Minneapolis/St. Paul Nesties
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

it's becoming embarrassing to be a Minnesotan.

between the amendment vote passing and Michele Bachmann...I don't know if I can't take anymore. 

 

 

Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
«1

Re: it's becoming embarrassing to be a Minnesotan.

  • Ugh. Seriously.  I was at the capitol last night when they took the vote, and several of the DFLers that were coming out of the chamber were in tears.  And of course when Kriesel and the other GOPers that voted against the amendment came out, they got TONS of applause.  I am disappointed that 2 DFLers chose politics over principle and voted in favor. All in all I am just so sad and frustrated with where MN is heading. I hope that this fires people up and we can put a stop to this nonsense in 2012.
    Lots of love and continual explosions of babydust to my BG Besties! XOXOXOXO
    image
    2.3.11: Started TTC
    2.8.12:Initial b/w - Normal
    3.7.12:HSG - Normal
    3.8.12:S/A - Normal
    Cycle #12/Month #15 - 50mg.Clomid CD5-CD9 - BFN
    4.24.12: RE appointment - DX Unexplained IF
    7.12 - 9.12: TTA
    10.12 - 1.13: TTC Naturally
    February 2013 - IUI #1 w/100 mg Clomid - 5 mil.post-wash: BFFN
    March 2013 - IUI #2 w/100 mg Clomid & Trigger - ?? MY BLOG
  • it feels like we're moving backwards
  • Pawlenty is running for president too.  lordy pete.

     

  • Well, I know where I will be directing my political efforts next year. So much to work for--defeating the amendment and reelecting Obama. As for Pawlenty, that doesn't bother me so much. I wouldn't vote for him, but he's a serious, thoughtful politician, and he's not embarrassing to Minnesota like Bachmann or a lunatic like Palin.
  • imagethedutchgirl:
    Well, I know where I will be directing my political efforts next year. So much to work for--defeating the amendment and reelecting Obama. As for Pawlenty, that doesn't bother me so much. I wouldn't vote for him, but he's a serious, thoughtful politician, and he's not embarrassing to Minnesota like Bachmann or a lunatic like Palin.

    Well said. 

    The Twins are mighty embarrassing these days too. 

  • Seriously!!  There's a lot I'm questioning about our state at the moment...
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • The thing that gets me is the GOP claim "We just want to let the people decide."  But they forget about a little principle called: "do we believe it's a good use of our states sacred constitution to ADD discrimination, hate, and TAKE AWAY rights?"

    Our politicians have basically said yes, our constitution is worth defiling with hate and discrimination that goes against other core laws we have that do not allow discrimination based on sexual orientation.

    I asked a friend of mine about what she's had to go through and she said it cost them $7,000 in various fees to get their life set up the way it is today.  And even at THAT insane cost they are still so legally vulnerable.  And she said another friend of hers is in a nasty, horrid fight for custody and none of it would exist if her friend was legally married.  Instead each woman is claiming "the kids were my eggs" vs "I birthed the babies."  So, so, so sad.

  • imageElizabethD:

    The thing that gets me is the GOP claim "We just want to let the people decide."  But they forget about a little principle called: "do we believe it's a good use of our states sacred constitution to ADD discrimination, hate, and TAKE AWAY rights?"

    Our politicians have basically said yes, our constitution is worth defiling with hate and discrimination that goes against other core laws we have that do not allow discrimination based on sexual orientation.

    I asked a friend of mine about what she's had to go through and she said it cost them $7,000 in various fees to get their life set up the way it is today.  And even at THAT insane cost they are still so legally vulnerable.  And she said another friend of hers is in a nasty, horrid fight for custody and none of it would exist if her friend was legally married.  Instead each woman is claiming "the kids were my eggs" vs "I birthed the babies."  So, so, so sad.

    the part that bothers me most is that the people who want this amendment also speak about "smaller government" and wanting the government "out of my life". What, the government should only stay out of YOUR life, but they can feel free to meddle in everyone else's?  

    There's also the issue of the 2nd amendment...I've yet to hear one logical argument that is not based on God or the Bible, and they fail to understand that those can not be the basis for law!

     

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageMrsGo4Hockeychick:

    There's also the issue of the 2nd amendment...I've yet to hear one logical argument that is not based on God or the Bible, and they fail to understand that those can not be the basis for law!

     

    You mean first amendment, right? I don't think there's a bible-based argument for or against guns...

  • imageStrawberryBlondie:
    imageMrsGo4Hockeychick:

    There's also the issue of the 2nd amendment...I've yet to hear one logical argument that is not based on God or the Bible, and they fail to understand that those can not be the basis for law!

     

    You mean first amendment, right? I don't think there's a bible-based argument for or against guns...

    you're right. pregnant brain fart/fat fingers as I was heading to the basement with the toddler. LOL.  

     

    I'm also curious. If the single tornado last year was a direct sign from God that the ELCA had made a huge mistake in allowing openly gay ministers...what does the fact that there's a huge multiple tornado producing storm going through after the amendment vote was approved mean? ;)

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageMrsGo4Hockeychick:


    I'm also curious. If the single tornado last year was a direct sign from God that the ELCA had made a huge mistake in allowing openly gay ministers...what does the fact that there's a huge multiple tornado producing storm going through after the amendment vote was approved mean? ;)

    I totally forgot about that. That's funny.  

  • The thing about "letting the people" decide is that it generally doesn't work in civil rights issues.  Look at the 1964 civil rights act.  The majority of the population at that time would NOT have passed that legislation.  Sometimes the representatives have to do what is RIGHT, not what is popular.  The modern GOP, or at least some of it, doesn't get that.
  • imagethedutchgirl:
    The thing about "letting the people" decide is that it generally doesn't work in civil rights issues.  Look at the 1964 civil rights act.  The majority of the population at that time would NOT have passed that legislation.  Sometimes the representatives have to do what is RIGHT, not what is popular.  The modern GOP, or at least some of it, doesn't get that.

    I completely agree.

    I heard someone try to argue the other day that because there are tax implications that go along with marriage, it's entirely appropriate for it to be on the ballot. I still can't figure that logic out.

  • After that opening prayer stunt this week, I am now completely baffled by the MN GOP.
    image
    Lilypie Premature Baby tickers

    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • the problem with letting the "people" decide is that the "people" often vote with fear instead of morality.   250 years ago, the majority of the folks in this country had no problem with slavery, did not consider blacks to be humans, women and children were considered property, and many believe that it was their God given rights to exterminate the Native Americans and take their land. 

  • imagethedutchgirl:
    The thing about "letting the people" decide is that it generally doesn't work in civil rights issues.  Look at the 1964 civil rights act.  The majority of the population at that time would NOT have passed that legislation.  Sometimes the representatives have to do what is RIGHT, not what is popular.  The modern GOP, or at least some of it, doesn't get that.

    agreed. and I have at least 3 people on my FB list that are in interracial marriages and will not see the irony in the fact that they are THRILLED they get to vote to deny marriage to gay couples. Yet, had people been allowed to vote on their marriages, it wouldn't have been allowed either.  

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageMrsGo4Hockeychick:

    imagethedutchgirl:
    The thing about "letting the people" decide is that it generally doesn't work in civil rights issues.  Look at the 1964 civil rights act.  The majority of the population at that time would NOT have passed that legislation.  Sometimes the representatives have to do what is RIGHT, not what is popular.  The modern GOP, or at least some of it, doesn't get that.

    agreed. and I have at least 3 people on my FB list that are in interracial marriages and will not see the irony in the fact that they are THRILLED they get to vote to deny marriage to gay couples. Yet, had people been allowed to vote on their marriages, it wouldn't have been allowed either.  

    That's been one of my points all along.  H is black; I'm white. 45 years ago, our marriage would not have been legal in all states.  Looking at that now, it's insanity.  I'm embarrassed by this as a Minnesotan. I can only hope everyone else who feels this way will get out and vote in 2012.  

  • imageMAYA3300:
    it feels like we're moving backwards

    I feel this way too. I know where my political contributions are going for 2012.

    I may even get yard signs (I never get yard signs).

     

    image Oops, I got into Dad's hair goop. At least I gotta mohawk! My Blog Updated: March 2012 Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageMrsGo4Hockeychick:
    the part that bothers me most is that the people who want this amendment also speak about "smaller government" and wanting the government "out of my life". What, the government should only stay out of YOUR life, but they can feel free to meddle in everyone else's?  

     

    THIS!  You want government in your life less, yet you decide that this amendment is necessary?  It drives me insane to hear the GOP talk about these two things in one interview and not see the irony in it.

    image
  • It is embarrassing to be a Minnesotan.  I sent an email to my rep last week saying as much.

    imageMichellePete:
    imageMrsGo4Hockeychick:
    the part that bothers me most is that the people who want this amendment also speak about "smaller government" and wanting the government "out of my life". What, the government should only stay out of YOUR life, but they can feel free to meddle in everyone else's?  

    THIS!  You want government in your life less, yet you decide that this amendment is necessary?  It drives me insane to hear the GOP talk about these two things in one interview and not see the irony in it.

    Agreed.  I wish one of them would explain how they resolve the contradiction that doesn't involve the bible.  Oh wait, they can't. 

    Am I the only one who thinks part of their push for this was to distract voters from the real issue - that they can't figure out how to compromise and come to an agreement on the budget?


    image
    Tired after a long morning of hiking and swimming.
  • I keep trying to type responses but I get so upset that my words get stuck and won't come out.  This is so sad, frustrating, demoralizing, heartbreaking...on and on.

    A friend posted an e-mail on Twitter yesterday that someone had sent to Representative Tony Cornish.  It was an eloquently written well thought out e-mail urging Tony to vote no.  

    His response?  "Give it a rest!"

    NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICE.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Oh FFS!  Is Michelle Bachmann actually running for president?  Good lord.  Maybe the apocalypse HAS occurred....

     

    And yes, I'm totally embarrased for our state right now.  Ugh.  Its so bad.

  • I pretty much ride the fence when it comes to political affiliation. I consider myself fiscally conservative but socially liberal, and I have voted for both GOP and DFL (and independent) candidates in the past.

    The gay marriage ban thing is probably going to push me over the fence to the DFL side permanently. I hate the idea of higher taxes, etc. that will come with a DFL-run state, but I'm just so incredibly angry about the gay marriage issue that I can't support any of the GOP legislators who voted for the constitutional amendment. I personally believe gay marriages should be legal for so many reasons, but even for those people who don't think gay marriage is okay, I don't understand the need this constitutional amendment? The state of MN already has a law saying that a marriage must be between one man and one woman. The anti-gay-marriage people are already getting their way, even without this amendment!

    There are so many other more pressing issues our government should be focusing on right now, I can't believe they're putting so much time/effort into the gay marriage ban. Why don't we concentrate on adding jobs or fixing health care or something more worthwhile?

    image
    Mr. Sammy Dog
  • imagesjb&apa:
    I personally believe gay marriages should be legal for so many reasons, but even for those people who don't think gay marriage is okay, I don't understand the need this constitutional amendment? The state of MN already has a law saying that a marriage must be between one man and one woman. The anti-gay-marriage people are already getting their way, even without this amendment!

    There are so many other more pressing issues our government should be focusing on right now, I can't believe they're putting so much time/effort into the gay marriage ban. Why don't we concentrate on adding jobs or fixing health care or something more worthwhile?

    Exactly!!  They already have their wish granted....why the need to push it any more???????  

    I agree with you completely.  Let's focus on things that actually are issues!!!!!!

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageMrsKizdoodle:
    imagesjb&apa:
    I personally believe gay marriages should be legal for so many reasons, but even for those people who don't think gay marriage is okay, I don't understand the need this constitutional amendment? The state of MN already has a law saying that a marriage must be between one man and one woman. The anti-gay-marriage people are already getting their way, even without this amendment!

    There are so many other more pressing issues our government should be focusing on right now, I can't believe they're putting so much time/effort into the gay marriage ban. Why don't we concentrate on adding jobs or fixing health care or something more worthwhile?

    Exactly!!  They already have their wish granted....why the need to push it any more???????  

    I agree with you completely.  Let's focus on things that actually are issues!!!!!!

    I think they pushed the marriage issue because they want to divert voters from the issues on which they haven't lived up to their promises.  It's perfect, really.  They know they haven't been able to make significant steps towards improving the economy.  They also know time is ticking for the election and our chance to vote them out.  The marriage amendment will give them stronger support from the anti-gay people.  Sure some republican and moderate voters will sway to the other side because they're angry about the amendment, but there are bound to be a good number that will fall for the argument that it's not the GOP'ers fault that nothing was accomplished because the democrats wouldn't work with them on the budget/economy/jobs. 

    image
    Tired after a long morning of hiking and swimming.
  • imagejennyk213:

    I think they pushed the marriage issue because they want to divert voters from the issues on which they haven't lived up to their promises.  It's perfect, really.  They know they haven't been able to make significant steps towards improving the economy.  They also know time is ticking for the election and our chance to vote them out.  The marriage amendment will give them stronger support from the anti-gay people.  Sure some republican and moderate voters will sway to the other side because they're angry about the amendment, but there are bound to be a good number that will fall for the argument that it's not the GOP'ers fault that nothing was accomplished because the democrats wouldn't work with them on the budget/economy/jobs. 

    That all makes my head hurt.  Politics these days is all trickery and smoke & mirrors it seems.  :-(  

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagemeesa31:

    Oh FFS!  Is Michelle Bachmann actually running for president?  Good lord.  Maybe the apocalypse HAS occurred....

     

    And yes, I'm totally embarrased for our state right now.  Ugh.  Its so bad.

    well, whether she actually runs or not is a moot point...she's an embarrassment just being a US Representative.

     

    Oh, and I am trying to sit on my hands on a friend's FB status right now (because I REALLY don't have it in me to start sh!t today). She's one of the ones that's THRILLED she gets to vote to deny people the right to wed, but today she's celebrating 8 wonderful years of marriage with her husband. Who is not white, like she is. And yet, even if I pointed out that she's lucky they decided to NOT let the "people decide" in 1967, she still wouldn't see the irony in the fact that she can't wait to make that decision for others.  

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageMrsKizdoodle:
    imagesjb&apa:
    I personally believe gay marriages should be legal for so many reasons, but even for those people who don't think gay marriage is okay, I don't understand the need this constitutional amendment? The state of MN already has a law saying that a marriage must be between one man and one woman. The anti-gay-marriage people are already getting their way, even without this amendment!

    There are so many other more pressing issues our government should be focusing on right now, I can't believe they're putting so much time/effort into the gay marriage ban. Why don't we concentrate on adding jobs or fixing health care or something more worthwhile?

    Exactly!!  They already have their wish granted....why the need to push it any more???????  

    Laws can be declared unconstitutional in the courts. Constitutional amendments can't.

    I think it's absolutely ridiculous that they'd even think it's a good idea to write discrimination into the constitiution, and I think it's just a distraction from the fact that they can't agree on a budget, but I get why they want the amendment rather than just rely on existing law. 

  • imageStrawberryBlondie:
    imageMrsKizdoodle:
    imagesjb&apa:
    I personally believe gay marriages should be legal for so many reasons, but even for those people who don't think gay marriage is okay, I don't understand the need this constitutional amendment? The state of MN already has a law saying that a marriage must be between one man and one woman. The anti-gay-marriage people are already getting their way, even without this amendment!

    There are so many other more pressing issues our government should be focusing on right now, I can't believe they're putting so much time/effort into the gay marriage ban. Why don't we concentrate on adding jobs or fixing health care or something more worthwhile?

    Exactly!!  They already have their wish granted....why the need to push it any more???????  

    Laws can be declared unconstitutional in the courts. Constitutional amendments can't.

    I think it's absolutely ridiculous that they'd even think it's a good idea to write discrimination into the constitiution, and I think it's just a distraction from the fact that they can't agree on a budget, but I get why they want the amendment rather than just rely on existing law. 

    Exactly the bolded part.

    Re: Pawlenty. I don't like him because he's not telling the full truth. Sure - he didn't raise STATE taxes - but because of his inability to raise state revenues, local revenues were raised through property tax increases.

    Although - he's not charasmatic enough to win, IMO. Anyone see his Iowa speech today? The clips I saw - no charm or state presence at all.

    I might also consider a lawn sign or two. I'm fired up over the marriage amendment!!

    image
    jack | born 9.13.12 at 40w4d | 9 lbs 12 oz | 23 in
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
    imageimage
    my puppy loves - chloe & jenson
    pregnancy blog | chart
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards