Politics & Current Events
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

s/o WonW & girls: The Myth of the Mama's Boy

http://ideas.time.com/2012/03/16/the-myth-of-the-mamas-boy/

 

The Myth of the Mama?s Boy

We never worry about an involved father "masculinizing" his daughter. Why do such fears persist about a feminizing aspect of mothering?
By Kate Stone Lombardi | March 16, 2012 | 72
John Howard /   Getty Images
John Howard / Getty Images
image

Lombardi's book is The Mama's Boy Myth: Why Keeping Our Sons Close Makes Them Stronger.

For generations, mothers have gotten the same old message when it comes to raising sons: beware of keeping him ?too close.? A mom who nurtures a deep emotional bond will prevent him from growing up to be a strong, independent man. By refusing to cut those apron strings, she is on track to create the archetypal, effeminate, maladjusted ?mama?s boy.? There?s one problem with this theory: it?s just not true.

From the Oedipus myth (not to mention the complex Freud created around it) to the movie Psycho, our culture warns us about the dangers of mother-son closeness. No other parent-child combination is so stigmatized. We encourage mothers and daughters, as well as fathers and sons, to stay close throughout their adult lives. And a supportive father is considered essential to a daughter?s self-esteem. A dad can coach his daughter?s lacrosse team, wipe her tears and encourage her loftiest ambitions, all with smiling approval.

(MORE: The Myths of Bullying)

But a mother who is similarly involved in her son?s life is often accused of coddling, meddling, smothering or acting inappropriately. While we don?t worry about an involved father ?masculinizing? his daughter, there is clearly concern about the feminizing influence of Mom. As one woman said to me, ?It?s like if I spend too much time with my son, he?ll start running around, begging for directions.? Mothers of sons are supposed to push their boys away, physically and emotionally, in the name of their developing manhood.

This double standard is misguided and can be deeply damaging to boys. Certainly we know very young boys benefit from their mother?s love and comfort. A study published in Child Development involving almost 6,000 children found that baby boys who do not form strong attachments to their mothers grow up to be more aggressive and destructive children. And when young sons are encouraged to separate prematurely from their mothers, they become anxious little boys who carry a fear of intimacy and betrayal into their adult years, says Dr. Michael Kimmel, a sociologist who has written extensively about masculinity. After all, the first woman they have loved and depended on has pushed them away.

(MORE: ?Childist? Nation: Does America Hate Kids?)

As boys grow older, mothers who stay close to their sons can help combat the worst elements of a culture that cuts off boys? natural sensitivity and rich emotional life. For years, headlines have proclaimed that boys are in ?crisis.? They suffer from being forced to conform to standards of masculinity that still decree the only acceptable emotions are anger and aggression. Boys are also falling behind girls in school, getting lower grades, exhibiting more behavioral problems and receiving more diagnoses of learning disabilities.

These are not unrelated problems, and moms can be part of the solution. Nurturing mothers can help their sons develop emotional intelligence, encouraging them to talk about their feelings and recognize those of others. Certainly boys who are better able to articulate their thoughts and who have stronger self-control will perform better in the classroom than boys who retreat into silence or act out. One study of 400 middle-school boys in New York City public schools revealed that boys who were closer to their mothers were less likely to define masculinity as a matter of being tough, stoic and self-reliant. These boys not only had less anxiety and depression than their more stoic peers but also were getting better grades.

(MORE: How to Unlock Your Child?s Academic Potential)

And contrary to stereotype, boys who can express a broader range of emotions will not become wimps, forever clinging to their mommies, but instead independent guys who will make strong, empathetic spouses and partners, says Dr. William Pollack, a psychology professor at Harvard University. What?s more, these young men will be better equipped to navigate today?s economy, in which communication skills and teamwork are more important for success than brute physical strength or dominance.

Moms are tired of being told to back off from their sons for their own good. By keeping sons close, they aren?t creating mama?s boys. Moms are helping their sons reach their full human potential and setting up their boys for happier, more successful lives.

(MORE: Ten Ideas That Are Changing Your Life)

Lombardi is a journalist and author of The Mama?s Boy Myth: Why Keeping Our Sons Close Makes Them Stronger. The views expressed are solely her own.

Read other related stories about this:


Read more: http://ideas.time.com/2012/03/16/the-myth-of-the-mamas-boy/#ixzz1pcNCeXh1

_____________________________

I love my boy so much, but as the wife of a mama's boy, I feel that there is a big difference between teaching one's son to be emotionally communicative and coddling one's son to the point of adult uselessness. 

Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

Re: s/o WonW & girls: The Myth of the Mama's Boy

  • I'm really glad this article is the 1st time I've heard it suggested that these ideas are real and that people really think them. If someone had suggested any of that crap to me regarding my own sons, I would have kicked them in the teeth.
    image
  • I've always been under the impression that raising a mama's boy had less to do with what happens when he's little, and more to do with not gradually letting go and fostering independence when he gets into his teens.  It's something that grew out of the whole Feminine Mystique, isn't it?
    image
  • I personally would not be attracted to someone who did not have a close relationship with their mother.  I think the whole "mama's boy" theme has less to do with the sons and more to do with mother's who don't let go when appropriate.  This isn't limited to boys though, there are plenty of parents who shelter their children and who don't encourage independence in boys and girls.   
    Lilypie Pregnancy tickers Lilypie Fifth Birthday tickers
  • Hm.

    Like the others, I've never equated "mama's boy" with a son who has a close relationship with his mother but with the mother who doesn't foster a sense of independence in her sons (or daughters. it goes both ways). And I think those women who can't let go of their adult children actually irreparably damage the close relationship they think they're fostering. 

    But I think there are some interesting points that society really does fear the feminizing of boys to a much greater extent than it fears the masculinization of women.  I don't feel like "tomboy" is nearly the stigma that "mama's boy" or "wussy boy" is.

    I think that ties back into the whole concept that we've taught our daughters that they can be as good at anything they want to be, even "traditional" boy things.  But we've not taught our sons the same, or that they can be excellent in roles that aren't traditionally "male", like nursing or child care or being a SAHD.  Instead we stigmatize those men - just go over to TB and ask if they'd put their children in daycare where the provider is a guy.  I think that's a damn shame.

  • Maybe I am showing off my elitestness here but I didn't even know this was a question anymore. With all of this "wear your baby/comfort his/her needs, be everything for them 24/7" style of parenting we having going on, it seems very old fashioned to even consider treating a boy differently than a girl when it comes to affection and support.

    I agree the mama's boy stereotype comes from not letting go when they are older at the appropriate time.

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards