Last week, during our layover on the trip home from my conference we were sitting in the airport watching CNN Headline news. One of the stories was an investigational story with the lead-in "is your flight toxic?" CNN went to commercial and then once the anchor came back on to introduced the story, the channel was changed. Not by any of us--the airport (or airline or terminal--whoever) changed the channel (I'll be honest, I wasn't sure airports GOT any other channel other than HLN). Once the story was over, it went back to CNN Headline news.
Anyway, I found that action very, very "interesting." Maybe it's because I don't consider myself an over-reactor--I wouldn't listen to that report and then demand to see the air filters on the plane, I'd try to objectively see it from all sides, think about it, research it some more, and then draw my own conclusions. I'm sure there are others that wouldn't react nearly as logically. Buuuttt....it does beg the question, if there wasn't some truth to the story, then why would the airport/airline bother to change the channel??
Would they change the channel to keep passengers "in the dark" about a plane crash too? (I put it in "" because I doubt they would suspend wifi and cell phones from passing along the news.)
WDYT?? I do think they are certainly within their legal rights to do what they did. They don't have to provide ANY televisions at all--I understand they are a courtesy to help pass time. It just sort of makes me raise my eyebrows and wonder....
Re: Discuss: Airport censorship?