Politics & Current Events
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

The verdict in the Charles Taylor trial: guilty

They're reading it out now. So far the trial court has just found that a wide array of crimes against humanity were committed by Liberoans in Sierra Leone.<p>

 

ETA: and listening to this verdict I can understand why this trial took five years. Holy crap at some of the things that went on.

Re: The verdict in the Charles Taylor trial: guilty

  • It seems like they're finding insufficient evidence for for a lot of the accusations against Taylor.
  • Are you watching it or reading it?
  • Watching it.  The presiding judge has been reading for an hour and a half.
  • They have found him criminally responsible for aiding and abetting the RUF rebels in Sierra Leone.  They didn't find that he had command responsibility over them.  He's still reading his verdict though.  They haven't yet gotten to the actual charges in the indictment.
  • Guilty of aiding and abetting the commission of the following crimes and planning the commission thereof:

    1. Acts of Terrorism

    2. Murder

    3. Violence to life, health, and physical well being of persons

    4. Rape

    5. Sexual slavery

    6. Outrages upon personal dignity

    7. Same as #3 but under a different article

    8. Other inhumane acts

    9. Conscripting or enlisting children under 15 into armed forces  

    10. Enslavement

    11. Pillage

     

  • One of my biglaw friends ended up working as a defense counsel for another person at this tribunal. He said it was the most disturbing year of his life, and some of the arguments he ended up making were pretty grotesque.  

    My friends in Liberia are all shut in their homes today. Hopefully the verdict will go over peacefully.  

    "We tend to be patronizing about the poor in a very specific sense, which is that we tend to think,
  • imagemxolisi:

    One of my biglaw friends ended up working as a defense counsel for another person at this tribunal. He said it was the most disturbing year of his life, and some of the arguments he ended up making were pretty grotesque.  

     

    I wish I could unhear some of the descriptions I heard today.  I'm a little worried about having dreams of human entrails being strung across the road as a road block. Sad

  • imagePublius:
    imagemxolisi:

    One of my biglaw friends ended up working as a defense counsel for another person at this tribunal. He said it was the most disturbing year of his life, and some of the arguments he ended up making were pretty grotesque.  

     

    I wish I could unhear some of the descriptions I heard today.  I'm a little worried about having dreams of human entrails being strung across the road as a road block. Sad

    Actually one of the defense arguments he concocted was that the use of human entrails in that fashion was not an act of terrorism because it was simply done because the defendant didn't have any rope...

    I sometimes wonder how my friends in the Hague maintain a work life balance under these conditions! 

    "We tend to be patronizing about the poor in a very specific sense, which is that we tend to think,
  • imagemxolisi:
    imagePublius:
    imagemxolisi:

    One of my biglaw friends ended up working as a defense counsel for another person at this tribunal. He said it was the most disturbing year of his life, and some of the arguments he ended up making were pretty grotesque.  

     

    I wish I could unhear some of the descriptions I heard today.  I'm a little worried about having dreams of human entrails being strung across the road as a road block. Sad

    Actually one of the defense arguments he concocted was that the use of human entrails in that fashion was not an act of terrorism because it was simply done because the defendant didn't have any rope...

    I sometimes wonder how my friends in the Hague maintain a work life balance under these conditions! 

    Tongue TiedIndifferentTongue Tied 

    image
  • The guilty verdict is nice, but the details are horrifying. May he rot in hell.
  • imagemxolisi:
    imagePublius:
    imagemxolisi:

    One of my biglaw friends ended up working as a defense counsel for another person at this tribunal. He said it was the most disturbing year of his life, and some of the arguments he ended up making were pretty grotesque.  

     

    I wish I could unhear some of the descriptions I heard today.  I'm a little worried about having dreams of human entrails being strung across the road as a road block. Sad

    Actually one of the defense arguments he concocted was that the use of human entrails in that fashion was not an act of terrorism because it was simply done because the defendant didn't have any rope...

    I sometimes wonder how my friends in the Hague maintain a work life balance under these conditions! 

    This argument actually worked. The judges found that there wasn't enough evidence to prove that it was done in a systematic way to terrorize the community.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards