Green Living
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Cosmetic Safety Database users

What number are you comfortable with and why?  What do you do when a product isn't in their database at all?

I'm replacing my old products with safer options as I run out.  I use two different foundations - my every day foundation is rated a 4 and my special occasion/important meeting at work one isn't rated at all (Bobbi Brown).  I'm tempted to stick with the 4 rating but I'm not sure what to do about the other one. 

ETA:  Okay, I wonder if they recently updated ratings.  I got the 4 rating a couple weeks ago and now when I look at it, it's rated a 5.  

image
Tired after a long morning of hiking and swimming.

Re: Cosmetic Safety Database users

  • If you sign up as a user, you can submit a product. You have to enter all the ingredient information exactly as listed on the label and then it'll give you a score. I have done this, it was easy enough.

    As a general rule, I try to stick with 3 or better, but it does depend on why it's rated as such. I always scan through to see what the "problem" ingredients are.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Ditto pp.  I look for which ingredients are labeled as the higher numbers and why- I stay away from the "reproductive issues" and "may cause cancer" products.
    BFP #1: 3/20/10, EDD 11/22/12, DD born: 11/20/12
    BFP #2: 8/26/12, EDD 5/3/12, M/C 9/4/12
    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
    Living Simple Blog
  • i also recommend looking at the specific ingredients. they rate fragrance very high, so an EF product that has fragrance may be rated worse than a conventional product that does not. i would say 3 or better is a safe bet.
    June 13, 2009 ~ Ocho Rios, Jamaica
  • I also try to stick with 3 or better.  From researching products, I've found that if it's made by any of the big brands (Cover Girl, Maybelline etc..) 9 times out of 10 it's way above a 3 so I usually don't even bother.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I don't go by #, I go by ingredients and factor in the data gap. For example, (from a blog entry)

    My summer standby for daily facial wear Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch Sunblock, SPF 55 receives a Hazard Score of 7, which is not good (lower is better), but there is a data gap of 82%, so not much is known about all the products ingredients. It could be worse or more harmless that they currently think. But, going on what we DO know, if I take a look at the ingredients list I can see the main culprits in this sunscreen are methylparaben, fragrance, and oxybenzone. Methylparaben: I try to avoid parabens, but I am willing to compromise for this products. Fragrance: I am not a fan of artificial fragrance, but plenty of people would not care or see this as a big drawback, this is why you must judge for yourself and not just go by product score. Oxybenzone: No clue what this is so I click on the hyperlink to learn that they can cause photoallergenic effects, something, again, I have never heard of. So, I do some searching and learn that if I had lupus (as my mom does) I would want to avoid this product. Since I don't I am okay with the ingredient until I notice adverse effects. I am now educated on this product and decide I can live with the 7 rating in this particular product, even though most of my products are rated 0-2.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagepixieprincss:

    I don't go by #, I go by ingredients and factor in the data gap. For example, (from a blog entry)

    My summer standby for daily facial wear Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch Sunblock, SPF 55 receives a Hazard Score of 7, which is not good (lower is better), but there is a data gap of 82%, so not much is known about all the products ingredients. It could be worse or more harmless that they currently think. But, going on what we DO know, if I take a look at the ingredients list I can see the main culprits in this sunscreen are methylparaben, fragrance, and oxybenzone. Methylparaben: I try to avoid parabens, but I am willing to compromise for this products. Fragrance: I am not a fan of artificial fragrance, but plenty of people would not care or see this as a big drawback, this is why you must judge for yourself and not just go by product score. Oxybenzone: No clue what this is so I click on the hyperlink to learn that they can cause photoallergenic effects, something, again, I have never heard of. So, I do some searching and learn that if I had lupus (as my mom does) I would want to avoid this product. Since I don't I am okay with the ingredient until I notice adverse effects. I am now educated on this product and decide I can live with the 7 rating in this particular product, even though most of my products are rated 0-2.

    Thank you.  This method makes a lot of sense to me.

    image
    Tired after a long morning of hiking and swimming.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards