Politics & Current Events
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

A fun Fat Tuesday article

http://www.foodandnutritionresearch.net/index.php/fnr/article/view/5794

 

As a teaser, here is the abstract:

 

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of total, chocolate, or sugar candy consumption on intakes of total energy, fat, and added sugars; diet quality; weight/adiposity parameters; and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in children 2-13 years of age (n=7,049) and adolescents 14-18 years (n=4,132) participating in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Methods: Twenty-four hour dietary recalls were used to determine intake. Diet quality was determined using the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005). Covariate-adjusted means, standard errors, and prevalence rates were determined for each candy consumption group. Odds ratios were used to determine the likelihood of associations with weight status and diet quality. Results: In younger children, total, chocolate, and sugar candy consumption was 11.4 g?1.61, 4.8 g?0.35, and 6.6 g?0.46, respectively. In adolescents, total, chocolate, and sugar candy consumption was 13.0 g?0.87, 7.0 g?0.56, and 5.9 g?0.56, respectively. Total candy consumers had higher intakes of total energy (2248.9 kcals?26.8 vs 1993.1 kcals?15.1, p<0.0001) and added sugars (27.7 g?0.44 vs 23.4 g?0.38, p<0.0001) than non-consumers. Mean HEI-2005 score was not different in total candy and sugar candy consumers as compared to non-consumers, but was significantly lower in chocolate candy consumers (46.7?0.8 vs 48.3?0.4, p=0.0337). Weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, percentiles/z-score for weight-for-age and BMI-for-age were lower for candy consumers as compared to non-consumers. Candy consumers were 22 and 26%, respectively, less likely to be overweight and obese than non-candy consumers. Blood pressure, blood lipid levels, and cardiovascular risk factors were not different between total, chocolate, and sugar candy consumers and non-consumers (except that sugar candy consumers had lower C-reactive protein levels than non-consumers). Conclusion: This study suggests that candy consumption did not adversely affect health risk markers in children and adolescents.

image

Re: A fun Fat Tuesday article

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards