Buying A Home
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Home inspection issue - help

We are selling our home.  The buyers had it inspected, and one of the items on their follow up request (the Reply to Inspections Form in PA) said, "Have licensed roofer evaluate roof and make necessary repairs.  Lack of kickout flashing."  It also said, "have roof inspected and certified," but we crossed that last line off, and the buyers agreed to it.  So, I planned to have a roofer come install kickout flashing and make any repairs that he thought were needed.  I did not plan to pay the $275 roof inspection fee since we crossed that request out.

Fast forward... The roofer comes today, goes up on the roof, comes down and says there already is kickout flashing up there, and that there are no repairs needed.  I ask him for a receipt and he says there's no charge since he's not doing any work.  I told him I needed a receipt or some type of documentation, and he said no because I wasn't willing to pay the $275 report fee.

I called a few other roofers and they told me that they wouldn't provide me anything in writing, either, unless I pay the certification fee and have the roof inspected.

In reviewing the reply to inspection form and contract, it doesn't say ANYWHERE that I have to have the repairs done by a certain date or provide receipts or proof of anything.  So, do I have to provide a receipt for this roof stuff?  I held up my end of the deal, I had a roofer come out and evaluate, he can't install the flashing cause it's already there, and no repairs are needed.  What do I do?  I don't want to screw the buyer, but shouldn't they have asked for receipts?  Do I have to pay the certification fee when they didn't write anywhere that they need documentation?  I can give them the name and number of the roofer that we used if they want to call and talk to him.  I don't know what to do.  Thanks.

Re: Home inspection issue - help

  • If the buyers didn't ask for receipts then you're not obligated to provide them (unless there are wacky state laws in your area, check with your REA). I'd tell the buyers that the roofer said no repairs are necessary and just provide his name for verification. At any rate, it's the buyers' responsibility to pay for inspections, not the sellers. 
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
    DS1 born June 2008 | m/c at 9w March 2011 | DS2 born April 2012
  • imagevanillacourage:
    If the buyers didn't ask for receipts then you're not obligated to provide them (unless there are wacky state laws in your area, check with your REA). I'd tell the buyers that the roofer said no repairs are necessary and just provide his name for verification. At any rate, it's the buyers' responsibility to pay for inspections, not the sellers. 

    This. If the buyers want certification, they can call their own roofer to go up, inspect it, and write up their findings.

  • Try to explain to them what you shared with us in regards to the flashing being there, etc.  They might be ok with that.  If it comes down to them "walking" over this -- you might want to consider paying the $275 just to close the deal.  I know it is "technically" their responsibility, but sometimes is pays to pay KWIM.
    Crafts for Lily
    My Valentine Bookends (2~13~13, 2~15~09)
    image
  • I would tell them what you told us and provide the name and number of the roofing company (and the name of the person who came out, if you can). As a buyer, I would accept that, based on the terms of the agreement you described. However, I would be prepared to pay the $275 to keep the deal going, if necessary. From their perspective, the buyers have documentation saying that the roof needs to be repaired, but you are presenting conflicting information with no documentation to back it up. You did hold up your end of the bargain, so it stinks if they don't accept your explanation, but I don't think it's worth losing a sale over $275.

  • imageMay-Bride:

    I would tell them what you told us and provide the name and number of the roofing company (and the name of the person who came out, if you can). As a buyer, I would accept that, based on the terms of the agreement you described. However, I would be prepared to pay the $275 to keep the deal going, if necessary. From their perspective, the buyers have documentation saying that the roof needs to be repaired, but you are presenting conflicting information with no documentation to back it up. You did hold up your end of the bargain, so it stinks if they don't accept your explanation, but I don't think it's worth losing a sale over $275.

    I agree with this.  They have documentation that repairs are needed, I would wonder as a buyer why your professional didn't find the same.

  • imageKurtsWife09:
    imageMay-Bride:

    I would tell them what you told us and provide the name and number of the roofing company (and the name of the person who came out, if you can). As a buyer, I would accept that, based on the terms of the agreement you described. However, I would be prepared to pay the $275 to keep the deal going, if necessary. From their perspective, the buyers have documentation saying that the roof needs to be repaired, but you are presenting conflicting information with no documentation to back it up. You did hold up your end of the bargain, so it stinks if they don't accept your explanation, but I don't think it's worth losing a sale over $275.

    I agree with this.  They have documentation that repairs are needed, I would wonder as a buyer why your professional didn't find the same.

    Their inspection report notes a lack of flashing on the roof, but also says that the inspector stood on a ladder and looked at the roof with binoculars rather than climbing up there.  Our roofer went onto the roof.  His guess is that it was hard for the inspector to see with binoculars - said he should have gone onto the roof to inspect it.

  • So the guy you called out found nothing and you want him to give you a written reoprt for free? well duh. He needs to make money, they need to paid for thier work, even if its work not done, if you want it varified by a professional you are going to have to pay the fee to get documentaition...same as anything else in life. However you could report what you heard word of mouth...but if i was the buyer, i wouldnt beleive you without a professionals report, and you may have a hard time finding someone else if thier inspector says the same thing and you have no proof to refute it.
  • imagetoothpastechica:
    So the guy you called out found nothing and you want him to give you a written reoprt for free? well duh. He needs to make money, they need to paid for thier work, even if its work not done, if you want it varified by a professional you are going to have to pay the fee to get documentaition...same as anything else in life. However you could report what you heard word of mouth...but if i was the buyer, i wouldnt beleive you without a professionals report, and you may have a hard time finding someone else if thier inspector says the same thing and you have no proof to refute it.

    Uhhh - no.  I  hired him to install kickout flashing and make other necessary repairs.  I did not ask for a report (which would certify that the roof and his repairs are warrantied for a year).  Since he couldn't install flashing since it was already there, I expected him to document that he looked at the roof, there already is flashing, so he didn't install flashing. 

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards