Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.
If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.
Thank you.
Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.
calls for congressional investigation into Pink Slime
...but it's not what you think.
------------------
Iowa gov launches probe into 'pink slime' smear; Gov. Branstad: ?These are people who do not like meat?
Beef Products Inc. announced last week that it would stop production
Comments (21)THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Tuesday, April 3, 2012, 10:52 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nati Harnik/AP
Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback, Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, South Dakota Lt. Gov. Matt Michels and Nebraska Lt. Gov. Rick Sheehy, during a tour Thursday, March 29, 2012, of the Beef Products Inc.'s plant in South Sioux City, Neb., where the the beef product known as pink slime or lean finely textured beef is made. .
Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad called Monday for a congressional investigation into how what he called "a smear campaign" against the meat product commonly called "pink slime" got started.
The company that makes the product, South Dakota-based Beef Products Inc., announced last week that it would stop production at plants in Iowa, Kansas and Texas amid public outcry. There are no precise numbers on how prevalent the product known in the industry as lean, finely textured beef is, but past estimates have ranged as high as 70 percent; one industry official estimated it was in at least half of the ground meat and burgers in the United States.
The phrase "pink slime," coined by a federal microbiologist, has appeared in the media at least since a critical 2009 New York Times report. Celebrity chef Jamie Oliver has railed against it, and it made headlines after McDonald's and other major chains discontinued their use last year.
But a recent piece by The Daily on the U.S. Department of Agriculture's purchase of meat that included "pink slime" for school lunches touched a nerve with Houston resident Bettina Siegel, whose blog "The Lunch Tray" focuses on kids' food. She started an online petition asking Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to halt use of "pink slime" in school food, and the USDA announced last month that starting in the fall it would give schools the option of choosing ground beef that doesn't contain it.
"We have a smear campaign going on against a product that is healthy and safe," Branstad said at his weekly news conference. "If they get by with this, what other food products are they going to attack next?"
The governor said he suggested an inquiry to U.S. Reps. Steve King and Leonard Boswell and raised the issue with Vilsack, a former Iowa governor. King and Boswell did not immediately return messages left Monday requesting comment.
Lean, finely textured beef is made by heating fatty bits of meat left over from other cuts to about 100 F and spinning it to remove most of the fat. The lean mix is then compressed into blocks for use in ground meat and treated with ammonium hydroxide gas to kill bacteria, such as E. coli and salmonella.
"It's clear this is a safe product," Branstad said. "It's a lean product, it helps reduce obesity and there is a spurious attack being levied against it by some groups. You can suspect who they might be. They are people who do not like meat."
Branstad went on the offense last week, discussing the issue at a news conference and touring a Nebraska processing plant with governors from Kansas and Texas and lieutenant governors from Nebraska and South Dakota.
Beef Products' plants in Iowa and Kansas each produced about 350,000 pounds of lean, finely textured beef per day, while the one in Texas produced about 200,000 pounds a day. The shutdown has affected 650 jobs, the company said.
Reports over weekend showed that Beef Products' top executives and workers have given $820,750 to congressional and presidential candidates over the past decade, with all but $28,400 going to Republicans. Branstad, a Republican, received $150,000 over the past two years from people tied to Beef Products, his spokesman Tim Albrecht said Monday.
Branstad said he's firing off a letter to all the other governors in the nation, urging them to be equally aggressive on the issue. He also called on students at agricultural colleges in Iowa to use their social media skills "to counter what Hollywood and the media elites and the people who are spreading this misinformation are doing."
"It's their future that's being threatened by this," Branstad said.
I am the 99%.
Re: calls for congressional investigation into Pink Slime
While I would like to see "pink slime" gone of course, I don't really understand why it took almost two decades for people to be in uproar about this. This has been going on for years, and I'm not understanding why the media is deciding to care now?
I'm going to just C&P my own blog post on this issue, LOL:
It?s taken a few days, but the political wind is beginning to blow against the ?lean, finely textured beef? backlash. As we?ve all heard by now, folks have learned that much of the ground beef available in grocery stores and school lunches is (or was) mixed with an ammonia-treated slurry of de-fatted trimmings, and folks are displeased. Two things about this story are surprising?the swiftness with which restaurants and grocery stores have moved to stop selling so-called ?pink slime,? and the whining coming from some Republican governors who seem to think the public has been hoodwinked into believing that the beef mixture isn?t what they want. This is the same brand of politician more typically heard to insist that the free market should be allowed work without interference. What appears to be lost on them is that this is the free market working without interference.
Whether or not ?lean, finely textured beef? is as safe to eat as pure beef is a question best left to the food biologists, although ?food-grade ammonia? is one of the more side-eye-worthy phrases I?ve encountered in a while. The point is that enough people don?t want to eat it that there isn?t any reason to produce it. The government has not stepped in to legislate against it; no one?s right to eat ammonia-treated meat has been infringed upon?carnivores just don?t want it. Just as Monsanto has all but lost its fight to convince the public that dairy products from cows treated with rBST are just as awesome as non-rBST dairy products (and even though it enlisted the government to convey its message), the meat industry is taking a hit now that consumers have learned about ?lean, finely textured beef? and find it distasteful.
Yes, plants will close and the people who work in them will lose their jobs. Consumers will no doubt be punished with higher beef prices?although why a product that seems to require more effort and materials to produce would actually be cheaper than pure beef is a question worth pursuing? but as our growing appetite for organic products demonstrates, we?re willing to pay more for food with which we hope hasn?t been tampered.
Such is the capricious nature of a free economy, which Govs. Brownback, Perry, et al. claim they want to protect.
it was a critical mass thing.
it took a certain number of people being educated about it, and outraged enough to tell their friends (via social media, etc) to reach critical mass. I remember hearing about this stuff years ago via Food, Inc.
I am the 99%.