Politics & Current Events
Dear Community,
Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.
If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.
Thank you.
Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.
Antidepressants may not be worth the risk, researchers say.
Re: Antidepressants may not be worth the risk, researchers say.
And, once again, lol at sisugal.
Anything you can achieve through hard work, you could also just buy.
And less experience with depression.
<a href="http://www.thenest.com/?utm_source=ticker&utm_medium=HTML&utm_campaign=tickers" title="Home D
Anything you can achieve through hard work, you could also just buy.
Kind of...you said you aren't playing internet doctor, but you also said you have more experience with MMJ. My point is that you're not using MMJ to treat depression, because if you were, you'd know just how unhelpful it is, and that the suggestion is actually harmful.
<a href="http://www.thenest.com/?utm_source=ticker&utm_medium=HTML&utm_campaign=tickers" title="Home D
I'm a big mmj proponent - with experience to boost - but not for depression. If you're not motivated to live life normally then certainly mmj will not help.
My Blog
It's not wrong. I don't think there's anything wrong with more research into something that's not been fully explored, especially something that affects so many people.
But it is wrong to say "the risks outweigh the benefits" full stop when that may not be true for many, many people with depression. And when "risks" and "benefits" seem to include quantity only and not quality. I don't think many people suffering from severe depression would say "I'd rather live depressed for 30 years than not depressed for 29".
Should I even bother to ask for a source for this?
Duh.
<a href="http://www.thenest.com/?utm_source=ticker&utm_medium=HTML&utm_campaign=tickers" title="Home D
/dead
I am a staunch defendant of AD's, but I do agree with Sisugal that they are overprescribed. And I think because of this, we have studies that come out showing they "may not be worth the risk" because everybody and their grandma is on them. If only people who truly needed them used them, the studies may show something else. Does that make sense?
I also agree that they should be monitored closely in pregnancy, but at the same time, a mentally stable pregnant woman/mother is imperative for a healthy baby too. And if that takes AD's, fine. I'm not about to legislate what women can do wtih their bodies, including during pg.
Anything you can achieve through hard work, you could also just buy.
+1
<a href="http://www.thenest.com/?utm_source=ticker&utm_medium=HTML&utm_campaign=tickers" title="Home D
I'm not really seeing this happening at all. Are you? And FWIW my post was meant to say that other methods of dealing along with AD's would be helpful.
edited to say that I did not phrase my first post right. Aside was the wrong word. I meant with. Honestly my mom would not be alive today without AD's..I have no problem with them.
Back when I was a kid and my mom was in a hospital being treated it seemed like no one else was dealing with this. Now it seems much less stigmatized and it seems like people are on board with treating it with meds.
I have studied/worked in mental health and I am aware that their are untreated people out there and I am aware that in many cultures there is still a big stigma attached to mental health problems. But there has been a huge and undeniable cultural shift over the past 20 years.
And my point was that it's best to model other ways of emotion management in conjunction with AD's so that the kids of depressed parents have those skills as they mature into adulthood.
I don't have time to read that right now but will later.
And FWIW I was not intending on getting into an argument about this. I have a huge heart for those suffering and have dealt with this most of my life. I just feel strongly that kids of parents suffering from mental illness are modeled alternate ways of dealing with stress/emotions.
But I for one am happy that it is talked about today much more than when I was younger. No one wants to feel isolated.
edited to add..I am sure this will go over like a turd in a punch bowl.. but many meds used to deal with extreme depression do dull emotions so that alernate methods of dealing with lifes ups and downs are not necessarily used. Sorry but it's true!
I don't think anyone would argue against providing kids (or adults) with emotional coping skills. That's a good idea no matter what. But sometimes coping skills aren't enough.
Maybe I'm just not hanging out with the right people but I don't know anyone who wanted to go on antidepressants just for the fun of it or when they didn't really need it. If anything, it's the opposite - they really need medication, and their doctors have suggested it, but refuse to consider it because they feel like they shouldn't need it, that they should able to do without it, they don't like the potential side effects, they don't believe it will really help.
I don't think I said any of that! Just for the fun of it? What?