I just can't resist the following comments:
1) Is this what "get in their faces" means? Obama said that his supporters were supposed to get feisty and get in opponents' faces.
2) I thought that the Obama supporters were the loving, caring proponents of hope and change, lovingly holding hands and gazing at rainbows, puppydogs at their feet. Why the McCain supporter's household being shot up, the carving of "B" for Obama in a twenty-year-old's face?
Are we going to see a full-fledged media spin about those mean, nasty Obama supporters and how they are a scary mob inciting hate, violence, and rage?
As my dad says, "wish in one hand, spit in the other, and see which fills up faster."
Re: McCain supporter mutilated
Maybe it was real, maybe it was fake, but you will see a definite difference in the way this is treated vs. the false "kill him" comment.
Hypocrisy---saying "it didn't happen" or "she wasn't mutilated because she refused medical treatment."
Would that they would have exhibited the same healthy skepticism about "kill him," but they believe it even after the Secret Service debunked it, kinda like the rape kit and book bannings.
But no--they wanted to perpetuate the "mean, nasty McCain mob of rotten people" narrative. This conflicts with the "kind, above it all Obama supporter" narrative.
Note: I can't believe McCain is still having to defend the plural "terrorists" comment, like he did on NBC tonight. Ayers and Dohrn are two people, thus plural.