We're going to Germany and looking to stay somewhere between Munich and Berlin for 2 nights. We'll have almost 2 full days.
We had originally planned on Rothenburg ob der Tauber, but then I stumbled on these less touristy cities which interest us more and seem a little easier to get to from Munich.
If you've been to both, which did you prefer? They appear to be less than an hour apart by train. Is it unrealistic to stay in one and do a day trip to the other with this short amount of time?
I was leaning toward Bamberg because it's quaint and well preserved, and we'd like to take it easy after Munich and before sight-seeing in Berlin. I keep reading great things about Nuremberg also, but I'm not sure if 2 days is enough to do it justice.
Re: Bamberg or Nuremberg?
Thanks for the input!
I was leaning toward staying in Bamberg, but pictures of Nuremberg look beautiful and there seems to be more to do there. Knowing that you did it as a day trip makes me think it might be worth it to visit both, even if just for a short time.
My heart is as open as the sky.
Read about it on the blog
2 Corinthians 12:9 But he said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness." Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ's power may rest on me.