What's Cooking?
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Question about shrimp pasta

Do you peel your shrimp before putting it in the pasta? Do you remove the tail? I've seen in several recipes and just watched Giada leave the tails on when serving a pasta meant to be eaten with a fork.

I've always removed the tail and the shell, unless it is meant to be eaten with my fingers. 

This is normal right?  What do you do?

Re: Question about shrimp pasta

  • I always remove the shell. It bothers me when restaurants leave that last bit on. I get that it's for presentation but I don't want to leave any meat in there so then I have to bust out my knife and fork skills to get the meat out without using my hands (which I've gotten pretty good at). It's just inconvenient and I don't see what benefit there is to leaving it on. 
  • I always remove the shell, but not always the tail. Depends on my mood and if I feel like digging my dish while I'm eating or not! :)
  • See, my hubby loves eating the tail because he likes the "crunch". lol
  • I remove the shell and the tails because I'm not remotely coordinated enough to get the tail meat out consistently, so I get frustrated with it. 

    When it's all said and done, what matters most is your relationships with other people; without good friends and family, what's the point?
    My Cooking Blog
    My Baby Blog
  • I definitely remove the tail, as well as peel it.  I just want to eat when I sit down to eat, not mess with my food...
  • (almost) always leave the tail on, only leave the shell on if we're boiling them, for flavor, then peel as we go. Though I don't really know why I do that, now that I think about it....
    image
  • I always remove the shell and the tail.
  • In this case, I remove everything. I don't want to be bothered with the tail while I'm trying to eat my pasta dish
  • For pasta I'll take the peel and tail off. For frying or skewering, I'll peel but leave the tail on.
    Tide and Thyme , My food blog.
  • imageKevinslady:
    See, my hubby loves eating the tail because he likes the "crunch". lol

    That would be my husband as well! Does he eat the chicken cartilage too?!

  • imageaamadore:

    imageKevinslady:
    See, my hubby loves eating the tail because he likes the "crunch". lol

    That would be my husband as well! Does he eat the chicken cartilage too?!

    He draws the line there...at least I think. haha

  • imageBridgetMc:
    I definitely remove the tail, as well as peel it.  I just want to eat when I sit down to eat, not mess with my food...

    This!

    Anniversary

  • imageoct11bride03:
    I always remove the shell. It bothers me when restaurants leave that last bit on. I get that it's for presentation but I don't want to leave any meat in there so then I have to bust out my knife and fork skills to get the meat out without using my hands (which I've gotten pretty good at). It's just inconvenient and I don't see what benefit there is to leaving it on. 

    Ditto for me.  

    image
  • Most of the time I do, but sometimes I don't.  Cooking the shrimp in the shell gives it a lot of extra flavor and I'm not going to peel hot shrimp.  So if I cook it in the shell I serve it in the shell and let everyone fend for themselves.
    Master of Disguise
    image
  • imageoct11bride03:
    I always remove the shell. It bothers me when restaurants leave that last bit on. I get that it's for presentation but I don't want to leave any meat in there so then I have to bust out my knife and fork skills to get the meat out without using my hands (which I've gotten pretty good at). It's just inconvenient and I don't see what benefit there is to leaving it on. 

    Ditto... I always peel completely and remove the tails.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I leave the tails on, I have a notion that this helps keep the shrimp from drying out but that could all be in my head.

     

    image
    Yeah that's right my name's Yauch!
  • I can't stand having to cut the tail off in restaurants either, esp if they've left so much that I lose the meat inside too... I always remove shells & tail if sauteeing but I do leave the whole deal on if I'm roasting them, then let them cool a little & remove it all to add to dish. 
  • I've tried to be "fancy" a few times and leave the tails on, then I realized that my guests don't feel very fancy when they're trying to remove a tail without using their fingers at the dinner table and one somehow flies across the table. From now on I'll remove the tails.

      Side note - I know I shouldn't be surprised since bones don't seem to bother locals in China, but I still can't get over how often shrimp is served HEAD on, tail on, and skin on. Makes eating a little tricky for me.

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards