April 2008 Weddings
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

WHY I AM AGAINST HCR - LONG LONG LONG

OK let me begin by saying that i am libertarian and i am ALL FOR SMALLER GOVERNMENT. I voted against Obama for this reason, but i think McCain would have been all big government too so i think whoever is the President is a moot point. However, had McCain been President, this bill would not have passed simply because of a Democratic Senate and House and a Republican Pres. For those of you old enough to remember, Clinton tried to pass a healthcare bill back in the day, but he had a Republican Senate and House and it lost somewhere in 1 of the 2.

I follow alot of politics and I try to understand all aspects of an issue. I also rarely watch ANY television news because they are ALWAYS slanted right or left and rarely give the important details on an issue. I try to do my research on something and i apologize in advance if something i wrote is not exactly correct.?

I will also admit to being stubborn, so if i believe something (and i feel as though i educate myself to the facts before i form an opinion) i rarely change my position, so dont think that you will be able to change my stance on an issue.

I really summarized just a few of the reasons why i think this bill is bad. i could go on for days and can really go into detail on all of the ones i listed, but i just dont have the energy right now and you guys wont want to read it.

I dont want anyone to think that i am gun ho with the way things are - I DEFINITELY AM NOT!!!! but there are WAY better, more cost effective ways for healthcare reform. I do know that we need insurance reform and i do agree that everyone should have the opportunity to get affordable insurance.?I AM SIMPLY AGAINST THIS BILL!

1. The bill is unconstitutional. In the entire history of this nation, no one was ever required to purchase anything PERIOD. This bill has provisions where every single American citizen has to purchase health insurance or be fined.

2. The bill has a provision where as the government has access to your bank accounts. Why would they want access to your bank account other than to see if you have 'too much' money, then they can tax you so they can take it.

3. Illegal immigrants are claused into the bill at NO EXPENSE to them, only to the legal tax-paying citizens.

4. The bill is a job killer. I already have heard of people being laid off from their jobs (construction) because the small company they worked for cant afford the taxes that are RIDICULOUS for a small business owner to afford.

5. This is going to KILL the insurance companies, which is a plan of this government. The point of being insured at anything is to be prepared in the case of an unforeseen circumstance. If everyone has to be insured, then what is the point of an insurance company?

6. After this plan is in full effect, the government will have control of banks, medical industry, automobile industry, and STUDENT LOANS. Student loans you wonder? Yes, student loans. A provision to control the way student loans are issued was piggybacked into this bill, so now the government is also involved in higher education.

7. I DO NOT WANT TO PAY FOR SOMEONE TO ABORT A BABY! I am pro-life and I don't even want to argue about this at all. Killing babies is just wrong. The executive order is worthless over a federal law. My tax money will be paying for someone to have an abortion.

8. I think the way this bill was ushered in is conniving, sneaky, malicious, and WRONG. I think the people that are supposed to be representing us are NOT. I know this goes on for probably every bill, but this one is going to cost us at least a TRILLION dollars and the entire notion of 'hey i will throw all this cool free stuff for your state if you vote yes' is just WRONG. I could spit on Mary Landrieu because she justs disgusts me but especially because she took a bribe for a yes vote.?

9. Who's going to go to school for 10 years and study medicine if there is no incentive as to why? What will be the quality of the doctors practicing medicine with all these new regulations and pay caps and whatever?

10. Socialized medicine may look great on paper, but when I have a medical issue, I am able to receive immediate medical attention, REGARDLESS if i am insured or NOT. I do not want to wait months to see a doctor because he has met his quota. Basically, I DO NOT WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO DICTATE TO ME WHO or WHEN i can see my doctor.

11. I do not think the government has the right to tell someone that the only treatment they can receive is end of life counseling. Yes, it is in the bill that when the government deems the patient to be 'too expensive' that they will instead receive end of life counseling. God forbid if Gerrie or my aunt's cancer returns, would that mean they cannot receive anymore care? I think they and countless others deserve all of the care necessary to win their fight.

12. The government has run so many successful programs. Yes i am being sarcastic. Here are a few: the postal service (which is going through many layoffs and shutting down offices), Medicare and Medicaid (which doctors are refusing to accept because the government keeps shortchanging them), Social Security (which is bankrupt), the stimulus plan (which i havent heard of 1 single person getting stimulated by this plan), and the Cash for Clunkers (which from what i hear has been a MESS - it costs more to dispose the clunkers than the rebate was or something like that). HOW SHOULD I TRUST THE GOVERNMENT TO SUCCESSFULLY RUN SOMETHING AS IMPORTANT TO ME AS MY HEALTHCARE?

13. How are they going to pay for this? All i keep hearing is the program will pay for itself and before long, will be making a profit. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? is the FED going to print up some more monopoly money? Likely, but as the value of our dollar decreases because of all this monopoly money being printed, inflation is going to continue to sky rocket, unemployment will continue to go up, and this mess will just get harder and harder to dig out of.

14. IT IS UNAMERICAN. it goes against everything this country was built on. for a while now, this country has revolved from being a place where one was able to work hard to achieve. now, too many hold their hands out to receive. it is NOT FAIR for those of us that work really hard to be successful get punished by rewarding those who wont do for themselves with free houses, free cars, free food, free healthcare.

Example - Hurricane Katrina was an awful thing. ALOT of people lost everything. Some of these people had never once worked a minute in their lives and cried and cried for the government to GIVE GIVE GIVE. 3 weeks later, Hurricane Rita was another awful thing. ALOT of people also lost everything. Did you ever once hear these people complain? I didnt and i live in the heart of all this. They just went out there and started rebuilding. I am in no way saying that people in NOLA didnt do this, but the ones that never worked a day EVER in their lives just cried to the government to do everything while those that have always done for themselves just did. this is what our country is right now and that is NOT a good thing. We need those that are able to get off the government teet to do so and start fending for themselves. otherwise, why should those that do work hard continue to do so? i believe that if this fundamental issue is addressed then alot of problems with this country can be remedied. i will save that post for another day lol.

?

«1

Re: WHY I AM AGAINST HCR - LONG LONG LONG

  • Yes

    I think I love you....

    image
    Leopard in Acacia Tree, Serengeti National Park, Tanzania 2009
    Crafty Owl Blog
    Follow Me on Pinterest
  • thank you for giving us your opiniion.  :) 

    and i would like to throw in there that i am all for healthcare reform, but i also agree that this bill is VERY lacking. 

    and i'm a democrat.  Smile

  • I agree with Tiffany.  I think this bill is not the way to go but possibly a step in the right direction to get something going, but not sure. (i swing both realist and idealist...I'm a realistic idealist)...

    I think everyone should have access to affordable healthcare.  I can tell you first hand about small biz taxes.  They take 40-60%.  That's killing me, I hate it.

    Visit The Nest! BabyFruit Ticker married 4/19/2008
  • I read today that people who have served as senators, representatives, presidents etc don't have to use this plan or participate. Is that true? I think everyone should be able to afford insurance but it shouldn't be forced on you. We didn't have insurance growing up because my dad was self employed & we couldn't afford it.
  • imageBeckF4:
    I read today that people who have served as senators, representatives, presidents etc don't have to use this plan or participate. Is that true? I think everyone should be able to afford insurance but it shouldn't be forced on you. We didn't have insurance growing up because my dad was self employed & we couldn't afford it.
    yes that is true. so in essence, our 'representatives' that really didnt listen to us and insisted this is the best plan possible, exempted themselves from the plan that they voted in. :-/
  • Do you have text supporting these points? 

    I ask because I've read numerous sections of the actual bill and, taking your bank account point for example, that is not at all what I read.  I went back to look it up (section 163 if anyone else cares to reference it) and it's basically an ETF - same thing any company that you have auto bill or anytime you swipe your credit card - would have access to "verify funds at point of sale."  It also explicitly states that this information is to be used at time of payment and cannot be shared with any other entity.

    Nothing in
    9 this section shall be construed to permit the use of infor10
    mation collected under this section in a manner that would
    11 adversely affect any individual.
    12 ??(c) PROTECTION OF DATA.?The Secretary shall en13
    sure (through the promulgation of regulations or other14
    wise) that all data collected pursuant to subsection (a)
    15 are?
    16 ??(1) used and disclosed in a manner that meets
    17 the HIPAA privacy and security law (as defined in
    18 section 3009(a)(2) of the Public Health Service
    19 Act), including any privacy or security standard
    20 adopted under section 3004 of such Act; and
    21 ??(2) protected from all inappropriate internal
    22 use by any entity that collects, stores, or receives the
    23 data, including use of such data in determinations of
    24 eligibility (or continued eligibility) in health plans,
    1 and from other inappropriate uses, as defined by the
    2 Secretary.??.

    I respect your options.  However, quite honestly, I think most of your 'facts' are exaggerated at best and false at worst.  Still, I want to thank you sharing.  It's made me dig even deeper into the bill to see how it actually reads.  It's been informative.  And, again, if you have actual text to back up your points, by all means, please share.  There may be other sections that I have yet to read.

    image
    margaritas in mexico
  • and beck, i should have added this: i am a school teacher, my husband is a self empoyed artist. he is on my insurance. i had a regular job in the oilfield, got very sick, was laid off and lost my insurance because i could not afford the cobra plan. i still received fantastic medical care although i no longer had insurance. i was never denied any care while not having insurance and i honestly believe that is a myth that people do not receive care when they are sick. i have been asking everyone and let me ask all of you: do you know any 1 person turned away from receiving medical care ever? i cant find 1.
  • imagekrittykrat:
    imageBeckF4:
    I read today that people who have served as senators, representatives, presidents etc don't have to use this plan or participate. Is that true? I think everyone should be able to afford insurance but it shouldn't be forced on you. We didn't have insurance growing up because my dad was self employed & we couldn't afford it.
    yes that is true. so in essence, our 'representatives' that really didnt listen to us and insisted this is the best plan possible, exempted themselves from the plan that they voted in. :-/

    This argument makes no sense.  No one is being forced to take any plan.  It simply opens up the options for those that are without or for those that want to switch for one reason or another.  If you have health care through your employer (which senators do), why would you take up something else?  So, if you and I don't have to give up our employer-subsidized plan why should they? 

    image
    margaritas in mexico
  • imagekrittykrat:
    and beck, i should have added this: i am a school teacher, my husband is a self empoyed artist. he is on my insurance. i had a regular job in the oilfield, got very sick, was laid off and lost my insurance because i could not afford the cobra plan. i still received fantastic medical care although i no longer had insurance. i was never denied any care while not having insurance and i honestly believe that is a myth that people do not receive care when they are sick. i have been asking everyone and let me ask all of you: do you know any 1 person turned away from receiving medical care ever? i cant find 1.

    People legally cannot be turned away from an emergency room.  However, many of those people don't pay.  And guess who foots the bill?  Tax payers.

    Did you pay for 100% of your services while you were without insurance?  If so, thank you.

    image
    margaritas in mexico
  • I also want to add that I don't think this bill is perfect. 
    image
    margaritas in mexico
  • imageaprilbridezilla19:

    I agree with Tiffany.  I think this bill is not the way to go but possibly a step in the right direction to get something going, but not sure. (i swing both realist and idealist...I'm a realistic idealist)...

    I think everyone should have access to affordable healthcare.  I can tell you first hand about small biz taxes.  They take 40-60%.  That's killing me, I hate it.

    Do you file as a Schedule C, Partnership or S-Corp?

     

    image
    margaritas in mexico
  • imageandrea42608:

    imagekrittykrat:
    imageBeckF4:
    I read today that people who have served as senators, representatives, presidents etc don't have to use this plan or participate. Is that true? I think everyone should be able to afford insurance but it shouldn't be forced on you. We didn't have insurance growing up because my dad was self employed & we couldn't afford it.
    yes that is true. so in essence, our 'representatives' that really didnt listen to us and insisted this is the best plan possible, exempted themselves from the plan that they voted in. :-/

    This argument makes no sense.  No one is being forced to take any plan.  It simply opens up the options for those that are without or for those that want to switch for one reason or another.  If you have health care through your employer (which senators do), why would you take up something else?  So, if you and I don't have to give up our employer-subsidized plan why should they? 

    Yes, Andrea you are right. Why would we give up our H&W and they wouldn't either. I guess I was thinking if they were unemployed. Not sure that will ever happen.
  • imageBeckF4:
    imageandrea42608:

    imagekrittykrat:
    imageBeckF4:
    I read today that people who have served as senators, representatives, presidents etc don't have to use this plan or participate. Is that true? I think everyone should be able to afford insurance but it shouldn't be forced on you. We didn't have insurance growing up because my dad was self employed & we couldn't afford it.
    yes that is true. so in essence, our 'representatives' that really didnt listen to us and insisted this is the best plan possible, exempted themselves from the plan that they voted in. :-/

    This argument makes no sense.  No one is being forced to take any plan.  It simply opens up the options for those that are without or for those that want to switch for one reason or another.  If you have health care through your employer (which senators do), why would you take up something else?  So, if you and I don't have to give up our employer-subsidized plan why should they? 

    Yes, Andrea you are right. Why would we give up our H&W and they wouldn't either. I guess I was thinking if they were unemployed. Not sure that will ever happen.

    Losing an election would probably do that! haha.

     

    image
    margaritas in mexico
  • imageandrea42608:

    imagekrittykrat:
    imageBeckF4:
    I read today that people who have served as senators, representatives, presidents etc don't have to use this plan or participate. Is that true? I think everyone should be able to afford insurance but it shouldn't be forced on you. We didn't have insurance growing up because my dad was self employed & we couldn't afford it.
    yes that is true. so in essence, our 'representatives' that really didnt listen to us and insisted this is the best plan possible, exempted themselves from the plan that they voted in. :-/

    This argument makes no sense.? No one is being forced to take any plan.? It simply opens up the options for those that are without or for those that want to switch for one reason or another.? If you have health care through your employer (which senators do), why would you take up something else?? So, if you and I don't have to give up our employer-subsidized plan why should they??

    if the government is taxing (or charging extra fees, which is another way to say tax imho) the hell out of a business because that business opted for a private insurance plan, eventually the business is going to be forced to either a)pay the additional taxes which will go to the comsumer or force layoffs or b)the company will drop the private insurance
  • imageandrea42608:

    Do you have text supporting these points??

    I ask because I've read numerous sections of the actual bill and, taking your bank account point for example, that is not at all what I read.? I went back to look it up (section 163 if anyone else cares to reference it) and it's basically an ETF - same thing any company that you have auto bill or anytime you swipe your credit card - would have access to "verify funds at point of sale."? It also explicitly states that this information is to be used at time of payment and cannot be shared with any other entity.

    Nothing in
    9 this section shall be construed to permit the use of infor10
    mation collected under this section in a manner that would
    11 adversely affect any individual.
    12 ??(c) PROTECTION OF DATA.?The Secretary shall en13
    sure (through the promulgation of regulations or other14
    wise) that all data collected pursuant to subsection (a)
    15 are?
    16 ??(1) used and disclosed in a manner that meets
    17 the HIPAA privacy and security law (as defined in
    18 section 3009(a)(2) of the Public Health Service
    19 Act), including any privacy or security standard
    20 adopted under section 3004 of such Act; and
    21 ??(2) protected from all inappropriate internal
    22 use by any entity that collects, stores, or receives the
    23 data, including use of such data in determinations of
    24 eligibility (or continued eligibility) in health plans,
    1 and from other inappropriate uses, as defined by the
    2 Secretary.??.

    I respect your options.? However, quite honestly, I think most of your 'facts' are exaggerated at best and false at worst.? Still, I want to thank you sharing.? It's made me dig even deeper into the bill to see how it actually reads.? It's been informative.? And, again, if you have actual text to back up your points, by all means, please share.? There may be other sections that I have yet to read.

    it's in there. looking for it now. will post when i find it
  • imageandrea42608:
    imageaprilbridezilla19:

    I agree with Tiffany.  I think this bill is not the way to go but possibly a step in the right direction to get something going, but not sure. (i swing both realist and idealist...I'm a realistic idealist)...

    I think everyone should have access to affordable healthcare.  I can tell you first hand about small biz taxes.  They take 40-60%.  That's killing me, I hate it.

    Do you file as a Schedule C, Partnership or S-Corp?

     

    currently I file as a sole proprietor so that I don't have to pay into unemployment.  I have 3 years to not make any profit before they deem my past 3 years as just a hobby I was writing off...depending on my expenses vs. income this year I may file as an s-corp, it just depends.  I will also have to eventually pay quarterly a projected income tax amount as well as sales tax amounts separately.  Oh the joys.

    Visit The Nest! BabyFruit Ticker married 4/19/2008
  • imageandrea42608:
    imageBeckF4:
    imageandrea42608:

    imagekrittykrat:
    imageBeckF4:
    I read today that people who have served as senators, representatives, presidents etc don't have to use this plan or participate. Is that true? I think everyone should be able to afford insurance but it shouldn't be forced on you. We didn't have insurance growing up because my dad was self employed & we couldn't afford it.
    yes that is true. so in essence, our 'representatives' that really didnt listen to us and insisted this is the best plan possible, exempted themselves from the plan that they voted in. :-/

    This argument makes no sense.  No one is being forced to take any plan.  It simply opens up the options for those that are without or for those that want to switch for one reason or another.  If you have health care through your employer (which senators do), why would you take up something else?  So, if you and I don't have to give up our employer-subsidized plan why should they? 

    Yes, Andrea you are right. Why would we give up our H&W and they wouldn't either. I guess I was thinking if they were unemployed. Not sure that will ever happen.

    Losing an election would probably do that! haha.

     

    Yes, but they will go home & find another job rather quickly at least most of them. Lol
  • KrittyKrat, I think I love you...and if we weren't already married, I'd marry you.

    If you run for office, I'd vote for you.

    xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagekrittykrat:
    imageandrea42608:

    imagekrittykrat:
    imageBeckF4:
    I read today that people who have served as senators, representatives, presidents etc don't have to use this plan or participate. Is that true? I think everyone should be able to afford insurance but it shouldn't be forced on you. We didn't have insurance growing up because my dad was self employed & we couldn't afford it.
    yes that is true. so in essence, our 'representatives' that really didnt listen to us and insisted this is the best plan possible, exempted themselves from the plan that they voted in. :-/

    This argument makes no sense.  No one is being forced to take any plan.  It simply opens up the options for those that are without or for those that want to switch for one reason or another.  If you have health care through your employer (which senators do), why would you take up something else?  So, if you and I don't have to give up our employer-subsidized plan why should they? 

    if the government is taxing (or charging extra fees, which is another way to say tax imho) the hell out of a business because that business opted for a private insurance plan, eventually the business is going to be forced to either a)pay the additional taxes which will go to the comsumer or force layoffs or b)the company will drop the private insurance

    But that's not exactly what is happening.  Beginning in 2014 (or is it 2018?) then a tax will be imposed on high-premium plans (and the tax will only be on the amount over the set limit, not the entire plan).  Anything that falls below that threshold will not be subject to the 'Cadillac tax' as it has been dubbed. So, yes, eventually it could have an affect on certain plans, but far from all. 

    image
    margaritas in mexico
  • I am very much with you, and yay for another Libertarian!  When I tell people that's what I am they always confuse it with being a Liberal which is why most people get confused when I say I am against about 80% of what Obama has done since going into office. 

    What I just LOVE is that part of the bribery to get some of those last Dems on board was to take out the Abortion aspect of the health care bill, but then later they admitted that while it was removed from the bill that the House passed, the Senate version had it in it, and that's ultimately the version that the President signed.  

  • imageandrea42608:

    imagekrittykrat:
    and beck, i should have added this: i am a school teacher, my husband is a self empoyed artist. he is on my insurance. i had a regular job in the oilfield, got very sick, was laid off and lost my insurance because i could not afford the cobra plan. i still received fantastic medical care although i no longer had insurance. i was never denied any care while not having insurance and i honestly believe that is a myth that people do not receive care when they are sick. i have been asking everyone and let me ask all of you: do you know any 1 person turned away from receiving medical care ever? i cant find 1.

    People legally cannot be turned away from an emergency room.? However, many of those people don't pay.? And guess who foots the bill?? Tax payers.

    Did you pay for 100% of your services while you were without insurance?? If so, thank you.

    yes i paid for ALL of my medical bills. and i am a tax paying citizen. unemployment doesnt mean you dont pay taxes, so while i was unemployed, i guess i was paying for someone else's medicine and food and shelter too! guess who is going to be footing the bill for this new health care bill? you guessed it! WE ALL WILL! well, except if you dont work, or if you are an illegal alien, then i guess you are ok! which means i will still be paying for those who can do for themselves but choose not to.
  • imageaprilbridezilla19:
    imageandrea42608:
    imageaprilbridezilla19:

    I agree with Tiffany.  I think this bill is not the way to go but possibly a step in the right direction to get something going, but not sure. (i swing both realist and idealist...I'm a realistic idealist)...

    I think everyone should have access to affordable healthcare.  I can tell you first hand about small biz taxes.  They take 40-60%.  That's killing me, I hate it.

    Do you file as a Schedule C, Partnership or S-Corp?

     

    currently I file as a sole proprietor so that I don't have to pay into unemployment.  I have 3 years to not make any profit before they deem my past 3 years as just a hobby I was writing off...depending on my expenses vs. income this year I may file as an s-corp, it just depends.  I will also have to eventually pay quarterly a projected income tax amount as well as sales tax amounts separately.  Oh the joys.

    It's fun stuff! :p  While S-Corps and Partnerships require much more work (i.e. filing a completely separate return), you can avoid some of the dreaded self-employment tax.  I hate that extra 15%.

    image
    margaritas in mexico
  • I really should add, for the purpose of disclosure, that I am non-tax payer.  At least this past year.  You don't pay taxes on disability. 
  • imagekrittykrat:
    imageandrea42608:

    imagekrittykrat:
    and beck, i should have added this: i am a school teacher, my husband is a self empoyed artist. he is on my insurance. i had a regular job in the oilfield, got very sick, was laid off and lost my insurance because i could not afford the cobra plan. i still received fantastic medical care although i no longer had insurance. i was never denied any care while not having insurance and i honestly believe that is a myth that people do not receive care when they are sick. i have been asking everyone and let me ask all of you: do you know any 1 person turned away from receiving medical care ever? i cant find 1.

    People legally cannot be turned away from an emergency room.  However, many of those people don't pay.  And guess who foots the bill?  Tax payers.

    Did you pay for 100% of your services while you were without insurance?  If so, thank you.

    yes i paid for ALL of my medical bills. and i am a tax paying citizen. unemployment doesnt mean you dont pay taxes, so while i was unemployed, i guess i was paying for someone else's medicine and food and shelter too! guess who is going to be footing the bill for this new health care bill? you guessed it! WE ALL WILL! well, except if you dont work, or if you are an illegal alien, then i guess you are ok! which means i will still be paying for those who can do for themselves but choose not to.

    Oh, I'm not questioning that this will cost money.  It will.  But we are already paying for all of the uninsured that utilize (and don't pay for) their emergency room visits (due to lack of insurance and access to preventive care).

    I pay taxes for a bunch of stuff I don't use.  Schools?  Don't have kids.  Might eventually, but for now, I'm not using it, but my tax money still funds it.  However, I do indirectly benefit from an educated public. Same goes for health insurance.

    image
    margaritas in mexico
  • imagejebuell:
    I really should add, for the purpose of disclosure, that I am non-tax payer.  At least this past year.  You don't pay taxes on disability. 

    Interesting.  Is it SSDI?  If so, I guess that makes sense.  Never thought about it though!

    image
    margaritas in mexico
  • Interesting thread ladies! I really would like to know more about the healthcare bill, but with the baby it's just hard to read much!

    I just need to say one thing about this whole debate. Why is it that everyone gets so hung up on abortion as a medical procedure? That is such a miniscule part of healthcare as a whole, it seems a little ridiculous to center the entire argument on it. What about every other appointment, procedure, surgery, etc. that occurs?

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageAndie41:

    Interesting thread ladies! I really would like to know more about the healthcare bill, but with the baby it's just hard to read much!

    I just need to say one thing about this whole debate. Why is it that everyone gets so hung up on abortion as a medical procedure? That is such a miniscule part of healthcare as a whole, it seems a little ridiculous to center the entire argument on it. What about every other appointment, procedure, surgery, etc. that occurs?

    DH and I had the exact same discussion a few nights ago!!!

  • imageAndie41:

    Interesting thread ladies! I really would like to know more about the healthcare bill, but with the baby it's just hard to read much!

    I just need to say one thing about this whole debate. Why is it that everyone gets so hung up on abortion as a medical procedure? That is such a miniscule part of healthcare as a whole, it seems a little ridiculous to center the entire argument on it. What about every other appointment, procedure, surgery, etc. that occurs?

    every debate has the 'deal' (and i know its called something better but heck if i know what that is lol). in this case, its abortion. the republicans know that will put people up in arms so they talk about it, the democrats know that a compromise will appease those up in arms, so thats the bargaining chip. its dumb and there is always something that is in a bill like that so that it gives us the appearance that they are doing something up there in washington. its all part of the farce. but the problem is that the people are very concerned about this bill and so after it was signed, the truth came out about the executive order and that really pissed those people off even more so it backfired.
  • I have to say that from what I've read and heard so far, I'm for this reform.  I definitely don't think it's perfect, but it's a step.  I still have to do more reading on it, and then I can make more logical arguments.  So until that happens, I don't want to add anything untrue. 

    But I will say that the president of one of our major hospitals was saying the other day that medical costs are so inflated these days because the hospitals and such are passing the costs on to people who actually pay their bills from the people that use the health services that don't pay the bills.  This could explain why I was shocked to see the astronomically large bill DH got from his hospital stay last year.  The costs are just ridiculous.  So I already consider myself paying for a lot of these uninsured people anyway. 

    Pregnancy Ticker
  • imagekrittykrat:

    1. The bill is unconstitutional. In the entire history of this nation, no one was ever required to purchase anything PERIOD. This bill has provisions where every single American citizen has to purchase health insurance or be fined.

    There's nothing in the constitution about this. This is an absolute untruth about this bill.  The government requires you to purchase a lot of things like car insurance for one, are you saying that's unconstitutional as well?  It's not. 
    Visit The Nest! BabyFruit Ticker married 4/19/2008
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards