SCOTUS BC/Hobby Lobby decision

Re: SCOTUS BC/Hobby Lobby decision

• spin25 member

  

  July 2014 edited July 2014

  @aggiebug that's not really true. Insurers might cover Prozac but not sarafem, for example. They are both fluoxetine. I've seen it happen. Of course they might require a generic if it's available, but I'm not sure what that has to do with Viagra. Insurance doesn't just cover sildenafil or fluoxetine. They cover Viagra, revatio, sarafem, Prozac, etc. Formularies list brand names. Also, @backseatdriver is correct, insurers are privy to your health information. They have every right to ask what your Rx is being used for, and they do. You can probably decline to have your info shared with you insurer, citing HIPAA, but then they can decline to pay for you. ETA: formularies do list generic names too, when a generic formulation is available. Which it isn't for Viagra.

  
  

  Report2 Reply
• amandaf6383 member

  

  July 2014

  als1982 said:

  The thing I keep wondering is if Hobby Lobby is so morally concerned about paying for "abortion causing" treatments for its American employees, then why does the company continue to import the vast majority of its goods from China?  You know, the place where abortions are considered common practice.  A country where an estimated 13 million abortion procedures are conducted (compared to 750,000 in the U.S.) and 10 million abortion pills are sold annually.  A woman's reproductive rights < a person/company's religious beliefs < MONEY.  

  
  

  
  

  ^^^^^ In a NON-thrusting way!^^^^^^

  
  

  Cheering on all of my 3T ladies!  DX with PCOS - 11/2012 DH S/A & HSG - Normal - Too many rounds of Clomid = BFNs - New RE 5/2014 - Repeat Testing - Losing 40lbs before injects/IUI

  
  

  Live, Laugh, Love, Lose

  
  

  
  

  
  

  Created by MyFitnessPal - Nutrition Facts For Foods

  Report3 Reply