North Florida Nesties
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Lame-O question spurred by The Three Muskateers movie.

Way way way way back in the day, how do you think a poor person who traveled far away from home eventually traveled back home? I realize there were maps, but I personally don't think that peasants had access to them. Maps were probably few and far between back then. I imagine getting back home would be harder and harder the further away you got. Do you think that once they left, that was it?

Yea, this is lame, but it's been bothering me! BTW, the movie is really good if you're into a Pirates of the Caribbean type movie. 

Photobucket

Re: Lame-O question spurred by The Three Muskateers movie.

  • Most peasants didn't leave home back in the day.

  • There weren't very many roads back then, right? If you wanted to travel from one town to the next there wasn't a highway and an interstate between the two. I guess it was much more simple back then as far as how to get from one place to the next. 
    *Old Nestie, New Name*

  • imageMaryJaneWatz:
    If you wanted to travel from one town to the next there wasn't a highway and an interstate between the two.

    I guess it was much more simple back then as far as how to get from one place to the next. 

    These two sentences contradict each other. Please tell me what is more simple than getting on an interstate and getting off at the (clearly labeled) exit.

    And where exactly are these peasants going? Vacation? Business conferences?

  • imageLucille Bluth:

    imageMaryJaneWatz:
    If you wanted to travel from one town to the next there wasn't a highway and an interstate between the two.

    I guess it was much more simple back then as far as how to get from one place to the next. 

    These two sentences contradict each other. Please tell me what is more simple than getting on an interstate and getting off at the (clearly labeled) exit.

    And where exactly are these peasants going? Vacation? Business conferences?

    I was thinking simple as in one way to get to and from a place. In a sense I guess there one road was the interstate. That's assuming there was one road I really have no idea. 

    Also, I'm not sure L3 means peasants  as in the beggars on the street. I took it to mean the merchants and other lower class people. Maybe I'm wrong.

    ETA: I lol'd at the vacation/business conference.  

    *Old Nestie, New Name*

  • There weren't that many classes back then.  The OP said 'poor people'.  That means peasants to me.
  • Idk where they're going. This is all hypothetical. Say they're recuited into war and after so many years in the service they can go home (a la Gladiator). If Russel Crowe hadn't died, how would he have gotten back home to his presumably not dead wife and kid? Or say young adult peasant boy wants to go to the big village he heard of in passing to find work and make better money for his family. How would he get back to his family to bring them said money?

    I agree that it seems to me that less roads would make it harder to get home. Not easier. 

    Another idea is they get home by word of mouth. Just ask everyone for directions as they go. 

    Photobucket
  • Also peasants do not equal beggars to me. I'm thinking poor farmer who has to pay for his land and has four kids to feed type thing. Like lower working class. I highly doubt beggars were traveling to a fro for better work.
    Photobucket
  • I honestly really think some historical knowledge would be of benefit here.  Back in the musketeer days, people that didn't have lots of money, really didn't have money, or they were a soldier in which case they didn't have money, but at least they were 'taken care of' so to speak.  Most people lived and died in their same villages without ever traveling the way we do now.  They didn't have the money for transportation or food/lodging to get from one place to another, which were usually few and far between anyway.

    ETA: So the hypothetical you're trying to create and find answers for really wasn't the case.

  • imageLoonyLunaLovegood:
    Also peasants do not equal beggars to me. I'm thinking poor farmer who has to pay for his land and has four kids to feed type thing. Like lower working class. I highly doubt beggars were traveling to a fro for better work.

    This is the point here. Poor farmers and people like that (which was the vast majority of people) didn't travel at all because they were farming their land. Their kids didn't travel because they were working on the farm too. So this was a non-issue.

  • All of that I understand, but you really don't think one of those soldiers eventually wants to travel back home? 
    Photobucket
  • I would like to thank the 4 of you for this thread. I really needed a good laugh and this did it. I don't know what my favorite part is, LB's vacation/business conference comment, L3's constant rambles of unending silly hypotheical questions, MJW desperately trying to make sense of what it is L3 is asking and attempting to answer her, or Madisen trying to bring an end to all the madness with a little (much needed) history lesson. Love.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Damn you all.

    I find it really hard to believe that some poor kid didn't have the moxy to make it better for himself, even back in the day. There are even stories in the bible that have poor people traveling great distances in famine to get grain for their family to bring back home. Dudes even traveled to different countries to find a chick to marry. If you dont believe the bible is true, you have to believe that the stories are rooted in some kind of truth.  It might not have been the norm, but I'm sure it sometimes happened.


    Photobucket
  • Hey, no damning me. I'm on your side. =)

    I see your point. Other than God telling them how did Jesus and the Apostles know how to get to where they were traveling?  How did Moses know how to get to that mountain? How did Aladdin know how to get to the Geni? How did Simba know how to get back to the Pride Land? (I may have taken that a little far.) 

    *Old Nestie, New Name*

  • I'm loling at Simba and Aladdin.
    Photobucket
  • There's your answer.  Any kind of traveling back in the day was miraculous. *cough*
  • Ummmmmmmmmm breadcrumbs.
    "You can make more friends in two months by becoming interested in other people than you can in two years by trying to get other people interested in you." - Dale Carnegie
  • imagejenhappy:
    Ummmmmmmmmm breadcrumbs.
     

    image

    Nooooooooooo

     

     

     

    Yes. This is the best explanation so far!  

    Photobucket
  • Magic beans!
    *Old Nestie, New Name*

  • imageclseale13:

    I would like to thank the 4 of you for this thread. I really needed a good laugh and this did it. I don't know what my favorite part is, LB's vacation/business conference comment, L3's constant rambles of unending silly hypotheical questions, MJW desperately trying to make sense of what it is L3 is asking and attempting to answer her, or Madisen trying to bring an end to all the madness with a little (much needed) history lesson. Love.

    I 2nd this.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Ok, well, wait.  Are we talking about the early/middle/late Middle Ages? Are we talking about early Renaissance when the Musketeers existed? Are we talking about Biblical times? Because each one of those hypotheticals are completely different.

    In Europe, poor people really didn't travel nor did they own land. They lived on land owned by someone else and farmed it for them and therefore owed their lives and livelihood to them. If a soldier went on a Crusade or a pilgrim went to the holy land, then yes, they eventually tried to make it home although the vast majority of them just died thanks to robbery/war/the plague/crappy health/crappy food/horrible weather and inappropriate clothing/the odds. Recently I did a family tree back to that era and most of the men in the 1300s died in Palestine, ie, the Crusades and one of those guys got the plague on the way. Maybe 1 made it back. They were gone for years and essentially spent their adult life expectancy away from home.

    In Biblical times, it was somewhat different because there was more land to go around, but if you left, you didn't usually leave on your own--you just took your family with you. Unless you were a poor young man, and then you might leave on your own, but you didn't go far. The people that did, if they intended to come back, took note of the stars, landmarks, length of travel, etc. But generally trips were very long because they just stopped and lived there along the way. That said, anyone trying to make it better for themselves mostly didn't, unless they were extremely charismatic, because it was nearly impossible to change classes, especially if you had nothing to start with.

  • But, DP, where's your sense of out-of-the-box thinking??  Surely, what we know about history pertaining to travel must be wrong.
  • imageMadisen:
    But, DP, where's your sense of out-of-the-box thinking??  Surely, what we know about history pertaining to travel must be wrong.
    See, that is my biggest pet peeve of historical fiction movies: the application of today's American lifestyle and viewpoints to times in which they did not exist.
  • By the way, most of the soldiers in that era, including the gladiator era, were not poor. They were landed gentry, so they didn't need to make names for themselves. Their obligation to go to war wasn't because of their lack of money, but rather because they had money and owed fealty to the king/emperor/whatever. Poor people couldn't afford to leave for war because that involved furnishing your own horses, armour, weaponry, tents, and food. It could bankrupt even a very rich person to go to war, and it often did. A lord might request that his vassals go to war with him, but those were usually local wars, not long distance ones, because he would need those people to maintain his land in an extended absence.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards