North Carolina Nesties
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Discuss: Airport censorship?

Last week, during our layover on the trip home from my conference we were sitting in the airport watching CNN Headline news.  One of the stories was an investigational story with the lead-in "is your flight toxic?"  CNN went to commercial and then once the anchor came back on to introduced the story, the channel was changed.  Not by any of us--the airport (or airline or terminal--whoever) changed the channel (I'll be honest, I wasn't sure airports GOT any other channel other than HLN).  Once the story was over, it went back to CNN Headline news. 

Anyway, I found that action very, very "interesting."  Maybe it's because I don't consider myself an over-reactor--I wouldn't listen to that report and then demand to see the air filters on the plane, I'd try to objectively see it from all sides, think about it, research it some more, and then draw my own conclusions.  I'm sure there are others that wouldn't react nearly as logically.  Buuuttt....it does beg the question, if there wasn't some truth to the story, then why would the airport/airline bother to change the channel??

Would they change the channel to keep passengers "in the dark" about a plane crash too?  (I put it in "" because I doubt they would suspend wifi and cell phones from passing along the news.)

WDYT??  I do think they are certainly within their legal rights to do what they did.  They don't have to provide ANY televisions at all--I understand they are a courtesy to help pass time.  It just sort of makes me raise my eyebrows and wonder....

Re: Discuss: Airport censorship?

  • Why I do find it odd that they changed the channel, maybe they did so because of the amount of people that may overreact. The world is definitely full of crazies. People may have been filled with questions and flights could have been possibly interrupted if they were having to hold a plane for the crazies demanding answers. Who knows! Definitely odd though.
  • That's interesting that they'd keep so close an eye on what's actually on the show, I figured they just let it go. I dunno, as far as the airline industry I kinda feel like they "do what they gotta do" and don't really question too much b/c I figure I rarely have more than a fraction of the knowledge that they do on any given event.
  • I can see how it would be easier for them to change the channel. However since you already heard the info about the upcoming piece it would not be hard to look up the info later.
    imageimage
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Legal right to do what they did aside (you're right, perfectly legal)...if I was the owner of a business that happened to have televisions around for customers to watch, I'd probably consider changing the channel too if something negative or condescending related to my line of business were featured.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards