Phoenix Nesties
Dear Community,
Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.
If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.
Thank you.
Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.
just to get you thinking...
Would you have a baby just to help save the life of a baby/kid you already had??
Re: just to get you thinking...
Can't wait to meet my baby boy!
I don't know....that is a REALLY hard question to think about unless you were in the situation.
I'm sorry...I can't make a decision right now.
I absolutely would... so long as the 2nd baby would be OK in the end too! I would not bring another child into this world only to lose it to save the first though.
The way I see it is that Children are a blessing and you would be able to find a way to make it work. I would also hold onto hope that the children would be very close in the future knowing later what they went through to have each other...
That's alright, I'm really kinda stuck on that one too. I prob. would if I were in the situation & had a really good idea that I & the unborn baby would both be healthy & live to tell the story.
At this point in time - no I would not.
I have a very morbid sense of reality...which could change once I have my own children. But my current belief structure is completely against this idea.
Click Me
i don't get the question....would the new baby not live to save the other baby's life, or would it be fine?
Oh goodness- see even this question goes further in would you genetically engineer a child to be an exact match for your child.
I have huge issues with genetic engineering. I also believe that an individual has the right to decide what to do with their body- and subjecting a child through all the rigorous tests and proceedures- I just I dont know.
I had huge issues when I read My Sister's Keeper. That being said- as a sibling, I'd have sacraficed even my own life for my sister- and would hate my parents if I could have saved her, and didnt because I wasn't old enough to understand the situation.
My jurry's out on this one.
Well you could answer it either way. Like that's the only way that I'd be able to do it. If all assumptions were that the unborn baby & I would be fine after it was all said & done. And def. no genetic engineering either. I don't believe that's right.
I guess I don't get it either. Are you saying that the second child wouldn't live? If that's the case, I'd say definitely not.
But if you're saying that you're just planning on using cord blood or stem cells or whatever to help the first child, etc., yes I think I would. Especially if MH and I were already planning on having more kids.
This is a hard question, I have been thinking about it all day...
That being said I don't know that I could have another child with the sole reason of saving the first one. But if we were planning to having more children and then they happen to be a match then yes but only if the second/third one would survive. I have not read and or seen the movie but i think this is a hard choice to make.
m/c 12/25/09 (5w5d) mm/c D&C 4/9/10 (11w1d) Take home baby 2/22/11
My boobies belong to cour10e