Politics & Current Events
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

These are the welfare stories that make me mad, NYS is to blame for making it too easy.

http://www.wivb.com/dpp/news/crime/lottery-winner-to-face-charges-in-court

ALBION, N.Y. (WIVB) - Many people have been fired up over the case of a lotto winner who is accused of collecting welfare benefits. Tuesday, the accused scammer returns to court.

Anthony Palermo is guaranteed $1 million in lottery winnings. But he's accused of illegally collecting benefits paid with your tax dollars, Tuesday he'll be back in Albion town court.

Fourteen years ago, Anthony Palermo won New York State?s ?Win for Life? scratch-off game. The Albion man has been collecting $1,000 every week and, up to now, has collected almost $750,000.

For the last seven months, officials say he?s been collecting state aide meant for the poor.

Orleans County Chief Administrative officer Chuck Nesbitt said, ?In Orleans County we take this very seriously and if you want to try and cheat the system this is not the place to do it.?

Last week, 51-year-old Palermo was arrested for welfare fraud.

Nesbitt says the state should have stricter rules in place to prevent things like this from happening.

Nesbitt said, ?Most recently the state has rolled back some of the requirements in terms of medicaid eligibility. In fact applicants don't even have to appear in person now. They can fill out an application online and begin receiving medicaid.?

Officials say Palermo collected about $4,000 in Medicaid, HEAP and Emergency Cash assistance benefits.

 

image
«1

Re: These are the welfare stories that make me mad, NYS is to blame for making it too easy.

  • This seems like it is taking the proper course.  Someone misused the system, it was discovered, he will likely get convicted of a crime for it.  I don't think this means that we should then make it more difficult for the people who really need it as a result.
    Lilypie Pregnancy tickers Lilypie Fifth Birthday tickers
  • imagecookiemdough:
    This seems like it is taking the proper course.  Someone misused the system, it was discovered, he will likely get convicted of a crime for it.  I don't think this means that we should then make it more difficult for the people who really need it as a result.

    Just imagine how many people that aren't getting caught.  There needs to be stricter rules IMO.

    image
  • imageSaraKathryn:

    imagecookiemdough:
    This seems like it is taking the proper course.  Someone misused the system, it was discovered, he will likely get convicted of a crime for it.  I don't think this means that we should then make it more difficult for the people who really need it as a result.

    Just imagine how many people that aren't getting caught.  There needs to be stricter rules IMO.

    I don't know, 5?

    Lilypie Pregnancy tickers Lilypie Fifth Birthday tickers
  • imageSaraKathryn:

    imagecookiemdough:
    This seems like it is taking the proper course.  Someone misused the system, it was discovered, he will likely get convicted of a crime for it.  I don't think this means that we should then make it more difficult for the people who really need it as a result.

    Just imagine how many people that aren't getting caught.  There needs to be stricter rules IMO.

    Do you really think that there are lots of lottery winners collecting welfare benefits? 

  • imageSaraKathryn:

    Just imagine how many people that aren't getting caught.  There needs to be stricter rules IMO.

    I'm not necessarily opposed to stricter regulations, but I would want those regulations to be enacted after a comprehensive audit to determine how widespread fraud is and how it's being perpetrated. To best craft the new regulations, you would need a study regarding the best ways to eliminate fraud without harming honest people who need help.  The problem with the kneejerk "make it stricter!" rallying cry is that it often leads to poor policy decisions that don't achieve the objectives and have serious unintended negative consequences.  Making policy on assumptions about fraud without actual data is not a good idea.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Has he received his payout yet? I wonder if there was a gap in time between winning and receiving his money.

    There ARE strict rules, hence him going to court.

    A big old middle finger to you, stupid Nest.
  • imageSaraKathryn:

    Just imagine how many people that aren't getting caught.  There needs to be stricter rules IMO.

    This was my reaction.  I can't wrap my head around the idea of doing nothing more than filling out a form on the interwebz and proceeding to collect Medicaid. Is there really no requirement other than one's averment of need? 

  • imagepixy_stix:

    Has he received his payout yet? I wonder if there was a gap in time between winning and receiving his money.

    There ARE strict rules, hence him going to court.

    if it's a win for life then he probably is.  IIRC the article said he's been collecting for several years.

    as for the rest, i am just not in the mood today for pointless panty-wadding.  states are cutting back staffs drastically.  i didn't have to show up to collect UE either.  there aren't even that many people manning the phones anymore.

    i'd love to know what the OP suggests as effective "stricter rules" for preventing fraud.  LOVE it.

    proof that i make babies. jack, grace, and ben, in no particular order
    imageimageimage
  • imagejillboston:
    imageSaraKathryn:

    imagecookiemdough:
    This seems like it is taking the proper course.  Someone misused the system, it was discovered, he will likely get convicted of a crime for it.  I don't think this means that we should then make it more difficult for the people who really need it as a result.

    Just imagine how many people that aren't getting caught.  There needs to be stricter rules IMO.

    Do you really think that there are lots of lottery winners collecting welfare benefits? 

    Nope, not a lot of lottery winners.

    image
  • Hi, former NY policy analyst here.  We spend more in fraud prevention than the cost of the fraud itself.  Just for people like you!
    TTC since 07/11 Me: 32 AO PCOS/DH: 32 Lowish count/motility IUI#1-3 = BFN (Clomid, Clomid-->Femara, Injects) IVF#1 ER on 9/24 19 ER/19 M/9 F w/ICSI Transferred a 5AA and a 5BB on 9/29 Beta 10/9 = 139 Beta 10/11 = 287
    imageimageAlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers

    My Blog

  • imagelaurenpetro:

    as for the rest, i am just not in the mood today for pointless panty-wadding.  states are cutting back staffs drastically.  i didn't have to show up to collect UE either.  there aren't even that many people manning the phones anymore.

    i'd love to know what the OP suggests as effective "stricter rules" for preventing fraud.  LOVE it.

    It's like the argument that we should be drug testing everyone. The facts and figures show that the majority of the people using the system are NOT defrauding the government. Not only that, making it "stricter" and having more rules and regulations to have staff check up on ultimately costs the government more money.

    A big old middle finger to you, stupid Nest.
  • imagepixy_stix:
    Not only that, making it "stricter" and having more rules and regulations to have staff check up on ultimately costs the government more money.

    Well, you know, if public employees weren't so greedy and didn't want benefits along with their $38,000/year salaries and glamorous surroundings in human services buildings, maybe states could afford to hire more of them!  HTH.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Hang on. $1k a week = $52k a year, minus taxes (anyone know what these are?). If he's not working and this is his sole income, that's really not a lot of money. He's not rolling around in his millions like Scrooge McDuck.

    (Sorry, I'm really slow this morning. Bad kiddo night, plus dropping my coffee this morning is making me a zombie.)

    ETA: Cause I do math good.

    A big old middle finger to you, stupid Nest.
  • imagepixy_stix:

    Hang on. $1k a week = $48k a year, minus taxes (anyone know what these are?). If he's not working and this is his sole income, that's really not a lot of money. He's not rolling around in his millions like Scrooge McDuck.

    (Sorry, I'm really slow this morning. Bad kiddo night, plus dropping my coffee this morning is making me a zombie.)

    Clearly.  Because there are 52 weeks in a year.  :)

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagebrideymcbriderson:
    imagepixy_stix:

    Hang on. $1k a week = $48k a year, minus taxes (anyone know what these are?). If he's not working and this is his sole income, that's really not a lot of money. He's not rolling around in his millions like Scrooge McDuck.

    (Sorry, I'm really slow this morning. Bad kiddo night, plus dropping my coffee this morning is making me a zombie.)

    Clearly.  Because there are 52 weeks in a year.  :)

    ::head desk:: NEVERMIND! Carry on without me. Embarrassed

    A big old middle finger to you, stupid Nest.
  • imagepixy_stix:

    Hang on. $1k a week = $48k a year, minus taxes (anyone know what these are?). If he's not working and this is his sole income, that's really not a lot of money. He's not rolling around in his millions like Scrooge McDuck.

    (Sorry, I'm really slow this morning. Bad kiddo night, plus dropping my coffee this morning is making me a zombie.)

    are lottery winnings taxed like casino wins?  if so, i think that's in the 40's.

    proof that i make babies. jack, grace, and ben, in no particular order
    imageimageimage
  • imagepixy_stix:
    imagebrideymcbriderson:
    imagepixy_stix:

    Hang on. $1k a week = $48k a year, minus taxes (anyone know what these are?). If he's not working and this is his sole income, that's really not a lot of money. He's not rolling around in his millions like Scrooge McDuck.

    (Sorry, I'm really slow this morning. Bad kiddo night, plus dropping my coffee this morning is making me a zombie.)

    Clearly.  Because there are 52 weeks in a year.  :)

    ::head desk:: NEVERMIND! Carry on without me. Embarrassed

    I don't have kids, and I drank my coffee, and I didn't catch this until it was pointed out. Damn mornings... Wink

  • imagebrideymcbriderson:
    imageSaraKathryn:

    Just imagine how many people that aren't getting caught.  There needs to be stricter rules IMO.

    I'm not necessarily opposed to stricter regulations, but I would want those regulations to be enacted after a comprehensive audit to determine how widespread fraud is and how it's being perpetrated. To best craft the new regulations, you would need a study regarding the best ways to eliminate fraud without harming honest people who need help.  The problem with the kneejerk "make it stricter!" rallying cry is that it often leads to poor policy decisions that don't achieve the objectives and have serious unintended negative consequences.  Making policy on assumptions about fraud without actual data is not a good idea.

    There are some pretty decent studies of welfare fraud out there in my field. What most find is that the two most common ways of committing fraud are: 1., living with someone (usually a boyfriend but sometimes a parent, sibling, friend, or other relative) and not reporting their income (if they're lucky enough to have any) and 2., not reporting if your child's father gives you $20 to buy new clothes for your daughter or in-kind items (like a pack of diapers or a can of formula) for your son.

    It seems like it's more trouble (and far more money) than it's worth to track down Sarah and Tony and make them pay the government back the $6.00 that they owe.

  • I admit, I'm raising an eyebrow about it taking 14 years to figure out this guy was scamming the system, but...they caught him and will demand that he pay the money back (I assume?). So we'll make him pay for his crime with his $1,000 weekly money for life - that can be garnished, right?

  • imagemarie427:

    I admit, I'm raising an eyebrow about it taking 14 years to figure out this guy was scamming the system, but...they caught him and will demand that he pay the money back (I assume?). So we'll make him pay for his crime with his $1,000 weekly money for life - that can be garnished, right?

    According to the story, it didn't take 14 years to figure out this guy was scamming the system.  It took 7 months.

    Fourteen years ago, Anthony Palermo won New York State?s ?Win for Life? scratch-off game. The Albion man has been collecting $1,000 every week and, up to now, has collected almost $750,000.

    For the last seven months, officials say he?s been collecting state aide meant for the poor.

    ... 

    Officials say Palermo collected about $4,000 in Medicaid, HEAP and Emergency Cash assistance benefits.

    So he's collected about $4,000 in benefits over 7 months and has been caught.  It's bad that anyone scams the system, but it seems like the fraud detection program is working.  Hell, it's working better than any oversight of Enron ever worked, right?

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagemarie427:

    I admit, I'm raising an eyebrow about it taking 14 years to figure out this guy was scamming the system, but...they caught him and will demand that he pay the money back (I assume?). So we'll make him pay for his crime with his $1,000 weekly money for life - that can be garnished, right?

    He's been scamming the system for 7 months, right? It doesn't surprise me it would take that long to notice a weird pattern.

  • From the article:

    Officials say Palermo collected about $4,000 in Medicaid, HEAP and Emergency Cash assistance benefits.

    That's it? Is that in the last 14 years? Or in the last year? Regardless, that seems like a pretty sh!tty deal. 

  • OK, seriously people, read the article.  It's not that long.  7 months.  $4,000 in benefits.  He's been receiving lottery winnings for the last 14 years.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Clearly I need to stop skimming articles.

    Still though, garnish the man's winnings until he's paid up and then call it a day. I don't think we need to spend even more resources that NYS is better off spending for anything else in order to prevent welfare fraud because of this one guy.

  • imagebrideymcbriderson:

    OK, seriously people, read the article.  It's not that long.  7 months.  $4,000 in benefits.  He's been receiving lottery winnings for the last 14 years.

    :oD More coffee for everyone!

    A big old middle finger to you, stupid Nest.
  • imagebrideymcbriderson:
    imageSaraKathryn:

    Just imagine how many people that aren't getting caught.  There needs to be stricter rules IMO.

    I'm not necessarily opposed to stricter regulations, but I would want those regulations to be enacted after a comprehensive audit to determine how widespread fraud is and how it's being perpetrated. To best craft the new regulations, you would need a study regarding the best ways to eliminate fraud without harming honest people who need help.  The problem with the kneejerk "make it stricter!" rallying cry is that it often leads to poor policy decisions that don't achieve the objectives and have serious unintended negative consequences.  Making policy on assumptions about fraud without actual data is not a good idea.

    This is where I'm at. As much as I think welfare needs work it needs to be done in a way that makes sense based on hard data about what fraud is taking place, and how prevelant it is so that any changes made actually fix the problem rather than just make people feel better.

    Plus I'd rather have a handful of people commiting fraud than kids go without because of a kneejerk reaction.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagepixy_stix:
    imagebrideymcbriderson:

    OK, seriously people, read the article.  It's not that long.  7 months.  $4,000 in benefits.  He's been receiving lottery winnings for the last 14 years.

    :oD More coffee for everyone!

    Yes

    Coffee

    proof that i make babies. jack, grace, and ben, in no particular order
    imageimageimage
  • imagebrideymcbriderson:

    OK, seriously people, read the article.  It's not that long.  7 months.  $4,000 in benefits.  He's been receiving lottery winnings for the last 14 years.

    Okay, so withhold a month's (or more with taxes?) worth of his winnings to pay that back. Done and done.

  • imagepixy_stix:
    imagebrideymcbriderson:
    OK, seriously people, read the article.  It's not that long.  7 months.  $4,000 in benefits.  He's been receiving lottery winnings for the last 14 years.

    :oD More coffee for everyone!

    A truly excellent idea!

    Team Basement Cat imageKnitting&Kitties
  • imagelaurenpetro:
    imagepixy_stix:
    imagebrideymcbriderson:

    OK, seriously people, read the article.  It's not that long.  7 months.  $4,000 in benefits.  He's been receiving lottery winnings for the last 14 years.

    :oD More coffee for everyone!

    Yes

    Coffee

    F you people.  F you all.

    groomy is insisting I cut back on my coffee consumption because we think I have moderate IBS, which is being made worse by my shittastic work environment.

    I've only had 2 cups today, and one was not a full sized cup.  I AM CRANKY.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards