Seattle Nesties
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

FB: Soooo not PC

There is a FB group for all people who have my maiden name.  I joined a year or two ago, and was able to connect with a 3rd or 4th cousin who lives in England.  So I've kept up to date with the discussions on the group to see if I can find more relatives.

 Anyways... right now there is a discussion about what branch of our namesake were slave-owners, and reproduced to "create" the African-American Maidenname's.

I'm just sitting here shaking my head.  The group is full of middle aged people, maybe it's not such a faux pas for their generation?

OMH est. May 7, 2011
image
Photo courtesy of jennygg.com
My never updated Planning/Married Bio: http://mgoss228.weebly.com/
Seattle Knotties: Please page me if you send me a PM!

Re: FB: Soooo not PC

  • That's pretty messed up regardless of your generation.

    I wonder if the part of the country these people are from makes a difference? My dad (nearing 60, I'd consider him middle aged) grew up in Seattle and didn't experience blatant racism firsthand growing up, but he clearly remembers reading news stories about horribly racist happenings in other parts of the country as a child. It deeply affected him to see that kind of stuff going on, and he would never say anything like what you're describing. But, apparently when he was a kid (50's/60s), those attitudes still existed in some places. Very sad.


    2012 Racing Plans:
    Valentine's Day Dash 5k, 02/11/2012, 33:03
    Seahawks 12k, 04/01/2012, 1:23:17
    Bellevue 10k, 04/29/2012
    Beat the Bridge 8k, 05/20/2012
    Seattle Rock n Roll Half Marathon, 06/23/2012
    ...more to come!
  • Maybe they are just trying to trace geneaology? I don't know since I'm not reading the actual posts. But I don't think that what you posted in and of itself is racist.
    image"I've always followed my father's advice: he told me, first to always keep my word and, second, to never insult anybody unintentionally. If I insult you, you can be goddamn sure I intend to. And, third, he told me not to go around looking for trouble." -John Wayne
  • imagePurposelyVague:
    Maybe they are just trying to trace geneaology? I don't know since I'm not reading the actual posts. But I don't think that what you posted in and of itself is racist.

    what's racist is wanting to differentiate between the African-American Maiden names and the White Maiden names.  It's ok to discuss who were slave owners, but the attitude about basically "creating" black people in the family line is racist.  Just ask an African-American what they would think reading that thread, probably wouldn't feel warm and fuzzy about their extended family.

  • imageamandasw:

    imagePurposelyVague:
    Maybe they are just trying to trace geneaology? I don't know since I'm not reading the actual posts. But I don't think that what you posted in and of itself is racist.

    what's racist is wanting to differentiate between the African-American Maiden names and the White Maiden names.  It's ok to discuss who were slave owners, but the attitude about basically "creating" black people in the family line is racist.  Just ask an African-American what they would think reading that thread, probably wouldn't feel warm and fuzzy about their extended family.

    I don't see how it is discriminatory to differentiate between "white" lines in the family and African-American lines. Again, looking at this from a geneaological perspective (because I can personally see no other reason for being part of a fb surname group unless you were interested in your family and its history), it could be potentially helpful to know which members were slave owners and fathered African-American children. Maybe there were two John Smiths in the family that lived close to the same time, but one was a slave owner and the other wasn't. If you were trying to figure out which John was the father of certain members of the family, it could be useful information. Just pointing out genetic differences in a family tree does not automatically make them racist. If they were saying that a specific line of African-American decendants didn't deserve to have the family name or were less equal parts of the family or something, I could agree with you.

     

    image"I've always followed my father's advice: he told me, first to always keep my word and, second, to never insult anybody unintentionally. If I insult you, you can be goddamn sure I intend to. And, third, he told me not to go around looking for trouble." -John Wayne
  • imagePurposelyVague:
    imageamandasw:

    imagePurposelyVague:
    Maybe they are just trying to trace geneaology? I don't know since I'm not reading the actual posts. But I don't think that what you posted in and of itself is racist.

    what's racist is wanting to differentiate between the African-American Maiden names and the White Maiden names.  It's ok to discuss who were slave owners, but the attitude about basically "creating" black people in the family line is racist.  Just ask an African-American what they would think reading that thread, probably wouldn't feel warm and fuzzy about their extended family.

    I don't see how it is discriminatory to differentiate between "white" lines in the family and African-American lines. Again, looking at this from a geneaological perspective (because I can personally see no other reason for being part of a fb surname group unless you were interested in your family and its history), it could be potentially helpful to know which members were slave owners and fathered African-American children. Maybe there were two John Smiths in the family that lived close to the same time, but one was a slave owner and the other wasn't. If you were trying to figure out which John was the father of certain members of the family, it could be useful information. Just pointing out genetic differences in a family tree does not automatically make them racist. If they were saying that a specific line of African-American decendants didn't deserve to have the family name or were less equal parts of the family or something, I could agree with you.

     

    It isn't always about what you say, but how you say it though, right?  Using words like "create" is kind of offensive.  Granted, OP would have to post more of the discussion, but my impression is that they weren't exactly saying things as PC as you did.  There are good and bad ways to go about that discussion, it just sounds like they weren't really being very sensitive (and probably think/know everyone in the discussion is white and therefore wouldn't care what kind of language they use).

  • yikes...
    BabyFruit Ticker BabyFetus Ticker we're having twins!
  • I find it all interesting...doesn't mean you have to be proud of that ancestory, but why pretend it didn't happen. 

    I was able to trace a line of DH's (he is black) fam all the way back to a slave owner/slave.  But also see that he was freed, given land by the slave owner family and that line went on to start the first African-American insurance co or bank in NC, owned land and were free b/f most others and led to the first African-American in Congress.  I find it fascinating.

    And when I've traced my families back, I'm always looking for any slave owners (hoping not to find any, but I want to know).  Most of my family didn't, but there were a few lines that did.

    BabyFruit Ticker
  • imageamandasw:

    Granted, OP would have to post more of the discussion, but my impression is that they weren't exactly saying things as PC as you did.  There are good and bad ways to go about that discussion, it just sounds like they weren't really being very sensitive (and probably think/know everyone in the discussion is white and therefore wouldn't care what kind of language they use).

    The original thread on the FB started with an African American Maidenname asking if there were any other African Americans in the group.  There was a couple of responses, then someone wrote "I wonder whose ancestors created you guys."  The grouping of the African Americans under "you guys" and using the term "created" rubbed me the wrong way. 

    No one else got offended (or at least didn't post it).  The convo ended up moving to the # of people in the US with the last name (slightly over 25,000) and then a race breakdown ( 82.56% of those with this family name identified themselves as being white, 13.68 as black, .28 Asian & Pacific Islander, .69% American Indian & Native Alaskan, 1.41% as two or more races, and 1.39% as Hispanic ethnic origin)

    So I don't think any harm was meant by the post that made me side-eye it, and it was more of a genealogical topic overall.  I still don't care much for the wording they chose originally. 

    OMH est. May 7, 2011
    image
    Photo courtesy of jennygg.com
    My never updated Planning/Married Bio: http://mgoss228.weebly.com/
    Seattle Knotties: Please page me if you send me a PM!
  • imagemgoss228:

    The original thread on the FB started with an African American Maidenname asking if there were any other African Americans in the group.  There was a couple of responses, then someone wrote "I wonder whose ancestors created you guys."  The grouping of the African Americans under "you guys" and using the term "created" rubbed me the wrong way. 

    No one else got offended (or at least didn't post it).  The convo ended up moving to the # of people in the US with the last name (slightly over 25,000) and then a race breakdown ( 82.56% of those with this family name identified themselves as being white, 13.68 as black, .28 Asian & Pacific Islander, .69% American Indian & Native Alaskan, 1.41% as two or more races, and 1.39% as Hispanic ethnic origin)

    So I don't think any harm was meant by the post that made me side-eye it, and it was more of a genealogical topic overall.  I still don't care much for the wording they chose originally. 

    Yes, poor wording, and you can side-eye it all you want, but it doesn't seem to me like the OP meant it offensively.

    Daisypath Vacation tickers
  • I think the conversation/topic is fine, but this
    imagemgoss228:
    someone wrote "I wonder whose ancestors created you guys."
    is really bad.
    EDD 9/24/13 BabyFetus Ticker
    Best sound ever: baby's heartbeat! (Heard @ 10w1d)
  • imageCDMay2006:
    I think the conversation/topic is fine, but this
    imagemgoss228:
    someone wrote "I wonder whose ancestors created you guys."
    is really bad.

    Yeah, my first reaction was this isn't racist to me.  But, this language would definitely rub me the wrong way too...

    BabyFruit Ticker
  • imageCDMay2006:
    I think the conversation/topic is fine, but this
    imagemgoss228:
    someone wrote "I wonder whose ancestors created you guys."
    is really bad.

    this. presentation (in this case, wording) is everything.

    ♥ bfp2 02/15/2012 ♥ edd 10/23/2013 ♥
    ♥ bfp1 06/14/2011 ♥ edd 02/22/2012 ♥
    ♥ baby jennlin born on 02/15/2012 ♥

    image
    who says you can only wear your wedding dress once?

    honeymoon biomarried bioplanning bio
    jumped ship to the new and improved nest. back to TB for baby boards.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards