Green Living
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

GMOs: Devaluing the definition of ?Organic?

http://redgreenandblue.org/2011/03/02/gmos-devaluing-the-definition-of-organic/ 

To follow up from Majorwife's GMO post below, here is another article from the same website.  I have exerpted the portion that I think is the most alarming about GMOs.

GMOs: Devaluing the definition of ?Organic?

You?ll never guess what comes next?

Here?s the Monsanto sequence:

  1. ?Let us plant GMOs. There?s no danger of contamination. You won?t have to lower your standards.?
  2. ?Oh, there?s contamination? But it?s no big deal.?
  3. ?There?s so much contamination that there?s no point in trying to abide by the old standards.?
  4. And coming soon? ?Hey, there?s already GMOs in your food. Why not just throw in the towel and say GMO food can BE organic??

But really, from a business standpoint, is it fair to decertify an otherwise pure field (and make the farmer lose the $ premium that comes with the organic label) just because it?s been contaminated with a pesky tenth of a percent of GMO genes? Or one perecent? Or two?

I suppose it shouldn?t be surprising in a country where milk comes adulterated with pus (tolerated because Monsanto?s artificial growth hormones make the cows so sick there?s no way to avoid it), and where they gather up the pink slime off the slaughterhouse floor so they can add it back in to MacDonald?s hamburgers and pad their profit margins even further.

Coming soon:

  • -Vegetarian meals that are 2% chicken (?Tastes just like tofurky!?)image
  • -Kosher meals that are 2% pork (?Oy vey!?)
  • -A wonderful new soy-based product that will be cheap and plentiful and feed the hungry masses of the Earth (?Soylent Green is probably not much more than 2% people!?)
Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

Re: GMOs: Devaluing the definition of ?Organic?

  • We are on the cusp of Step 4 people.  ?Hey, there?s already GMOs in your food. Why not just throw in the towel and say GMO food can BE organic?? Then there will be no escaping the birth defects and environmental degradation.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I'm going to barf.  Ick!
  • So awful.  There are no words...
  • This is why I support the non-gmo project.  Yes, the definition of Organic means that the food can't contain GMO's but with drift, if they're not testing, we could be eating it.  The Non-GMO product actually tests products for GMO's and certifies products based on the results: http://www.nongmoproject.org/
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards