Health & Fitness
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Run break and weight loss, with science tangent

On 2/25 I ran a 5K and have been kind of bumming around since then, with only 4 runs in the 10ish days since the 5K.  That 5K was the culmination of C25K from late October to late February, and during that 4 month period I had run 3 times/week consistently, no breaks.

 So during this short little lull in my running, I've seen some considerable movement on the scale and am seeing lower numbers than I've ever seen before.

Is there science on my side to explain why an activity lull or hiatus might temporarily boost weight loss?  Maybe something to do with appetite or metabolism??

(And while I'm on the topic of weight loss, could someone explain how weight loss physically works?  I keep googling, and I keep getting answers like eat less, move more, but I'm really questioning where the weight "goes." Is all weight lost through excretions and respiration?  How does my body physically decrease in mass through this process of working out and eating better.  Can you explain the science?  Sorry....totally tangent.  I've just been wondering.)

Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

Re: Run break and weight loss, with science tangent

  • I have no idea what any of the answers are but I really hope someone knowledgeable answers.  I'm very interested to see what they have to say.

    image
  • epphdepphd member

    My understanding is that fat loss is accomplished by the diminishment of your fat cells in size - they are able to store the fat in each cell and as it is used, the cells get smaller. During weight loss you really don't lose fat cells; they just get smaller. This is one reason that long term weight loss is much harder for obese people: they lose fat but still have the same number of fat cells, which still churn out "hunger" or appetite hormones.  You can also lose mass via losing muscle, but that's not likely the case.

    If you were working out regularly before, it could have been that your muscles were holding on to water on a regular basis. (which is why you should never weigh yourself after a long run or strength training - often you are heavier!) Once you stop for a while, you "lose" that water weight.  But 4 runs in 10ish days is nothing to sneeze at, so maybe the loss is just a delayed effect from your previous work?

     

    image
    image

    I am a runner, knitter, scientist, DE-IVF veteran, and stage III colon cancer survivor.
  • imageepphd:

    But 4 runs in 10ish days is nothing to sneeze at, so maybe the loss is just a delayed effect from your previous work?

     

    Eh, these runs were easy and shorter than usual as well as less frequent.  Not like I was a total bum, but I wasn't pushing myself, as I had in the previous 4 months, with incrementally increased duration throughout.  They were "lazy runs," if there is such a thing.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • This happened to me when I broke my foot.  Some things to consider:

    1.  Your metabolism is still high from working out so you are still burning

    2.  You aren't as hungry so you aren't consuming as many calories or

    3.  You think you are eating enough calories for your activity level but you really aren't so by reducing your activity level you are no longer "starving" yourself and your body sheds weight more efficiently

    (For me, I realized I'm just not eating enough for my activity level)


  • I have no idea if this is what happened to you, but I learned quite by accident last year that I could drop five pounds pretty easily if I just stopped working out because my appetite plummets. 
  • I notice and immediate drop of 2-3 lbs after a few days away from running because my muscles are no longer retaining as much water. My appetite also dips, so it's easier for me to control portions. It's actually a challenge for me not to gain weight when I'm running a lot, since I'm hungry all the time.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I agree with the others about the appetite issue. There are also lots of theories out there about how cardio is not the most efficient way to lose weight.

     

    On the science part, I too have tried to google it. A professor once told me that you lose the weight through respiration. Although he's brilliant, he was an architecture professor (who had lost a ton of weight), so I'm not sure how accurate that is.

  • epphdepphd member
    imagemegan888:

    I agree with the others about the appetite issue. There are also lots of theories out there about how cardio is not the most efficient way to lose weight.

     

    On the science part, I too have tried to google it. A professor once told me that you lose the weight through respiration. Although he's brilliant, he was an architecture professor (who had lost a ton of weight), so I'm not sure how accurate that is.

    I'm a scientist by training and that (and the previous explanation) sound about right.  Basically, it's "fat stored in adipose tissue-->lots of intermediate metabolic steps--->respiration".  The phrase "burning fat" is actually not that inaccurate - your body uses fat for fuel, burns it, and you excrete the byproducts through waste in all its forms.

     

    image
    image

    I am a runner, knitter, scientist, DE-IVF veteran, and stage III colon cancer survivor.
  • Catabolism! I'm rusty with my animal metabolic pathways but here goes...Plants use energy from the sun to make glucose from CO2. The carbon from glucose is converted into other carbohydrates, fats and proteins by plants or animals. These are all energy stored in chemical form. After we eat the plants or animals, we extract energy from them by degrading them. When they are degraded (catabolism) the energy is released in the form of ATP and NADPH to do work including build human fats and proteins. (Your cells are full of little motors and such that are powered by ATP and the energy stored in its chemical bonds).  When we take in more energy than we need, we store that energy in the form of fats. When we take in less energy than we need, fat cells feed fats into the catabolic pathways. All this energy is need to make you. Molecules are constantly being broken down and rebuilt...even parts that seem to be static. Some volume is lost in waste such as nitrogen in your pee, CO2 released from your lungs, or body heat. The circle of life :)
  • Basically everyone else has it right. Your body uses glucose preferentially for fuel, and when you run out of glucose, you start to break down triglycerides and fatty acids in order to generate more glucose. You run through the glucose in your blood pretty quickly, and then you switch to a combination of fatty acid mobilization and production of glucose from sugar stored in your muscles. In long runs like marathons, you "hit the wall" when your body switches over completely to fatty acid metabolism, which is a lot less efficient than glucose.

    Like epphd said, you don't lose fat cells; you just make them smaller when you use up their lipid contents.

     (Med student/biochemistry degree here - I love this subject) 

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards