what I feel like I know she did.

    I'm not shocked that the jury had enough 'reasonable doubt' because the trial was a complete shitshow. 

    :(

    This is basically how I feel.

    It seems like OJ all over again ... common belief is that the defendant is guilty, but gets off pretty much scot free.

    image
    Mr. Sammy Dog
  • This was my exact prediction for the outcome.

    I think the prosecution only proved beyond a reasonable doubt that someone murdered her. I think they only proved that that someone might have been her mother.

  • imagehuwehotaling:
    How could they not find her guilty of at least child abuse though? She didn't report her missing for 30 days and she lied to the police about where she had been.

    This. I mean... there are a few options:

    She KNEW her child was dead and didn't care.

    She killed her child and didn't want to get in trouble.

    She had no clue where her child was for a full month.


    Any of those should be considered child abuse or at least child neglect.  I don't understand. It just makes me so incredibly sad that a little girl is dead without any justice. 

  • imageJosiePosy:
    Honestly, I figured not guilty of murder but guilty of child abuse and manslaughter.

    Yep, totally this, and I have been saying all along that the trial was an absolute shitshow.  I'm still bummed that she'll prbobably walk free Thursday morning after her sentencing and I cringe at the thought of her getting knocked up again 

    No Siggy

  • The whole situation disgusts me but as one of my good friends said (who is a lawyer), "Not guilty" is not necessarily the same thing as "innocent". 

    The prosecution didn't fully prove, without a doubt, that Casey murdered her daughter.  Of course based on the circumstantial evidence, I think we can all agree that there was more than enough there to convince a lot of people of her guilt, but there was a glimmer of doubt somewhere that the jury could find plausible. 

    That being said - I hope that karma catches up with her someday.  What a horrible person.  

     

  • imageJosiePosy:
    Honestly, I figured not guilty of murder but guilty of child abuse and manslaughter.

    I thought this scenario was a likely possibility, but I never thought she would only get charged with lying to police.  She was obviously being neglectful by not reporting that her child was missing for a whole f-ing month!  If it really was someone else that killed her, I think it would have helped to know right away that she was gone.  Amber alerts have proven to be effective.

    It sucks that this is the outcome.  We will never know what happened, and it sickens me that she will probably be able to make money off of this AND the fact that she could pro-create again!! 

    I wonder what will happen when she is released. Are her parents going to take her in?! Does she want to go back to her parents?  Can you imagine if you were one of her friends...what now?

  • imagebrifox711:

    imageJosiePosy:
    Honestly, I figured not guilty of murder but guilty of child abuse and manslaughter.

    I thought this scenario was a likely possibility, but I never thought she would only get charged with lying to police.  She was obviously being neglectful by not reporting that her child was missing for a whole f-ing month!  If it really was someone else that killed her, I think it would have helped to know right away that she was gone.  Amber alerts have proven to be effective.

    It sucks that this is the outcome.  We will never know what happened, and it sickens me that she will probably be able to make money off of this AND the fact that she could pro-create again!! 

    I wonder what will happen when she is released. Are her parents going to take her in?! Does she want to go back to her parents?  Can you imagine if you were one of her friends...what now?

    I have been thinking about all of this too, but she could totally write a tell-all book and admit it since they can't convict her of it now.  My morbid curiosity would totally read that book, sick, I know.  I also want to know if her parents are going to take her in after she totally dragged them through the mud in court.  Something tells me they might

    No Siggy

  • imagedestination09:
    imagebrifox711:

    imageJosiePosy:
    Honestly, I figured not guilty of murder but guilty of child abuse and manslaughter.

    I thought this scenario was a likely possibility, but I never thought she would only get charged with lying to police.  She was obviously being neglectful by not reporting that her child was missing for a whole f-ing month!  If it really was someone else that killed her, I think it would have helped to know right away that she was gone.  Amber alerts have proven to be effective.

    It sucks that this is the outcome.  We will never know what happened, and it sickens me that she will probably be able to make money off of this AND the fact that she could pro-create again!! 

    I wonder what will happen when she is released. Are her parents going to take her in?! Does she want to go back to her parents?  Can you imagine if you were one of her friends...what now?

    I have been thinking about all of this too, but she could totally write a tell-all book and admit it since they can't convict her of it now.  My morbid curiosity would totally read that book, sick, I know.  I also want to know if her parents are going to take her in after she totally dragged them through the mud in court.  Something tells me they might

    I believe her parents left the courtroom immediately, right? I bet they won't talk to her for awhile. Until of course she makes money off her book/movie/fame etc.

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagedestination09:

    I have been thinking about all of this too, but she could totally write a tell-all book and admit it since they can't convict her of it now.  My morbid curiosity would totally read that book, sick, I know.  I also want to know if her parents are going to take her in after she totally dragged them through the mud in court.  Something tells me they might

     Like how OJ apparently *finally* confessed everything to Oprah? Because, well, he can.  That's crap, too, IMO.  I understand the reasoning behind the Double Jeopardy laws, but I feel like you negate that 'protection' when you openly confess to a crime. 

  • I wasn't shocked by the verdict,I had watched a segment on Dateline (or similiar show) where they ran the evidence by a mock jury, and the jury found her not guilty of 1st degree murder.   

    But verdict did surprise me somewhat, because while the evidence was clearly circumstantial and not the best, other people have been convicted with even weaker evidence. 

    This became such a high profile case, it seemed that the jurors chose to err on the side of caution rather than convict.   

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards