Politics & Current Events
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

ObamaCare Meltdown: Even media liberals are appalled

Now that we're all sick of talking about the shutdown, the spotlight is returning to what would have been the top story without the 16-day government closure.

Ladies and gentlemen, ObamaCare is still screwed up.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/10/21/obamacare-meltdown-even-media-liberals-are-appalled/?intcmp=obinsite


What say the board?


Cnon

Take back the Senate in 2014
«1

Re: ObamaCare Meltdown: Even media liberals are appalled

  • I'm shocked media liberals are appalled.  It truly is a disaster.  The cat's been let out of the bag and there is not much that we can do about it now.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • The websites are working badly, but the law itself is still good.

    The linked article is terrible. That said, the website roll-out was unacceptable and clearly did not receive sufficient resources to achieve their objectives in the timeframe needed.
    -My son was born in April 2012. He pretty much rules. -This might be the one place on the internet where it's feasible someone would pretend to be an Adult Man.
  • The link is terrible.  You would think though that with 3 years they would have had enough time to get that website ready.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Also, I have read that the firewall protection from hackers is really poorly done. Citizens' private data is easily accessible by people looking to profit from it.

     

  • LuckyDad said:
    The websites are working badly, but the law itself is still good.

    The linked article is terrible. That said, the website roll-out was unacceptable and clearly did not receive sufficient resources to achieve their objectives in the timeframe needed.
    The bolded is debatable. In a nation that applauds itself for so many people having a choice...forcing folks to buy health insurance, who do not want to, goes against this ideology. In addition, it is now surfacing that many people will actually be dropped from their plans. Obama's verbage that "you can still keep whatever plan you want." is just not true.
  • LuckyDad said:
    The websites are working badly, but the law itself is still good.

    The linked article is terrible. That said, the website roll-out was unacceptable and clearly did not receive sufficient resources to achieve their objectives in the timeframe needed.
    The bolded is debatable. In a nation that applauds itself for so many people having a choice...forcing folks to buy health insurance, who do not want to, goes against this ideology. In addition, it is now surfacing that many people will actually be dropped from their plans. Obama's verbage that "you can still keep whatever plan you want." is just not true.
    Exactly and it came out just a couple days ago that the admin knew all along millions of people would be dropped.  That is what pisses me off.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • snp605snp605 member
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Comments Name Dropper 5 Love Its
    edited October 2013
    vlagrl29 said:
    LuckyDad said:
    The websites are working badly, but the law itself is still good.

    The linked article is terrible. That said, the website roll-out was unacceptable and clearly did not receive sufficient resources to achieve their objectives in the timeframe needed.
    The bolded is debatable. In a nation that applauds itself for so many people having a choice...forcing folks to buy health insurance, who do not want to, goes against this ideology. In addition, it is now surfacing that many people will actually be dropped from their plans. Obama's verbage that "you can still keep whatever plan you want." is just not true.
    Exactly and it came out just a couple days ago that the admin knew all along millions of people would be dropped.  That is what pisses me off.
    And the people who assured you that no one was losing coverage (not just Obama but the plan's supporters) are the same people who are telling you how well it is going to work despite significant evidence to the contrary.
    image
  • vlagrl29vlagrl29 member
    Sixth Anniversary 2500 Comments 500 Love Its Name Dropper
    edited October 2013
    snp605 said:
    vlagrl29 said:
    LuckyDad said:
    The websites are working badly, but the law itself is still good.

    The linked article is terrible. That said, the website roll-out was unacceptable and clearly did not receive sufficient resources to achieve their objectives in the timeframe needed.
    The bolded is debatable. In a nation that applauds itself for so many people having a choice...forcing folks to buy health insurance, who do not want to, goes against this ideology. In addition, it is now surfacing that many people will actually be dropped from their plans. Obama's verbage that "you can still keep whatever plan you want." is just not true.
    Exactly and it came out just a couple days ago that the admin knew all along millions of people would be dropped.  That is what pisses me off.
    And the people who assured you that no one was losing coverage (not just Obama but the plan's supporters) are the same people who are telling you how well it is going to work despite significant evidence to the contrary.
    It was all done on purpose to start universal health care.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • What is going on? I just spoke to a cousin who said their deductible on meds alone increased from 800 to 2,800!!!!!!!! Outrageous, no??
  • What is going on? I just spoke to a cousin who said their deductible on meds alone increased from 800 to 2,800!!!!!!!! Outrageous, no??
    outrageous yes, it's now the new normal and it will only get worse.  I try to stay healthy so I never have to go to the doctor. Of course shit will happen that will be unpreventable.  I'm going to a yoga studio and eating as clean as possible for my health.  Except for tonight being halloween and all, I did gorge a bit on candy :)
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • So, like I'm not going to try and argue like there aren't people getting hosed by the law, but I have to ask. Is said hosing happening mainly in the states that haven't expanded medicare? Cause I'm having a hard time seeing how my in-laws are saving thousands, and others are getting screwed. 

    Single payer would have taken care of most of these problems but, oh well. compromise. 

    Also, America is country of choice? We say we are, but we still have states getting all up in womens health. So, I'm sorry-not-sorry if having to have insurance ranks lower on my injustice scale then forced trans-vaginal ultrasounds.
  • The freedom to not have insurance is really what people are so upset about not having?
    Car insurance is mandated specifically because people who don't have insurance get into car accidents, and bring the cost up for everyone. Likewise, people without health insurance get sick or have emergencies, and the rest of us pick up the slack and pay more.
    Are you all gonna start whining about having to buy car insurance because you like taking your own risks and you think you're a good driver? Plus you think you're more responsible and self sufficient than the rest of the country so the government should leave you alone?
    Sure. Okay.
    The launch of the website was total crap. But it's just a website, and when the government hires contractors, crap work happens frequently. And sure, insurance companies will change their plans so that they comply with the law. It will affect a small amount of the population.
    We will know more about how the law is working in a year or two. Like any huge change in policy, it takes a while for us to see the overall effects.
  • In reality, car-insurance coverage is not mandated to all Americans, all adults, or even all licensed drivers (one can maintain a license but not auto insurance if he or she does not plan to drive a car). Auto insurance is but one price that must be paid in order to enjoy the privilege of driving. 

    Alternatively, the mandatory health insurance proposal would essentially require that, in exchange for the privilege of … citizenship? Residency in the U.S.? Life? … one must procure health insurance for herself and her family. 

    Can pedestrians “opt out” of mandatory health-insurance coverage, and more importantly, where in the Constitution does the Federal government have the right to mandate health insurance coverage in the first place?
  • Well, technically you can decide not to have health insurance. Nobody is able to force you to buy insurance. You can choose to pay more in taxes instead.
    This is not radical in any way. Look at Social Security. You can't opt out of that. Same with medicare. Nothing out of the ordinary is really being done here...
    well, unless you consider the fact that the insurance market is privatized and will remain so under the ACA. It's a free market approach to solving the health care problem.
    And no, of course the constitution does not say anything about health insurance. I would really like it if people would stop pretending they're Constitutional Law experts. You can say something is unconstitutional all you want, but only certain people with certain educational qualifications can make that assertion with any kind of accuracy.

  • Yes, Social Security and Medicare have been hugely successful, so let's add another entitlement that has been a train wreck from the get go.

    Millions of Americans are being informed they're being dropped from their insurance plans because the plans don't meet minimum Obamacare standards, but President Obama promised that "if you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance."   Was that a boldfaced lie? 
  • Yes, Social Security and Medicare have been hugely successful, so let's add another entitlement that has been a train wreck from the get go.

    Millions of Americans are being informed they're being dropped from their insurance plans because the plans don't meet minimum Obamacare standards, but President Obama promised that "if you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance."   Was that a boldfaced lie? 
    Cause getting dropped for getting cancer was a thousand times better. 

    Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of shit to get fixed in the ACA, but lets not pretend everything was peachy-keen before. 

    And yeah, he lied. It's not cool.
  • chibiyui said:
    Yes, Social Security and Medicare have been hugely successful, so let's add another entitlement that has been a train wreck from the get go.

    Millions of Americans are being informed they're being dropped from their insurance plans because the plans don't meet minimum Obamacare standards, but President Obama promised that "if you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance."   Was that a boldfaced lie? 
    Cause getting dropped for getting cancer was a thousand times better. 

    Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of shit to get fixed in the ACA, but lets not pretend everything was peachy-keen before. 

    And yeah, he lied. It's not cool.
    Who is the ACA named after? OBAMA. Obamacare. The ACA is built on a lie. Honestly, is that the sort of legislation you want? You tip your hat to it? A lie? Really?
  • So we are taking away people's insurance choices (well, severely limiting the choice to "gov't acceptability", that will cost more for higher deductibles and higher co-pays still have over 30 million uninsured and  for many still covered it will limit physician choice (no - for many you cannot keep your Dr if you like them., nor your hospital if it does not participate)
    Yes, we needed to make changes to allow for access to those with prior conditions and remove life time caps --- but that could have been accomplished without taking apart the whole system. The ACA is not affordable - and gives gov't far too much control over our lives.
    Young people and the middle class will absorb most of the costs.
    Watch as we get actual numbers on who has bought or signed up for coverage.  Mostly medicaid or subsidized with few paying enrollees.  So guess where the money wilil come from??  You guessed it -- more taxes. Fewer jobs, slow economic growth - if any, more national debt. 



    Within 3 years we will pretty much have destroyed the private individual insurance market with over 100K drops (when policies don't comply or ins. co. cannot make a profit) -  and then the additional drops by employers for insurance to employees starting later in 2014 when the delay expires.    Everyone will be gradually forced into the exchanges by restricting choices and controlled by the government.
    The lying has become a joke - and it will take much more than "I am sorry you lost your insurance" from Obama to regain even a smidgen of credibility or trust.  This law will haunt the Democrats for a LONG time and although a few will enjoy the benefits, most Americans will be feeling duped and disappointed and will vote accordingly.
  • So we are taking away people's insurance choices (well, severely limiting the choice to "gov't acceptability", that will cost more for higher deductibles and higher co-pays still have over 30 million uninsured and  for many still covered it will limit physician choice (no - for many you cannot keep your Dr if you like them., nor your hospital if it does not participate)
    Yes, we needed to make changes to allow for access to those with prior conditions and remove life time caps --- but that could have been accomplished without taking apart the whole system. The ACA is not affordable - and gives gov't far too much control over our lives.
    Young people and the middle class will absorb most of the costs.
    Watch as we get actual numbers on who has bought or signed up for coverage.  Mostly medicaid or subsidized with few paying enrollees.  So guess where the money wilil come from??  You guessed it -- more taxes. Fewer jobs, slow economic growth - if any, more national debt. 



    Within 3 years we will pretty much have destroyed the private individual insurance market with over 100K drops (when policies don't comply or ins. co. cannot make a profit) -  and then the additional drops by employers for insurance to employees starting later in 2014 when the delay expires.    Everyone will be gradually forced into the exchanges by restricting choices and controlled by the government.
    The lying has become a joke - and it will take much more than "I am sorry you lost your insurance" from Obama to regain even a smidgen of credibility or trust.  This law will haunt the Democrats for a LONG time and although a few will enjoy the benefits, most Americans will be feeling duped and disappointed and will vote accordingly.
  • Yes, Social Security and Medicare have been hugely successful, so let's add another entitlement that has been a train wreck from the get go.

    Millions of Americans are being informed they're being dropped from their insurance plans because the plans don't meet minimum Obamacare standards, but President Obama promised that "if you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance."   Was that a boldfaced lie? 

    That's about the size of it............................................................



    Cnon
    Take back the Senate in 2014
  • I heard he apologized about the shitty website today
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • chibiyui said:
    Yes, Social Security and Medicare have been hugely successful, so let's add another entitlement that has been a train wreck from the get go.

    Millions of Americans are being informed they're being dropped from their insurance plans because the plans don't meet minimum Obamacare standards, but President Obama promised that "if you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance."   Was that a boldfaced lie? 
    Cause getting dropped for getting cancer was a thousand times better. 

    Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of shit to get fixed in the ACA, but lets not pretend everything was peachy-keen before. 

    And yeah, he lied. It's not cool.
    I am a cancer survivor (17 years this month) and I have NEVER been dropped from any of my health insurance plans, nor have I ever been denied coverage because of a pre-existing condition (thanks to an existing law on the books called HIPAA - check it out).

    The ACA is a joke, if things weren't peachy-keen before they are going to suck balls now.  I am willing to bet a years salary that come next year my employer sponsored health insurance plan (which I like) will be dropped. So, that will force me into a government run system in which I am not interested in participating and will be forced to pay more than I was paying with my employer sponsored plan.   

    I realize that for many Americans, healthcare is broken, but why in the hell would the government institute a system that breaks for those where it was working?
  • chibiyui said:
    Yes, Social Security and Medicare have been hugely successful, so let's add another entitlement that has been a train wreck from the get go.

    Millions of Americans are being informed they're being dropped from their insurance plans because the plans don't meet minimum Obamacare standards, but President Obama promised that "if you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance."   Was that a boldfaced lie? 
    Cause getting dropped for getting cancer was a thousand times better. 

    Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of shit to get fixed in the ACA, but lets not pretend everything was peachy-keen before. 

    And yeah, he lied. It's not cool.
    I am a cancer survivor (17 years this month) and I have NEVER been dropped from any of my health insurance plans, nor have I ever been denied coverage because of a pre-existing condition (thanks to an existing law on the books called HIPAA - check it out).

    The ACA is a joke, if things weren't peachy-keen before they are going to suck balls now.  I am willing to bet a years salary that come next year my employer sponsored health insurance plan (which I like) will be dropped. So, that will force me into a government run system in which I am not interested in participating and will be forced to pay more than I was paying with my employer sponsored plan.   

    I realize that for many Americans, healthcare is broken, but why in the hell would the government institute a system that breaks for those where it was working?


    Oh I love the bolded. Plus, the ACA isn't even fixing health insurance for people that it was broken for before. There is a percentage of people that cannot afford plans in the ACA and do not have employer-sponsored plans. What do they do? They get fined under the ACA if they don't carry insurance!

    Also, health insurance isn't a right of Americans citizens. It is a perk/blessing/opportunity of living in this developed/1st world nation. It is an out-poring or a result of an extremely materialistic country that has the bounty to provide this.

    I don't understand why people think government-run health care is a great idea. Have we not seen the red tape, the blunders, and the sheer ineffectiveness of smaller government run entities such as the DMVs and the USPS? This are peanuts compared to this. My thinking is that if you cannot trust someone or a group with the small stuff (sending mail and licensing), why on earth would you trust them with the big stuff (health insurance and education)?

     

  • chibiyui said:
    Yes, Social Security and Medicare have been hugely successful, so let's add another entitlement that has been a train wreck from the get go.

    Millions of Americans are being informed they're being dropped from their insurance plans because the plans don't meet minimum Obamacare standards, but President Obama promised that "if you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance."   Was that a boldfaced lie? 
    Cause getting dropped for getting cancer was a thousand times better. 

    Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of shit to get fixed in the ACA, but lets not pretend everything was peachy-keen before. 

    And yeah, he lied. It's not cool.
    I am a cancer survivor (17 years this month) and I have NEVER been dropped from any of my health insurance plans, nor have I ever been denied coverage because of a pre-existing condition (thanks to an existing law on the books called HIPAA - check it out).

    The ACA is a joke, if things weren't peachy-keen before they are going to suck balls now.  I am willing to bet a years salary that come next year my employer sponsored health insurance plan (which I like) will be dropped. So, that will force me into a government run system in which I am not interested in participating and will be forced to pay more than I was paying with my employer sponsored plan.   

    I realize that for many Americans, healthcare is broken, but why in the hell would the government institute a system that breaks for those where it was working?
    That's great for you and I"m glad you are a survivor, but the reason I think you were never dropped is because you are on an employer plan.  People like myself and DH who buy their own insurance would probably have been dropped.  I can't even get my hernia operated on until Jan. because it was pre-existing. So I'm assuming if I had had cancer on a previous plan our current plan wouldn't have paid out for at least a year or may not have even taken us. So I for one am glad about the pre existing clause going bye-bye BUT that doesn't mean I'm all about the ACA.  All the plans are way more than what we pay now so it's not a good thing for us.  Also, I had read that even if you apply for the ACA and buy one of their plans you may still have to wait 6-12 months for pay out for a possible pre-existing condition.  I believe this is one step closer to UHC and they new it would be bad so i think it was in the plans to screw it all up so we can just go to UHC.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • vlagrl29 - Did you have continuous coverage (regardless of whether it was an employer plan or not)?  Under HIPAA a pre-exisiting condition cannot be held against you when switching providers as long as you can show previous coverage and no more than 6 months has lapsed.
  • well, for starters you CAN choose not to drive and thereby avoid having car insurance in states that require auto insurance. There is no guarantee, proof or evidence that requiring people to buy insurance or pay a penalty will bring down health costs because auto insurance and health insurance, and more specifically Obamacare are not apples to apples. My auto insurance is not required to pay for brake jobs or oil changes or pay for repairs on vehicles in extreme need of repair except under very specific circumstances. Because so many of the types of repairs paid for by auto insurers are also paid for in an out of insurance type of situation (paint, axle replacement, radiator repair, etc) there is a system of checks which keeps costs down. When people are paying for it themselves they are "not going to pay a lot for this muffler" and will shop costs for repairs. This sets a standard of prices largely driven by the consumer. Who sets prices in our for-profit healthcare industry? Who or what market force is keeping those prices in check? If you have to have your bumper replaced you probably know what this is going to cost and know upfront so you can choose your provider and whether this is something you want to pursue. Just TRY to get an upfront cost from a medical provider. You cannot compare automobiles or anything that goes with them to human beings.


    image
  • chibiyui said:
    Yes, Social Security and Medicare have been hugely successful, so let's add another entitlement that has been a train wreck from the get go.

    Millions of Americans are being informed they're being dropped from their insurance plans because the plans don't meet minimum Obamacare standards, but President Obama promised that "if you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance."   Was that a boldfaced lie? 
    Cause getting dropped for getting cancer was a thousand times better. 

    Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of shit to get fixed in the ACA, but lets not pretend everything was peachy-keen before. 

    And yeah, he lied. It's not cool.
    Who is the ACA named after? OBAMA. Obamacare. The ACA is built on a lie. Honestly, is that the sort of legislation you want? You tip your hat to it? A lie? Really?
    You were cool with people getting dropped cause they had cancer? Really? You DIDN'T want legislation to fix that?
  • chibiyui said:
    chibiyui said:
    Yes, Social Security and Medicare have been hugely successful, so let's add another entitlement that has been a train wreck from the get go.

    Millions of Americans are being informed they're being dropped from their insurance plans because the plans don't meet minimum Obamacare standards, but President Obama promised that "if you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance."   Was that a boldfaced lie? 
    Cause getting dropped for getting cancer was a thousand times better. 

    Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of shit to get fixed in the ACA, but lets not pretend everything was peachy-keen before. 

    And yeah, he lied. It's not cool.
    Who is the ACA named after? OBAMA. Obamacare. The ACA is built on a lie. Honestly, is that the sort of legislation you want? You tip your hat to it? A lie? Really?
    You were cool with people getting dropped cause they had cancer? Really? You DIDN'T want legislation to fix that?

    First of I, I did not bold the part about cancer in the above PP. I think you did that.

    Second, I bolded the part in the PP about your comment in reference to Obama lying and how you just said oh so casually, "And yeah, he lied. It's not cool." My post referenced the lying comment. Not the cancer one.

    Next, I am not sure how you got that I am okay with people being dropped because they have cancer or another other medical problem (total leap of the imagination there on your part).

    And you do realize that people being dropped by plans who have cancer or another illness is JUST AS BAD as someone with cancer or another illness not being able to afford health insurance under the ACA or an employer plan, right? The ACA was supposed to remedy this for people. It hasn't. I has fallen woefully short of any expectations set forth for it.

    Debating online is tough enough without a face-to-face interaction, so it behooves us all to pay attention to the actual statements provided by posters and not make comments based on assumptions.


     

  • vlagrl29 - Did you have continuous coverage (regardless of whether it was an employer plan or not)?  Under HIPAA a pre-exisiting condition cannot be held against you when switching providers as long as you can show previous coverage and no more than 6 months has lapsed.
    continuous coverage my whole life! yep and it doesn't apply to us that buy our own.  That's the way it's always been.  I've bought my own insurance most of my adult life.  My insurance agent has told us about that, even my BFF has many health issues and has had to stay on her plan for a long time because if she switched they may not cover her.  So, I'm so happy they will get that taken away from them on Jan. 1 :)  They even tried to deny coverage for a sinus infection I had....saying it may be pre-existing.  so stupid!
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • buying in the individual market is much different than thru an employer.  Yeah they may take you even is you have a pre existing condition but that doesn't mean they have to pay for it during the first year you are on a plan.  Even the customer service rep from humana let me know about that a couple years ago.  I'm also happy that if we happened to get pregnant it's no longer a pre existing condition and we can get coverage for that now too.  We currently can't afford maternity coverage.  DD was a COBRA baby.  I was on cobra from my old job and we decided to take advantage of the maternity coverage.  Thank god we were able to conceive and deliver her within those 16 months!
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards