North Florida Nesties
Dear Community,
Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.
If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.
Thank you.
Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.
S/O- Baby timeline Non-clicky poll
There are a bunch of us in the post below that are all," No babies anytime soon, tyvm!" Who plays a bigger part in that? You or DH? Is it equally mutual?
It's me. 100%. At this point the only reason why I'm thinking about them is that I can't imagine not ever having them. I adore kids. I'm good with them. I always assumed I'd be a mom, so what's my hang up as I get older? Cris has been ready since before we got married. But alas, while I do value/genuinely care about his opinion & feelings, I'm the one with the ute.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Re: S/O- Baby timeline Non-clicky poll
I tend to agree that if you wait 'til you can afford kids, you'll never have them. I never thought we'd be able to afford two in daycare, but we made it work.. even if it is like paying a double mortgage payment.
I would say it's more me. DH is ok never having them too, but if I said "Hey, let's stay in FL and pop out a kid in 9 months," he would be open to that, too.
Also.... the whole "if you wait until you can afford kids, you'll never have them" thing really pisses me off, to be honest. It's an expense. If you are cutting out luxuries to pay your monthly bills, you wouldn't go get a shiny new car. And no one would encourage your getting one who had your financial wellbeing at heart. I completely understand that kids are not budgetable in necessarily the same fashion, but the thought that they CAN'T be, or the implication that you should just go ahead and have a kid and you can figure out how to make it work later? I find it somewhat disgusting, financially irresponsible, and not in the best interest of said hypothetical child.
< /tirade>
Actually in my mid to late 20s, I went through a major babyrabies stage where I really felt that drive to have them, despite not being involved with someone I would have kids with. It was independent of that.
Once I hit right about 30, I started to see the hugeness of the responsibility I'd be taking on almost entirely myself physically and of course theoretically it's 'equal' in the raising, but let's be honest: it isn't anywhere equal. The further I went into my 30s, I felt that I could probably not have them and be happy, but if we DID want one jointly, I wanted to give myself as best of a chance to conceive, get help if we needed it, and have a chance at birthing naturally as I could, which meant having one by 35 (OB policies are more stringent after that), while also giving us a little time to enjoy marriage and get settled financially. So... essentially, I ended up with a small window of a few months to try and end up with a pre-35 baby.
If I could have had a few more years to blow off though, I would have blown off at least one more easily. On the other hand, the gamble could have just as easily blown up in my face. But, those were my priorities in trying, and despite the non-natural-birth outcome, I at least had the chance.