That thread title was borrowed from the WSJ tweet, FYI.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/04/25/supreme-court-live-blog-the-immigration-case/
Supreme Court justices seemed inclined to allow at least one provision of Arizona?s tough anti-immigration law to stand but asked few questions about other provisions at arguments Wednesday that went about 20 minutes over the scheduled time.
Here is our live blog of the day?s events ? with the events inside the court on ?tape delay? if you will, due to the court?s reporting restrictions.
For those just joining us: Supreme Court justices seemed inclined to allow at least one provision of Arizona?s tough anti-immigration law. We are now recapping the details of the arguments, as they happened.
Re: s/o AZ law: WSJ blog indicates SCOTUS sympathetic to part of it.