Same-Sex Households
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Clicky Poll: Just a word?

My dialogue with my friend has got me thinking and I'm curious to see how this board lines up.  I know I've chatted with IRL friends about this and the opinions vary greatly. 
[Poll]
Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

Re: Clicky Poll: Just a word?

  • see, its not just the state and federal rights i'm concerned about - the word marriage matters and as long as we are using different words, there is room for discrimination (seperate will never be equal).  For example, a couple years ago CT had civil unions. supposedly they granted all the same rights as marriages but under a different word. DW's employer offered benefits to employees and married spouses.  her coworker (who had a civil union) applied for benefits for herself and her wife.  They were denied b/c they were not "married". The couple ended up having to spend $350/month for a private health insurance plan for the wife when they should have been covered.

    All of the nightmares that arose out of civil unions showed that the word matters, and I can't settle for anything less than marriage.

  • imagectbride08:

    see, its not just the state and federal rights i'm concerned about - the word marriage matters and as long as we are using different words, there is room for discrimination (seperate will never be equal).  For example, a couple years ago CT had civil unions. supposedly they granted all the same rights as marriages but under a different word. DW's employer offered benefits to employees and married spouses.  her coworker (who had a civil union) applied for benefits for herself and her wife.  They were denied b/c they were not "married". The couple ended up having to spend $350/month for a private health insurance plan for the wife when they should have been covered.

    I agree.  For the sake of my question though was hoping we could suspend reality and assume that all the rights were the same AND they got recognized. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I see - i was thinking just federal and state rights would be equal which leads me to be concerned about the ways private companies could/would discriminate.

     either way, though, as a citizen who pays equal taxes and contributes equally to our society, i want 100% equality - including the word.

  • I've come into this poll twice now without being able to choose between the first two. I'd like to say that I wouldn't settle for anything less than full equality, but really if someone said "here's your choice: option 'B' or nothing", I'd be sooooo tempted to take the rights and run!

    This is a good poll. I'll have to go think about it more and come back to vote.

    married 03/08/08 -- ttc with PCOS (dx 2005) & DS
    IUI #3 gave us the best 2nd anniv. gift ever: 2 babies! (born 03/09/10)
    Peanut and Little Man are getting so big! 2 years old already!
    image
    finally blogging again at This Will Be: An Adventure
  • Full equality... definitely FULL EQUALITY. (I guess that tells you how I voted... Big Smile )

     

    image

    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers

  • Here's what it comes down to for me:?

    I am married.

    I am not domestic partnered or civil unioned. I am not something that sounds like a legal document. I am something that sounds like a family. And anything less than that is just a BS compromise to make other people feel better at the expense of not only my rights, but my dignity.??

    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • Would your answer change if EVERYONE got civil unions?

    In Germany (I think), everyone has a civil union, it's the only thing recognized legally.  Marriage is a religious rite, and many people have marriage ceremonies in a place of worship, but in order to be recognized by the state, everyone must have a civil union.

  • imageFoodielicious:

    Would your answer change if EVERYONE got civil unions?

    In Germany (I think), everyone has a civil union, it's the only thing recognized legally.  Marriage is a religious rite, and many people have marriage ceremonies in a place of worship, but in order to be recognized by the state, everyone must have a civil union.

    i support this.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageFoodielicious:

    Would your answer change if EVERYONE got civil unions?

    yup - i fully support that model. what i dont support is the gay community having different or separate rights from the straight community.  i want total equality. if that means everyone has civil unions -  fine.  but I dont see that happening here any time soon, if ever.

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards