A home if you knew you would only be there for 2 years?
My husband and I are relocating to a new area and we are having some disagreement about renting vs buying. We will only be in the area for 2 years ( it is not an option to stay longer), and we could buy a home with a mortgage( including taxes and insurance) for $300 a month less than renting a similar home.
So would you spend the money upfront for a mortgage and have lower payments but risk not being able to sell easily in 2 years. Or would you rent for more money but have the peace of mind knowing that when you had to move again you could do so fairly easily?
Tia!
Re: Would you buy...
We thought about this recently, when we were planning to move in 3 years, and I found a calculator online that was helpful - something like this one: http://www.smartmoney.com/calculator/real-estate/should-i-rent-or-buy-a-house-1304481100859/
We ended up deciding it wasn't worth it for us, but I'm sure it depends a lot on where you live and what houses you're looking at. Personally, I wouldn't do it unless: 1) you stand to save a significant amount of money by buying, and 2) you know you'll be able to pay the mortgage for a while after you move out in case you end up having trouble selling it.

"You know you're in love when you don't want to fall asleep because reality is finally better than your dreams." - Dr. SeussAll of this. You need to factorin realtor fees, closing costs, house maintance etc. Also what if it doesn't sell. Oh and breaking your mortgage if you go with a fixed term. Nope, no way I would buy.
**6.30.12** I have found the one whom my soul loves.
Thanks for the feedback. It's pretty much what I was feeling, but I needed someone to say it, too
.
"Be the Lego Lady"