Oregon Nesties
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

What do you think of the proposed bike laws?

HB 2228 prohibits cyclists from carrying children 6 years or younger on a bicycle or in a bike trailer.

 HB 2602 prohibits cyclists from using headphones and bluetooth devices.

 My thoughts:  2228 is stupid.  Require them to use proper safety gear - helmet, straps - but then let it go.  So many Portlanders use cycling as their main form of transportation; you'd be telling families with children under 6 that they must own a car or use TriMet.  Why should I have to do that when cycling is free?  H and I were planning on buying a trailer this year so we could take our 3 year old nephews places with us.  They will definitely be wearing a helmet and we will get a highly rated trailer.  Now we'll wait.  There's no point in getting one if the boys can't go places with us.

 2602 - I'm ok with the no headphones part of it.  Motorists shouldn't wear headphones either.  But to make it ok for a motorist to use a bluetooth and not for a cyclist makes me all kinds of ragey.

Re: What do you think of the proposed bike laws?

  • I too think HB 2228 is stupid for the same reasons

    I can agree with HB 2602.  I also think motorists should not be allowed to use bluetooth, but I think cyclists have to be even more aware and not distracted because there are a lot of idiot motorists out there...even the ones not using bluetooths.  When I ride, I am hyper vigilant of motorists. I tend to not trust anyone.

    image
  • 2228 is ridiculous. I hope this doesn't pass.

    2602- I can see where it's dangerous to use headphones/bluetooths while cycling but why are motorists allowed?  I did see a cyclist texting once- that was scary.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • My husband actually sent an email to the idiot proposing 2228 and got a respose saying he wanted to start a conversation about bike saftey in general so this will aspctually not be something that goes in.
    BabyName Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker image
  • I think 2228 is a solution in search of a problem and I'm side-eyeing Greenlick for proposing it; I find it hard to believe that he can't find more pressing issues to occupy his time and title.

    I think banning headphones make sense, but the bluetooth part is dumb.

    In case you're wondering where everyone went: http://pandce.proboards.com/index.cgi
  • 2228 is BS. That would never fly. I agree with no headphones but don't see how they could make no bluetooth pass when motorists can use bluetooth. 
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards