A girlfriend of mine and I went on a road trip this weekend up north. We got into a discussion about money, luxuries and the poor. I believe in being responsible, paying your bills, and holding off on luxuries until you can afford them. She says just because people are poor or don't make as much money doesn't mean that they shouldn't have nice things like cable, smart phones or nice purses etc. We both got a little worked up and started to debate. In all honesty, she made a good point but I feel she did a poor job explaining it. She said, Why do rich people get to be in this "little club" and are the only ones allowed by society to have nice things? I said a lot of people have nice things but are not rich. They worked hard and saved for what they wanted. It's called being responsable. Then she said, are you saying poor people don't work hard? We had to agree to continue the discussion at another time and changed the subject.
The debate started because there are people in the city of Detroit who had their water shut off. Some owed thousands of dollar in back utility bills and still have cable. If it were me, I would cancel the cable and get up to date on my bills, to get the water turned back on. She says water is a basic human need, and it's okay to have cable. They need to turn the water back on and never should of turned it off in the first place. (There is more to the news story).
Since the other day, it's been bothering me and I am curious of others POV on this subject. (A little back story: She's a lawyer and I'm a paralegal, we debate different topics all the time. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we don't, and yes we are still very close.)
Re: Thoughts on a money debate I had with a friend.
I actually had a similar conversation with some of the girls that I used to wait tables with. They were all jealous that I was going to Ireland for a week on vacation. I had to point out that I was working 6 days a week. Most of them were only working 4-5 days. I wasn't driving a new car like them or buying a new cellphone. I didn't get my nails done or go out to the bar at night like some of them were doing. I chose to work the extra day a week and saved up for 2 years so that we could go on the trip. So they thought I was doing it because I was "rich" and didn't think that about all the things I gave up to make that.
Do I think that sometime people are going through hard times and need help? Absolutely. That said...give up the cable and focus on real needs (water, food, shelter)
In the end they did succeed in up selling me in my pre-MM mental state, and I know it's a very different scale, but basically I do agree with you. They should have cancelled their cable-that would actually be one of the first things to go for me if financial trouble hit (we just have internet anyway). Non essentials need to go if you can't pay your bills.
I can see an argument for alternatives to shutting off the water for the health of any kids involved, but see that as a separate issue. I would had the city try collections, payment plans, even wage garnishment first-but I'm not from Detroit so I don't know the full backstory.
TTC since 1/13 DX:PCOS 5/13 (long, anovulatory cycles)

Clomid 50mg 9/13 = BFP! EDD 6/7/14 M/C 5w6d Found 11/4/13
1/14 PCOS / Gluten Free Diet to hopefully regulate my system.
Chemical Pregnancy 03/14
Surprise BFP 6/14, Beta #1: 126 Beta #2: 340 Stick baby, stick! EDD 2/17/15
Riley Elaine born 2/16/15
TTC 2.0 6/15
Chemical Pregnancy 9/15
Chemical Pregnancy 6/16
BFP 9/16 EDD 6/3/17
Beta #1: 145 Beta #2: 376 Beta #3: 2,225 Beta #4: 4,548
www.5yearstonever.blogspot.com
@brij2006 that must be so frustrating for your H to see. I hate when people abuse the system that way; it gives forgiveness programs a bad name for the many who truly need them.
When I was poor I had no luxuries. Heck my mom gave me heck for buying nail polish (yes, we were that poor) and she was making her point that money was for necessities first, then savings and if you still had something left (which we did not) then you could consider luxuries.
Poverty was a big part of my motivation in life to not be poor. We are not high income people but have done very well financially (and are in better financial positions than our high income friends)
I understand unfortunate circumstances can happen to anyone thru no fault of their own, but there are also many people who could make better choices and change their circumstances but can't/won't do what it takes to make the needed changed to get out of their situation.
I am all about helping those who are doing something to help themselves as well as those disabled or otherwise unable to change their lives. Not so much for those who just feel entitled.
TTC since 1/13 DX:PCOS 5/13 (long, anovulatory cycles)

Clomid 50mg 9/13 = BFP! EDD 6/7/14 M/C 5w6d Found 11/4/13
1/14 PCOS / Gluten Free Diet to hopefully regulate my system.
Chemical Pregnancy 03/14
Surprise BFP 6/14, Beta #1: 126 Beta #2: 340 Stick baby, stick! EDD 2/17/15
Riley Elaine born 2/16/15
TTC 2.0 6/15
Chemical Pregnancy 9/15
Chemical Pregnancy 6/16
BFP 9/16 EDD 6/3/17
Beta #1: 145 Beta #2: 376 Beta #3: 2,225 Beta #4: 4,548
www.5yearstonever.blogspot.com
Nobody deserves a coach purse, jordan shoes or an expensive car. I used to work at a poor, title 1 school and it drove me absolutely crazy that kids who were getting free lunch, who had parents on welfare, had a nicer cell phone/purse/whatever than I did. If you are on government assistance- you SHOULD NOT have the money to buy that. If you do have the money to buy that stuff then you are committing fraud because you shouldn't be on government assistance. I'm not saying that there shouldn't be help out there for when people need it- but ugh.
I think a key phrase is "at the expense of." If a person with a low income level decides that s/he wants to work, save a bit of money on the side, while paying the regular bills and then have a spendy splurge on that special item like a handbag, then that's fine. Everybody "deserves" to decide where they want their fun saving money to go toward.
But, no one should feel entitled to anything "at the expense of" the legitimate daily life bills.
Before SAHMhood, I was a banker for a large bank. Bank branches "own" or manage and oversee the accounts that are opened in their individual locations. This is why when you call or go in for an overdraft fee, they want to see which branch you opened up the account at. Your "home" branch has a bottom line. Just like the overall bank/company has a bottom line.
At one branch I worked at, in the metro Denver area, the DAILY amount of uncollected charged-off accounts owed to the bank just from this branch was always fluxuating around $24,000. I kid you not. $24k. This means that the bank had paid, on their customers' behalf, purchases made by debit cards to outside merchants and the customers of these checking accounts were NOT paying back the bank for these debit card purchases.
People get angry about bank fees. We have no one to blame except the people who think they are entitled to things they cannot afford and have no intention of paying back the banks for their purchases. It's called stealing.
OP, you are right on track. I'm sorry, but your friend doesn't understand basic economics or responsible financial practices.
I know I sounds harsh, the reality is that my DH and I help lots of people in many ways who are truly deserving. But, when it comes to entitlement, and not paying for services rendered or goods bought, I am pretty blunt. It's just not right.
If your friend is truly a bleeding heart, she would see that these poor behaviors do more harm than good.
I will not forget the times I discussed fees with an elderly person. "I know I made a mistake - it's my fault - I misread my checkbook - why is there a $35 fee on my account for a $5 error?" Yes. Banks reverse fees for infrequent mistakes.
But the point is that fees wouldn't have to occur in the excessive manner in which they do IF selfish, prideful, entitled, brats got a clue and starting behaving like real adults instead of materialistic hoarders of crud.
Sorry to get ranty. Stealing makes me angry.
I have friends who sound more like yours and just don't have the same view of their debt.
Agreed. No judgement, just agreement that paying utility bills should come first. I'm sure that doesn't apply to all of the people who had their water shut off; probably many are doing their best and still need help. Some aren't, which is what OP was referring to.
"You should never judge people's financial situations based on what they own or what they look like"-I completely agree with this statement.
"If people choose to buy 'wants' instead of 'needs,' the needs shouldn't be given to them for free"-I agree with this statement completely as well.
I see these as two separate issues. This is not to negate the cycle of poverty and how tough it is to break; I would say most caught up in that are people who deserve assistance, and hopefully who the water company is working with to set up a plan to get the water back on.