Politics & Current Events
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

O'Malley: we're not better off now than we were 4 years ago

Oops?

http://www.businessinsider.com/martin-omalley-obama-romney-better-off-four-years-2012-9

He says "but that's not the question of this election."  Really?  It is going to be hard to convince people of that, especially since Obama said it'd be a one-shot proposition, and his voters had those high hopes.

"I want the left to know they screwed with the wrong guy." -This signature may or may not have been selectively edited.

Re: O'Malley: we're not better off now than we were 4 years ago

  • Did anyone who followed politics actually think we'd be better off in 4 years?

     

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • And O'Malley seems to be blaming Bush, not Obama, for it not being better than it was 4 years ago.

    The question," he continued, "without a doubt, we are not as well off as we were before George Bush brought us the Bush job losses, the Bush recession, the Bush deficits, the series of desert wars, charged for the first time to credit cards, the national credit card..."


     

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I kinda think we are screwed regardless.  I do think the economy is going to weigh really big on this election.  more so than abortions, religion, and same sex marriage.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Its like the economy for Bush's first term before 9/11, that, whether you believe it to be good or bad, was due to Clinton's term as pres. Bush Sr's policies showed their economic results when Clinton was in office.
    imageimageimageimage
  • imageFezzesAreCool:

    And O'Malley seems to be blaming Bush, not Obama, for it not being better than it was 4 years ago.

    The question," he continued, "without a doubt, we are not as well off as we were before George Bush brought us the Bush job losses, the Bush recession, the Bush deficits, the series of desert wars, charged for the first time to credit cards, the national credit card..."


     

    Fez, you're not helping them glaze over the facts if you point out the things they're deliberately not reading.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I'd say we are better off now than we were 4 years ago.

    4 years ago the real estate bubble had popped and the economy was in a tail spin. The unemployment rate was marginally better than it was now, but there were almost no jobs out there for job seekers (I know, I was seeking at the time). Although there is a lot of competition for job postings, at least there are postings, and things are getting better.

    Obama can also legitimately say the Republican congress has intentionally sabotaged the recovery, especially job growth. But the fact is, things both feel better than they did 4 years ago and they are still improving.

    -My son was born in April 2012. He pretty much rules. -This might be the one place on the internet where it's feasible someone would pretend to be an Adult Man.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards