Nest Book Club
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Same story, different POV

I've read a few of these - Hopeless/Losing Hope, Beautiful Disaster/Walking Disaster, and so on - but now it seems like every single new adult / older YA book has a companion book that is exactly the same plot but told from the guy's perspective.  And it's getting old.  It's like authors are either not telling the full story to begin with or are dipping back into the well because the first book was well received.  What happened to the good, old-fashioned sequel?  The what happens next story or even a completely new story centering on different characters from the first book?  Why does it have to be exactly the same story?

 

image
«1

Re: Same story, different POV

  • I hate this trend.  I refuse to read the companion book.
    75 Books in 2015?
    image

    photo OutlanderMafia.jpg  
    It's slippery as waterweed.
  • I never read companion books. I think they're stupid. 

    image image
              Elizabeth Salom (elistar)'s book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf)

  • Hopeless/Losing Hope were my first companion books I have read.  First and last. 

    image


    Joyce's book recommendations, favorite quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf)



    image

  • Are these the same events from the different POV? Like Twilight/Midnight Sun?
    image image image
    Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
  • Are these the same events from the different POV? Like Twilight/Midnight Sun?
    Yes.  I refuse to pay for the SAME STORY.  I can live without another POV.
    75 Books in 2015?
    image

    photo OutlanderMafia.jpg  
    It's slippery as waterweed.
  • MrsJenE said:
    Are these the same events from the different POV? Like Twilight/Midnight Sun?
    Yes.  I refuse to pay for the SAME STORY.  I can live without another POV.
    Oh yeah...that's annoying.

    I was thinking about Gayle Forman's books, or like TIME BETWEEN US/TIME AFTER TIME, but those at least continue the story and have something new happening.
    image image image
    Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
  • MrsJenE said:
    Are these the same events from the different POV? Like Twilight/Midnight Sun?
    Yes.  I refuse to pay for the SAME STORY.  I can live without another POV.
    Oh yeah...that's annoying.

    I was thinking about Gayle Forman's books, or like TIME BETWEEN US/TIME AFTER TIME, but those at least continue the story and have something new happening.
    I haven't read Time After Time yet, but Gayle Forman's don't count because they're a continuation of the story, not the same exact story.  
    75 Books in 2015?
    image

    photo OutlanderMafia.jpg  
    It's slippery as waterweed.
  • JUNEWHATEVS.
    image imageimage
  • MrsJenE said:
    MrsJenE said:
    Are these the same events from the different POV? Like Twilight/Midnight Sun?
    Yes.  I refuse to pay for the SAME STORY.  I can live without another POV.
    Oh yeah...that's annoying.

    I was thinking about Gayle Forman's books, or like TIME BETWEEN US/TIME AFTER TIME, but those at least continue the story and have something new happening.
    I haven't read Time After Time yet, but Gayle Forman's don't count because they're a continuation of the story, not the same exact story.  
    TIME AFTER TIME is the same as her books...picks up where the other one left off but in the other POV.

    I think it's pretty annoying to try to sell the same exact story from the opposite POV. If you wanted both POVs shared, then write a dual POV or omniscient POV story in the first place.
    8-|
    image image image
    Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
  • MrsJenE said:
    MrsJenE said:
    Are these the same events from the different POV? Like Twilight/Midnight Sun?
    Yes.  I refuse to pay for the SAME STORY.  I can live without another POV.
    Oh yeah...that's annoying.

    I was thinking about Gayle Forman's books, or like TIME BETWEEN US/TIME AFTER TIME, but those at least continue the story and have something new happening.
    I haven't read Time After Time yet, but Gayle Forman's don't count because they're a continuation of the story, not the same exact story.  
    TIME AFTER TIME is the same as her books...picks up where the other one left off but in the other POV.

    I think it's pretty annoying to try to sell the same exact story from the opposite POV. If you wanted both POVs shared, then write a dual POV or omniscient POV story in the first place.
    8-|
    Exactly. If the other POV was worth reading, you would have/should have put it in the first book.
    image imageimage
  • Ditto @hoycie.  Hopeless/Losing Hope were my first and last experience with companion books.  Did not like.
    imageimage image
  • edited January 2014
    I very rarely care about the male point of view in a book. So if the two POVs are female/male, then I read the female one and don't even wonder what the male was thinking.

    ETA - I should say that I do care about the male POV in a book that does not have a companion book from a female POV (like in Will Grayson, Will Grayson, for example...OF COURSE, I cared about the male POV in that book). And now I feel like I sound like a total man-hater. 
    image

    "No longer lend your strength to that which you wish to be free from." -Jewel

  • I don't necessarily hate different pov books but I was a little disappointed in Losing Hope. It left out a lot of what happened in Hopeless and was very choppy. It'd still read Midnight Sun if it was finally released! =)
    Robin
    <><
    Tizzle 10/07 ~ Boppy 7/09 ~ Chicken 1/12

    Robin (jason&robin)'s book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (currently-reading shelf)

    2014 Reading Goal: 85

  • I have Hopeless waiting for me on my Kindle but I haven't picked it up yet. If I hadn't read this thread, I would have thought that the second book was a continuation of the first.

    image

    My favorite Cake Wreck ever.


  • Hopeless was really good.  I loved it!  But then Losing Hope was kind of the exact same thing.  And by kind of, I mean exactly.
    imageimage image
  • I could live without companion books. I read Losing Hope but would have preferred to see the second POV in the first book. It would have made it so much more.
  • Colleen Hoover is definitely a very guilty party here.  I liked Hopeless... so I read Slammed.  It was alright!  But the next book was kind of bad.  The third book was AWFUL. 

    That definitely changed my mind about reading Losing Hope.  It would be a complete waste of time.   The only time I MIGHT read it?  Is if I was desperate for a re-read of Hopeless 5 or 10 years down the line.  Then I perhaps would choose to read it from the dude's point of view. 
    Daisypath Happy Birthday tickers
    Lilypie - (sGpn)

  • I would read Midnight Sun if it was released too. I actually didn't think what I read of it thus far was that bad. But I totally get what you're saying! 9/10 companion books are very annoying. The only other not annoying companion book I read is the one from Slammed (same author as Hopeless). While it was "re-told" to an extent, there was a lot added to it too! 
    image
  • I am really not a fan of this trend either. I haven't read Hopeless yet but if I do I'll probably hold off on the companion story. Two POVs in one book are far more palatable than two books with the exact same story.
    image
  • I love how everyone is like, "Yeah!  I hate it!  I'll never read another!"

    Until someone mentions HP.  Then we're all like, "Sign me up!!!"

    lololololol!!!!  I love it!  (And I feel the same way!)  :)

  • mrsvedo said:
    I haven't read a companion book. Not because I'm against them on principal, but because I'd REALLY have to love a story to re-read it from a different POV. So far, none of these stories have grabbed me. That said, if the Harry Potter books were re-released from Hermoine's perspective....I'd be all about it.

    OMG I would give all my earthly posessions to have all the HP books rewritten from Dumbledore's perspective.
    Okay, this would be amazing.  BUT - it wouldn't be the same story.  Dumbledore had a lot of other things going on while Harry was learning to be Harry.  I think his tale wouldn't be his take on the exact same story line, but a completely different story that just happened to occur at the same time, while fighting the same enemy.  But maybe I talked myself into a circle on this one.
    image
  • mrsvedo said:
    I haven't read a companion book. Not because I'm against them on principal, but because I'd REALLY have to love a story to re-read it from a different POV. So far, none of these stories have grabbed me. That said, if the Harry Potter books were re-released from Hermoine's perspective....I'd be all about it.

    OMG I would give all my earthly posessions to have all the HP books rewritten from Dumbledore's perspective.
    Okay, this would be amazing.  BUT - it wouldn't be the same story.  Dumbledore had a lot of other things going on while Harry was learning to be Harry.  I think his tale wouldn't be his take on the exact same story line, but a completely different story that just happened to occur at the same time, while fighting the same enemy.  But maybe I talked myself into a circle on this one.
    Nope.  I get it.  It wouldn't be two people experiencing the same thing at the same time and telling us about it in their own way.  It would be deeper and richer because Dumbledore is a more complex character.  And as an adult, he'd have a perspective that Harry wouldn't.  

    image

    My favorite Cake Wreck ever.


  • I have a couple of Same Story, Different POV books recently and I do not care for them either. I would also read Midnight Sun though. I think that one is different because of Edward's mind-reading ability. :)

     


    image
  • I find this trend annoying too. I read Beautiful Disaster and Hopeless and WILL NOT read their companion books. I don't want to read the same story. And if I did, I'd read the original one over again. Are these mostly done by indie authors or do you think publishers are pushing this for money?
    I write sexy books. I read all the books. I love dresses & macarons.

    image image image 
    image image image
  • Skeezon said:
    I find this trend annoying too. I read Beautiful Disaster and Hopeless and WILL NOT read their companion books. I don't want to read the same story. And if I did, I'd read the original one over again. Are these mostly done by indie authors or do you think publishers are pushing this for money?
    @Skeezon I feel like publishers are the impetus behind this dumb trend. See: VRoth's Four series.
    image imageimage
  • @MrsC7 As long as people keep buying them, authors will keep writing them.
    I write sexy books. I read all the books. I love dresses & macarons.

    image image image 
    image image image
  • @Skeezon This is true. It appears NBC is in the minority.
    image imageimage
  • RevJen said:
    mrsvedo said:
    I haven't read a companion book. Not because I'm against them on principal, but because I'd REALLY have to love a story to re-read it from a different POV. So far, none of these stories have grabbed me. That said, if the Harry Potter books were re-released from Hermoine's perspective....I'd be all about it.

    OMG I would give all my earthly posessions to have all the HP books rewritten from Dumbledore's perspective.
    Okay, this would be amazing.  BUT - it wouldn't be the same story.  Dumbledore had a lot of other things going on while Harry was learning to be Harry.  I think his tale wouldn't be his take on the exact same story line, but a completely different story that just happened to occur at the same time, while fighting the same enemy.  But maybe I talked myself into a circle on this one.
    Nope.  I get it.  It wouldn't be two people experiencing the same thing at the same time and telling us about it in their own way.  It would be deeper and richer because Dumbledore is a more complex character.  And as an adult, he'd have a perspective that Harry wouldn't.  
    Oh absolutely! That's where I was going with this but you put it more eloquently than I could. :)
    image

    my read shelf:
    Sarah (mrs.vedo)'s book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf) 


    Pregnancy Ticker
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards