North Carolina Nesties
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Healthcare reform bill

«1

Re: Healthcare reform bill

  • It's not perfect, but I think it's a step in the right direction.

    I liked this breakdown of it, it was helpful since I refused to follow anything until after it was passed.  There was too much going on to wrap my brain around all of the changes and discussions.

    I wonder how many people who are against the bill have never had to purchase their own health insurance or make a decision regarding keeping health insurance or risking it w/o because they can't afford it due to UE, other circumstances, etc.  Prior to losing my job I probably would've seen it a bit differently, but now that I've had to go through finding my own insurance and seeing the astronomical costs associated with plans, I'm a bit more sympathetic to the un/underinsured and those who cannot get health insurance on a private plan due to preexisting conditions.

    Baby Charchie born 12/22/2011
  • Well, I think most of you could probably figure out MY leaning on this particular topic.  I'm not in favor of it, though, yes, there are definitely some nice talking points.  My point of view is that at best, this is a states rights issue....but more simply, why don't they make self-provided insurance tax deductable?  I think that would be a major step in the right direction and still really NOT get the federal government involved at all.  I just don't trust the government to efficiently moderate all of these programs and follow through with all these wonderful promises.  

    I have had to pay for my own health insurance, was overwhelmed by the cost and cannot believe (nor could I believe) that it wasn't tax deductible.  Seriously!!  I do wonder how this will affect the owners of my small business and will be interesting to see what drips down to me.

    And when it does (eventually) hit all our pocket books, I will cynically  remind you of one thing:  when it comes to government, there is no bottom to the taxpayers pockets. 

  • imagederky17:

    Well, I think most of you could probably figure out MY leaning on this particular topic.  I'm not in favor of it, though, yes, there are definitely some nice talking points.  My point of view is that at best, this is a states rights issue....but more simply, why don't they make self-provided insurance tax deductable?  I think that would be a major step in the right direction and still really NOT get the federal government involved at all.  I just don't trust the government to efficiently moderate all of these programs and follow through with all these wonderful promises.  

    I have had to pay for my own health insurance, was overwhelmed by the cost and cannot believe (nor could I believe) that it wasn't tax deductible.  Seriously!!  I do wonder how this will affect the owners of my small business and will be interesting to see what drips down to me.

    Re: self-insured people: under certain (ridiculous) conditions it is.  I noticed that this year when I was preparing our taxes, there were 4 conditions that you had to meet, which were basically the same conditions that you had to meet in order to qualify for the COBRA subsidy if you were laid off (weren't eligible for other plans and a few others).  I had big issues with that since I could provide basic, catastrophic insurance for myself cheaper than COBRA, which was interestingly enough cheaper than DH's plan.  I definitely agree, self-insured should be deserving of a tax credit somewhere, and a broader credit at that so it's not hit by the "marriage penalty" and other similar items.

    I did read this morning in the slideshow I posted that small business owners would get incentives (tax credits) for providing insurance.  This is intended to offset the cost of the insurance.  There was a statistic that 95% (although that seems high to me, but I didn't do the study!) of small business owners offer some sort of insurance to their employees.  I'm not sure that it would have a negative effect on the rest of the country.

    Baby Charchie born 12/22/2011
  • Sorry I posted and ran. I meant to come back and contribute to the discussion, but I got stuck.

    Like charch I didn't pay a lot of attention to the bill up to now. I knew it was there & had a vague understanding, but I never really thought they'd pass it to be honest. I'm going to go read the link so maybe I can contribute a little better to the conversation.

    imageuncharch7:

    I wonder how many people who are against the bill have never had to purchase their own health insurance or make a decision regarding keeping health insurance or risking it w/o because they can't afford it due to UE, other circumstances, etc.  Prior to losing my job I probably would've seen it a bit differently, but now that I've had to go through finding my own insurance and seeing the astronomical costs associated with plans, I'm a bit more sympathetic to the un/underinsured and those who cannot get health insurance on a private plan due to preexisting conditions.

    ITA. This thought has crossed my mind a lot.

    I don't know that this bill is really the perfect answer but at least they are doing something. But is there a perfect way to handle the health care issues in the US? No.Nothing is going to make everyone happy. Utopia doesn't exist.

    Derky brigs up a good point about the tax deduction. I hadn't really thought about it because until recently we hadn't looked at self insuring.

     

     

  • Also, I'm surprise this post hasn't seen more action. Doesn't anyone on NC board have opinions anymore?
  • imageshoeaholic0403:
    Also, I'm surprise this post hasn't seen more action. Doesn't anyone on NC board have opinions anymore?
    I have been thinking the same thing.  As much as I hate to say it, the times have changed.  I know I'm not around as much anymore due to the fact that the board has been really slow and just...different, but I do love a good discussion.
    Baby Charchie born 12/22/2011
  • I agree with what Charch said. I haven't read too much about the bill, but from what I've heard I'm all for it. Our health care system has been broken for far too long and something needed to change. This may not be the perfect plan for our country, but it'll be much better than what we currently have and is a big step in the right direction.
  • imageuncharch7:
    imageshoeaholic0403:
    Also, I'm surprise this post hasn't seen more action. Doesn't anyone on NC board have opinions anymore?
    I have been thinking the same thing.  As much as I hate to say it, the times have changed.  I know I'm not around as much anymore due to the fact that the board has been really slow and just...different, but I do love a good discussion.

    Sadly, the board just isn't the same anymore. I miss all the discussions we used to have.

  • I think what annoys me most about those who are against it are the ones that take a "failure is imminent" attitude towards the whole thing. OK, so this bill isn't perfect, so give us an alternative. Don't just say this new plan is a terrible idea and continue to believe that what is in place is working. It isn't.

    I talked to a friend today about it. I knew exactly what she was going to say, but I couldn't help myself asking anyway. To her the whole thing is ridiculous and there was nothing wrong with the system we had in place.

    Also, I think in general it is the American way to be resistant to change, so something this big was never going to go over well.

  • imageshoeaholic0403:

    I think what annoys me most about those who are against it are the ones that take a "failure is imminent" attitude towards the whole thing. OK, so this bill isn't perfect, so give us an alternative. Don't just say this new plan is a terrible idea and continue to believe that what is in place is working. It isn't.

    Also, I think in general it is the American way to be resistant to change, so something this big was never going to go over well.

    What is your (and OPs, chime in too!) opinion on the whole "big government" argument?  I've heard this a lot from those against, and while I can see where they're coming from, do people in European countries or Canada see their universal healthcare as "big government"?  I haven't heard them complain about their gov'ts involvement in their healthcare...

    And with your last statement, I think you hit the nail on the head.  While I'm not overly thrilled with the bill, being that we don't know what kind of fallout there's going to be in the future, something had to be done and that something had to start somewhere.  Change is never easy, no matter how small or big it is.

    Baby Charchie born 12/22/2011
  • I may have a different opinion than other people because I have to run the healthcare plan. It's adding legislation to an already heavily-legislated area. The tax credits aren't enough to offset the penalties and added costs that will exist for employers. So many employers can barely afford to provide healthcare as is that this puts them in a no-win situation. Today, health insurance is the second highest cost of my employees (salary is first). I can foresee having to offer a lesser quality plan that has reduced or limited coverages just to be able to afford to provide health insurance.

    I've been in the boat of having to buy my own coverage so I am highly cognizant of that side. However, I also see it from the HR side and am very concerned.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic Baby Girl P - 11/15/10
  • imageuncharch7:
    What is your (and OPs, chime in too!) opinion on the whole "big government" argument?  I've heard this a lot from those against, and while I can see where they're coming from, do people in European countries or Canada see their universal healthcare as "big government"?  I haven't heard them complain about their gov'ts involvement in their healthcare...

    Well one of the things my friend said this morning when she was bashing the new bill was "We're just going to turn into Canada!" I admit I rolled my eyes at her.

    Like you, I haven't heard anyone from countries with governmental healthcare complaining. I don't think we need to make our plan a carbon copy of theirs. We need to find what works for the US, but at the same time it doesn't scare me like it seems to do with people who are completely opposed to the bill.

    I'm not generally a "damn the man" kind of person though. I don't always agree with government intervention, but in this case I think health care has gotten out of control. Having Big Brother step in isn't necessarily a bad thing IMO. 

    I've been reading the slide show you posted and one of the things that jumped out at me is this:

     "Although conservatives like to say that Obamacare represents government takeover of health care, it mostly pushes people into private insurance plans."

     That's the general idea I've been getting from most of the information I've read so far. I don't see how making private insurance more attainable is a bad thing. I know that isn't the only thing the bill does, but to me this is a big positive.

    PS. I love the word "Obamacare" It makes me giggle. 

  • I'm against it because there are too many other issues that need addressing first.  Medicaid anyone?  I think they should have taken the time to fix a gov't run healthcare plan that's already in place.  Right now it's in shambles.  I don't see how introducing a new more widespread plan is a good idea.

    My current insurance situation sucks.  Yes I have coverage.  It costs an arm and a leg and has outrageous deductibles.  Is it better than none? Not really.  If anything catastrophic happened we'd still be bankrupted.  All that said, I'm still against the new plan.

    Further, I hear plenty of people complain about Canada's Universal health care.

    I'm not adamantly opposed to a health care reform.  What I am against is not fixing what already desperately needs to be fixed.  Right now they are just creating more problems that will need fixing (read: need money).  Who's paying for it?  We're already a Go-Zillion dollars in debt as a nation.

  • Charch, thanks for that article. I hadn't clicked on this post b/c I hadn't had a chance to read much with regard to the reform and that provided a nice overview. I have a really hard time forming much of an opinion on anything bill-related b/c it's hard to anticipate all the different ways it will affect everyone since many who speculate on it seem to have different opinions. I am super happy they are putting an end to the cap of lifetime benefit amounts and to pre-existing conditions.  As for everything else, I'm just happy they are doing something - it's ridiculous how long the status quo has been pushed along.  Even if some parts of the bill negatively affect me (cost wise), I know that realisitcally I can afford it a lot more than many.  Not that I want to afford it, but I can. I'm just glad they are getting some momentum going away from how it is now.

  • imagetracey4228:

    I've been in the boat of having to buy my own coverage so I am highly cognizant of that side. However, I also see it from the HR side and am very concerned.

    See, I used to think I could relate to the buying your own insurance side of things b/c DH was unemployed for a year so we faced that. And I thought it was expensive at $175/month for comprehensive coverage. But boy did I feel like anass when I mentioned DH's healthcare costs to his cousin. Her husband, at the age of 25, has had cancer twice. His second bout with cancer came just after he aged out of his dad's medical plan and went on a student plan while he was in grad school. They are thousands of dollars in medical debt and have to pay $800/month for him to be insured since he hasn't had any luck on the job market since finishing grad school last summer. How could people in this situation possibly find a way to stand on their own two feet? I just think the majority of people who think they see it from the side of those who are paying out of pocket don't realize how deep insurance requires some people's pockets to be.
  • Tracy, I realize how my post may have come off...I didn't mean it to sound like you don't know what you're talking about insurance-wise and don't realize how expensive it can be for some, I'm sure you do. I just don't think it's fair how expensive health insurance can be for some and am glad the legislation is doing things to help them out, even if it means that I'm having to bear some of the load myself.
  • I disagree with it on several different levels!  Do I think it's unfair for people w/ pre-existing conditions to be denied insurance?  Yes!  Do I think it's unfair for the elderly to be without insurance?  Yes!  Do I think it is extremely sad for children with illnesses to be without insurance?  Yes! 

    Now that we have established I am not a cruel, heartless "meanie", we can move on.  

    1. How in the heck can a vote be taken on a plan that is over 2,000 pages that was published, what....maybe 3 days before the actual vote?  We aren't talking about reading "the cat and the hat" people.  Take a look at the bill ladies.  A lot of the wording can be left to a matter of interpretation!  Really?  Do we want our representatives to sign something that is left for interpretation??!  If the motives behind this bill were "for the people", then why rush it? 

    2.  Medicaid...a government run program that is bankrupt!  Why wouldn't they attempt to fix that? 

    3. Why not have a "test market" first.  See how that went.  If it was a success then implement it to the whole country. 

    4. There are plenty of people in Canada complaining about their health care.  Unfortunately, our media doesn't want to cover that story.  Is it not strange that Canadians, who get free health care, come to the U.S. to fulfill their medical needs?!  (If you didn't know this happens, it does!) Meaning, they have to pay out of pocket expenses.  Obviously something is wrong with their health care.    

    I could go on but I'm sure you are tired of reading by now....


    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I agree that we need universal health care. Parts of the bill I like, but others I don't. I'm glad that pre-existing conditions won't keep people from getting health care.

    What about tort reform??? Some of the reason medical care is so expensive is that doctors practice defensive medicine. What about fixing medicare and medicaid abuse (and I see it every day). My current situation in the ER will be worse. The "it's free for me" attitude of medicaid patients who take an ambulance for a toothache will get worse.  I will get paid less per patient, but will get paid for every patient (now I don't get paid for 30% of the work I do, which I'm ok with), so ER docs should come out ok. Other specialties are worried about decreased reimbursement (yet still having very expensive malpractice) and many will leave the medical field.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagewithoutshoes:

    3. Why not have a "test market" first.  See how that went.  If it was a success then implement it to the whole country. 

    I can see where you are coming from here, but this would be a logistical nightmare. 

    How many test markets would they have to have to get an accurate reading on the whole country? I'm not sure a test market approach is rational or even feasible. 

  • imagewithoutshoes:

    1. How in the heck can a vote be taken on a plan that is over 2,000 pages that was published, what....maybe 3 days before the actual vote?  We aren't talking about reading "the cat and the hat" people.  Take a look at the bill ladies.  A lot of the wording can be left to a matter of interpretation!  Really?  Do we want our representatives to sign something that is left for interpretation??!  If the motives behind this bill were "for the people", then why rush it?  On the flip side, can't this be said about a lot of bills?  Wording is always subject to interpretation, there's no solution to this.  I do agree it was rushed.

    2.  Medicaid...a government run program that is bankrupt!  Why wouldn't they attempt to fix that?  Agreed, but this program has issues on the state and national levels.  I know several people throw this program in when talking about HCR, but being that it affects a much smaller percentage of people and has a very different setup I don't think it's a fair comparison.  This administration has talked about overall healthcare reform since the beginning; while I definitely agree that Medicaid/care need reform, I think the big picture needs reform as well.

    3. Why not have a "test market" first.  See how that went.  If it was a success then implement it to the whole country.  How would you do this since it involves tax money, fines for uninsured, etc?  In theory I think it's a good idea... for the private sector.  Not public.

    4. There are plenty of people in Canada complaining about their health care.  Unfortunately, our media doesn't want to cover that story.  Is it not strange that Canadians, who get free health care, come to the U.S. to fulfill their medical needs?!  (If you didn't know this happens, it does!) Meaning, they have to pay out of pocket expenses.  Obviously something is wrong with their health care.   No one is going to be totally happy with all of their care.  I'm just speaking based on debates I've both seen and participated in on a few nat'l boards where Canadians have gladly chimed in.  IMO there's little difference between them coming here for care and US citizens going across the border to get meds, which happens all the time. 

    I could go on but I'm sure you are tired of reading by now....


    I find it especially interesting though that this bill is coming at a time when the economy is still close to or at the bottom.  In the long run, if I am paying a more in tax money, I have (presumably) guaranteed access to health care, and I know that in the future if I have cancer, MS, or any other major, potentially debilitating disease that I will not be turned away because I've reached my lifetime maximums.

    Maybe I'm in the minority, but having more expensive health care costs like I do right now makes me think twice about going to see a doctor.  Preventative care is a different story for me personally, but spending $25 on a co-pay to go get a Rx (say, $10) for a minor illness is very different than walking out with a $175 bill and a $30 medication like I did when I had no choice but to go in August.  With a rise in self-insured and the issues that it raises, change has got to start somewhere.

     

    Baby Charchie born 12/22/2011
  • imageterpbrideinnc:
    Tracy, I realize how my post may have come off...I didn't mean it to sound like you don't know what you're talking about insurance-wise and don't realize how expensive it can be for some, I'm sure you do. I just don't think it's fair how expensive health insurance can be for some and am glad the legislation is doing things to help them out, even if it means that I'm having to bear some of the load myself.

    At the same time, though....to me, $800 a month seems like a bargain when the insurance company is/was/hopefully-never-again paying 3-4 times that much in medical expenses.  I mean, unfortunately life isn't always "fair." 

    I know the frustration that you all experience from those from differing viewpoints on this opinion.  I hear it too and I roll my eyes the same way.  Those who just spout out whatever the pundits tell us--almost word for word, right??  It happens on both sides of the coin. 

    The main reason why I am against is is purely Constitutional, though.  Where in the Constitution is Health Care designated as a job of Congress?  To me, it's just another power grab for the Democrats to throw out the essence of the Constitution.  In fact, it just seems like the Congress has forgotten all about States Rights ie "those powers not given the Congress here are designated to the states."  What the link Charch posted didn't bring up was the fact that Massachusetts health plan has also brought to light the actual immense expense of the plan.  This is only one state--and the reviews on the plan have actually been tremendously mixed.  Why not encourage other states to try and take on this immense burden first, see how it goes and THEN see if we need the Feds to do anything?  As Speed mentioned, it's not like the programs they are currently overseeing are stellar by any means....

    And what saddens me is that peoples first reaction is "what is the government going to do about this?"  Well, why does the government have to take care of everything?  Or why does it always have to be the Federal government?  We have local(city) government, we have state representatives.  Why aren't those of you who want some sort of government program asking your local guys that theoretically lives in your area for the help you need?  Do you not trust them or believe they can help?  Why would the Federal government be any better then?? 

  • healthcare reform tool

    an interesting tool.

    Baby Charchie born 12/22/2011
  • imageuncharch7:

    I find it especially interesting though that this bill is coming at a time when the economy is still close to or at the bottom.  In the long run, if I am paying a more in tax money, I have (presumably) guaranteed access to health care, and I know that in the future if I have cancer, MS, or any other major, potentially debilitating disease that I will not be turned away because I've reached my lifetime maximums.

    Maybe I'm in the minority, but having more expensive health care costs like I do right now makes me think twice about going to see a doctor.  Preventative care is a different story for me personally, but spending $25 on a co-pay to go get a Rx (say, $10) for a minor illness is very different than walking out with a $175 bill and a $30 medication like I did when I had no choice but to go in August.  With a rise in self-insured and the issues that it raises, change has got to start somewhere.

     

    A lot of what you said here is exactly why I'm mostly happy about the bill. I've said I don't think it's perfect, but it's a start.

    A year ago insurance wasn't much of an issue for me. I didn't give a lot of consideration to my future health. I was healthy and I always had been. I don't even remember the last time I had the flu.

    Then my car crash happened and I'm always going to have those injuries looming over my head. And if health care stays the way it is I'll be refused treatment for possible future complications caused by something completely out of my control.

    I realize they have to take that into consideration when we start to negotiate a settlement, but I'm not so naive as to think that whatever I do get out of it is going to be able to cover my care for the rest of my life.

    Knowing I can't be refused coverage for a pre-existing condition is a big weight off my shoulders. 

  • imagederky17:

    And what saddens me is that peoples first reaction is "what is the government going to do about this?"  Well, why does the government have to take care of everything?  Or why does it always have to be the Federal government?  We have local(city) government, we have state representatives.  Why aren't those of you who want some sort of government program asking your local guys that theoretically lives in your area for the help you need?  Do you not trust them or believe they can help?  Why would the Federal government be any better then?? 

    This is somewhat related and mostly unrelated, but the last two times I wrote to my local reps about two separate topics I got generic, totally unrelated responses back.  It was entertaining and frustrating at the same time.  I'm sure I'm not the only one in this boat, which can easily lead to a lack of trust and a group of people that think that their time is just wasted when they do write to their reps.
    Baby Charchie born 12/22/2011
  • imageuncharch7:
    imagederky17:

    And what saddens me is that peoples first reaction is "what is the government going to do about this?"  Well, why does the government have to take care of everything?  Or why does it always have to be the Federal government?  We have local(city) government, we have state representatives.  Why aren't those of you who want some sort of government program asking your local guys that theoretically lives in your area for the help you need?  Do you not trust them or believe they can help?  Why would the Federal government be any better then?? 

    This is somewhat related and mostly unrelated, but the last two times I wrote to my local reps about two separate topics I got generic, totally unrelated responses back.  It was entertaining and frustrating at the same time.  I'm sure I'm not the only one in this boat, which can easily lead to a lack of trust and a group of people that think that their time is just wasted when they do write to their reps.

    Huh, funny, that's the same kind of response I received from Senator Kay Hagan!  I wrote to her regarding farming techniques (asking her to support small farmers and to oppose genetically modified crops) and somehow got a response about her Health Care Reform stance.  Actually, somehow I'm on her email list now.  :)  So, you can see that I really do try to get my information from all sides.

  • imagederky17:

    imageterpbrideinnc:
    Tracy, I realize how my post may have come off...I didn't mean it to sound like you don't know what you're talking about insurance-wise and don't realize how expensive it can be for some, I'm sure you do. I just don't think it's fair how expensive health insurance can be for some and am glad the legislation is doing things to help them out, even if it means that I'm having to bear some of the load myself.

    At the same time, though....to me, $800 a month seems like a bargain when the insurance company is/was/hopefully-never-again paying 3-4 times that much in medical expenses.  I mean, unfortunately life isn't always "fair." 

    To put this into perspective in the state of NC:

    Let's say said person got laid off.  They're single.  COBRA expires.  They still can't find a job.

    The max UI benefit is $494 at the moment.  Said person isn't working at all, they don't have a PT job.

    We'll round numbers to make things easy.

    4 weeks of UI=$2000

    Said person attempting to be financially responsible and is having taxes taken out, totaling 10%=$200

    We're down to $1800, $800 of which is eaten up by health insurance premiums, not including any sort of co-pays for medications.

    They live in an apartment, which costs $500.

    We're down to $500 for food, gas, utilities, phone, car insurance, the list goes on.

    And then we wonder why that person can't get ahead.  While some people fall into financial difficulty through poor decisions, others fall into it by no fault of their own.  Life isn't fair, we all know that, but to me this goes beyond that.  Gov't assistance has such a negative stigma in this country, but if they're going to help subsidize some of the premiums, is that really such a bad thing?  Either it's the overall absorption of cost by country or it's the ripple effect that this person has on a local, state and federal level.  Neither is desirable, but I'll take the overall absorption of cost.

    Baby Charchie born 12/22/2011
  • imagederky17:

    imageterpbrideinnc:
    Tracy, I realize how my post may have come off...I didn't mean it to sound like you don't know what you're talking about insurance-wise and don't realize how expensive it can be for some, I'm sure you do. I just don't think it's fair how expensive health insurance can be for some and am glad the legislation is doing things to help them out, even if it means that I'm having to bear some of the load myself.

    At the same time, though....to me, $800 a month seems like a bargain when the insurance company is/was/hopefully-never-again paying 3-4 times that much in medical expenses.  I mean, unfortunately life isn't always "fair." 

    Derky, I usually love you but Confused

    I know the frustration that you all experience from those from differing viewpoints on this opinion.  I hear it too and I roll my eyes the same way.  Those who just spout out whatever the pundits tell us--almost word for word, right??  It happens on both sides of the coin.

    The main reason why I am against is is purely Constitutional, though.  Where in the Constitution is Health Care designated as a job of Congress? I feel like this is the same as saying Christians should live word for word by the Bible. (I'm not trying to start a religious debate, I'm just making a comparison.) Do we not agree that the Bible is a good "rule of thumb" measurement for life & not a hard and fast rule. I feel like the Constitution is the same. Things were a lot different when it was written. How would the founding fathers have known to put in a clause about national vs state vs private healthcare 230+ years later? To me, it's just another power grab for the Democrats to throw out the essence of the Constitution.  In fact, it just seems like the Congress has forgotten all about States Rights ie "those powers not given the Congress here are designated to the states."  What the link Charch posted didn't bring up was the fact that Massachusetts health plan has also brought to light the actual immense expense of the plan.  This is only one state--and the reviews on the plan have actually been tremendously mixed.  Why not encourage other states to try and take on this immense burden first, see how it goes and THEN see if we need the Feds to do anything? "Encourage" is the same thing as "suggest." Parents encourage children to be kind to others, but that doesn't mean the kids won't completely ignore them. What happens if some states do it and some don't bother? People getting sh!t on now will still be getting sh!t on then.  As Speed mentioned, it's not like the programs they are currently overseeing are stellar by any means.... I agree with Speed that the current national health care plans aren't great or even good. I also think that can be said about a lot of things our government runs. But I think they've been going around in circles with healthcare for years and, even if it's flawed, it's good to see something happening.

    And what saddens me is that peoples first reaction is "what is the government going to do about this?"  Well, why does the government have to take care of everythingIsn't that what you were saying when you said self insured people should get a tax write off? Not that I disagree with that, but that would still be a government decision. It isn't on the same scale as this bill, but it's still government involvement. Or why does it always have to be the Federal government?  We have local(city) government, we have state representatives.  Why aren't those of you who want some sort of government program asking your local guys that theoretically lives in your area for the help you need?  Do you not trust them or believe they can help?  Why would the Federal government be any better then?? Now here I agree with you. My friend, the same one that doesn't like this bill, is always telling me about letters she has written to her local and state government. We don't see eye to eye on a lot of political matters, but here I think she has a point. I don't think they pay a lot of attention to her letters, but I think if more of us did things like that on a regular basis local and state governments would be forced to pay attention.

    I think this, like so many other political issues, is an us v/s them thing. Dem vs Rep and Insured vs Un/under insured.  This is where I get all kumbaya on you, but I think it would be resolved more quickly if there could be some agreement that "I" is going to have to take a hit in order for "we" to benefit.

  • Shoe and Charch...I totally see your points.  And yes, they are good, valid ones.  Those are all reasons why I'm not flaming mad, I'm not whining, I just inherently disagree with the direction our government is going.  I'll support candidates opposed to these ideas, I'll write my letter and make my voice (hopefully) be heard in opposition, but at the end of the day, I'll thank the lucky stars that I do have the good fortune to pay my taxes and pay my dues to society. 

     

     

  • imageterpbrideinnc:

    I am super happy they are putting an end to the cap of lifetime benefit amounts and to pre-existing conditions.  As for everything else, I'm just happy they are doing something - it's ridiculous how long the status quo has been pushed along.  Even if some parts of the bill negatively affect me (cost wise), I know that realisitcally I can afford it a lot more than many.  Not that I want to afford it, but I can. I'm just glad they are getting some momentum going away from how it is now.

    I basically agree with what Terp said here. 

    imageimage
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagewithoutshoes:

     

    4. There are plenty of people in Canada complaining about their health care.  Unfortunately, our media doesn't want to cover that story.  Is it not strange that Canadians, who get free health care, come to the U.S. to fulfill their medical needs?!  (If you didn't know this happens, it does!) Meaning, they have to pay out of pocket expenses.  Obviously something is wrong with their health care.      

    I really don't get this argument. I have family in Canada and I don't hear them complaining about their healthcare system. Is it a perfect system? No. Is ours a perfect system? No. If Canada's system is so awful then why do Americans go to Canada to buy prescription drugs? Or go to down to South America to get cheaper surgeries. Our system is broken and we need to fix it. Our healthcare system actually ranks much lower than other less developed countries. I can't remember the link (it was on the P&CE board a little while ago), but the World Health Organization published a list of countries with the best health care systems and were were not at the top.

    As for big government getting involved in our healthcare system, why shouldn't they? We've let big business run healthcare for a long time now and looks where it's gotten us. Those with pre-existing conditions are denied coverage, people who can't afford decent healthcare can't get the best treatments available, and about half of all bankruptcies in the US are the result of medical debt. If we can make healthcare more affordable and accessible for all Americans we'll have a much healthier and productive country.   

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards