Trouble in Paradise
doglove
member
Dear Community,
Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.
If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.
Thank you.
Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.
Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.
If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.
Thank you.
Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.
DD??
Did she really DD?? It was just here!
Re: DD??
I'm surprised because she left it up so long.
i am sad bc i wanted to go back and read all of the other scathing responses..
i wonder if anyone got a c+p of it....
I left it up for 24 hours and read every response along with almost 7,000 other people. Too much personal information to leave it up forever.
ETA - I hope you took a lot of that advice.
so you're gonna break up with him, then, right?
Yeah, I read about 3 pages of it last night and am totally WTFBBQ over this situation...why even dig for more information and talk to him about it? A conviction for possession of child porn is a dealbreaker on the face of it.
exactly.
lol dying at the wtfbbq...
That was my point all along, but it seemed to get kind of lost. The criminal system is set up with lots of stop gap measures; the police need probable cause, a prosecutor needs probable cause, and then a judge found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. They don't prosecute and convict in the type of scenario he is describing. Why she thinks she should be entitled to dig through confidential information when people far more qualified and informed on this type of case have already said that he had what was clearly and obviously child porn is beyond me. And that's aside from her obviously questionable ability to judge people (re. ex husband #2) or make decision (allowing a registered sex offender around her children).
You were on fire in that thread kellbell. Everytime I read one of your replies I was all BOOYEAH!
yes yessssss exactly. and it takes something SIGNIFICANT to actually see any jail time at all. so obvs this is totally valid and significant and shame on her for letting a sex offender be near her children (i didnt get to that part before she DD'd). dear sweet jesus
WELL ITS GONE NOW!!
It's not like I get to use my creepy child porn knowledge every day. I am sulking.