Politics & Current Events
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Marine discharged for anti-Obama FB posts

By ELLIOT SPAGAT, Associated Press 

SAN DIEGO (AP) ? A sergeant will be discharged for criticizing President Barack Obama on Facebook in a case that called into question the Pentagon's policies about social media and its limits on the speech of active duty military personnel, the Marine Corps said Wednesday.

Sgt. Gary Stein will get an other-than-honorable discharge and lose most of his benefits for violating the policies, the Corps said.

The San Diego-area Marine who has served nine years in the Corps said he was disappointed by the decision. He argued that he was exercising his constitutional rights to free speech.

"I love the Marine Corps, I love my job. I wish it wouldn't have gone this way. I'm having a hard time seeing how 15 words on Facebook could have ruined my nine-year career," he told The Associated Press.

Gary Kreep, an attorney for Stein, said he would pursue administrative appeals within the Marine Corps but anticipates the effort will fail. He said he planned to file an amended complaint in federal court.

"As long as he wants to pursue this, we will be supporting him," said Kreep, who is executive director of the United States Justice Foundation, an advocacy group.

The Marines acted after saying Stein stated March 1 on a Facebook page used by Marine meteorologists, "Screw Obama and I will not follow all orders from him." Stein later clarified that statement, saying he would not follow unlawful orders.

Brig. Gen. Daniel Yoo, the commanding general of the Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego, said in a brief statement Wednesday that evidence supported an administrative board's recommendation to discharge Stein.

Tom Umberg, a former Army colonel and military prosecutor, said Stein persisted even after being warned.

"The Marine Corps gave him the opportunity to think about his actions, yet Sgt. Stein continued to undermine the chain of command," said Umberg, who was not involved in Stein's case. "I think his purpose was to leave the Marine Corps in a dramatic fashion in order to begin a career in talk radio or what have you."

Umberg believes the decision to discharge Stein will have limited impact because the vast majority of Marines would never consider such postings.

"I think 99 percent of the soldiers and Marines currently on duty understand the duties of supporting the chain of command and understand their rights of free speech are limited," he said. "To that 1 percent who don't know their rights to free speech are limited once they take the oath, this is a loud and clear message."

During a hearing, a military prosecutor submitted screen grabs of Stein's postings on one Facebook page he created called Armed Forces Tea Party, which the prosecutor said included the image of Obama on a "Jackass" movie poster. Stein also superimposed Obama's image on a poster for "The Incredibles" movie that he changed to "The Horribles," military prosecutor Capt. John Torresala said.

At the hearing this month at Camp Pendleton, Torresala argued that Stein's behavior repeatedly violated Pentagon policy and he should be dismissed after ignoring warnings from his superiors about his postings.

The military has had a policy since the Civil War limiting the free speech of service members, including criticism of the commander in chief.

Pentagon directives say military personnel in uniform cannot sponsor a political club; participate in any TV or radio program or group discussion that advocates for or against a political party, candidate or cause; or speak at any event promoting a political movement.

Commissioned officers also may not use contemptuous words against senior officials.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gUKg97nw4_NReX3L4KX-zDOhg7qQ?docId=4e7416971db1440ea57676e9e921c226


image
«1

Re: Marine discharged for anti-Obama FB posts

  • Thoughts from those with a closer connection to the military?

    (I don't, this is just my thoughts).  My first reaction was that it seemed over-the-top to discharge him over critical FB posts.  Apparently, though, as a member of the armed services his 1st Amendment rights are limited, and he was told by superior officers to knock it off.  He also posted he wouldn't obey orders from Obama.  At that point, I can see where it would be grounds for discharge.


    image
  • Insubordination of his Commander in Chief. Also, some of the posts were on Marine facebook pages, which means he was acting on behalf of the Marines while posting.  It's not even a First Amendment argument at that point.
    image
  • Yeah, sucks to be him, but I have no sympathy. 
  • If a civilian made a FB page mocking his CEO; I bet they wouldn't be working there much longer.

    I had some sympathy when it was 1 status update, but then there were other incidents and previous warnings so now I think he got what was coming to him.

    image Anniversary
  • 15 words? The article I read had a picture showing his banner pic being a "Nobama" logo. And a pic is worth a thousand words, right?

    I don't have a lot of sympathy. If I trashed my boss to that extent in a public way, I would expect to be fired too.  

  • First, he knew the rules imposed on the military. Second, he was told to stop and he didn't. Third, if I created FB pages with the goal of insulting my CEO, posting on company sites as if I represent that company, and I was stupid enough to use my real name, I'd be fired too.

    Freedom of speech does not equal freedom from consequences. He got discharged; in other countries, he'd be in jail or would have "disappeared."

  • I have zero problem with this case.  He got more than fair warning.
  • He broke the rules.  He took an oath, the same one I did.  He took it on his own accord.  He knew the consequences.  He was in a leadership position.  He was an idiot.
    Shot first, questions later.
  • No sympathy from me (former Marine) or any of the active duty Marines I know.

    He publicly stated he would disobey the orders of the Commander in Chief and encouraged others to do the same, even if they politically disagreed with their chain of command.  Imagine the chaos that could create in a civilian office.  Now imagine that in a combat zone.   

    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • I don't have a closer connection to the military but I have no problem with this.

    As others have said if you did this to the CEO of your company you'd likely be getting fired as well.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPicAlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickersAlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • This guy sounds like a simple dumbass. Who made news for being a dumbass.
  • I get not being political in uniform/on the clock, but in general I really have a problem with personal opinions having career consequences. If I want to support a candidate who is not currently my boss, I should be able to do so. As for getting fired for bad-mouthing a CEO...one of many reasons I am glad I don't work in the private sector. However, stating that he would not comply with the orders of a superior (CIC), I agree that is a work related issue. Also, if he was in fact posting as a "marine" (on their site as indicated above) rather than as a citizen, then yes, being fired is appropriate. I can write a letter to the editor, but if I mail a letter on official letterhead opposing the organization, my stuff will have already been packed because I fully expect to be fired.
  • I have some sympathy for him, but at the same time, he received multiple warnings and given his job title I get why he was discharged. 
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagecurmudgeon:
    I get not being political in uniform/on the clock, but in general I really have a problem with personal opinions having career consequences. If I want to support a candidate who is not currently my boss, I should be able to do so. As for getting fired for bad-mouthing a CEO...one of many reasons I am glad I don't work in the private sector. However, stating that he would not comply with the orders of a superior (CIC), I agree that is a work related issue. Also, if he was in fact posting as a "marine" (on their site as indicated above) rather than as a citizen, then yes, being fired is appropriate. I can write a letter to the editor, but if I mail a letter on official letterhead opposing the organization, my stuff will have already been packed because I fully expect to be fired.

    The entire issue has little to do with his political preferences and views. He can support whoever or whichever party he chooses.  It's about him violating direct orders, breaking a contract (his oath), and most importantly inciting insubordination which can deteriorate discipline and wreak havoc on a unit. That's when you get people pissing on bodies.

     


    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • imageDylanite:
    This guy sounds like a simple dumbass. Who made news for being a dumbass.
    Lol - is that a serious question?  I can think of plenty.
    image
    Anything you can achieve through hard work, you could also just buy.
  • imageMrsAxilla:
    imageDylanite:
    This guy sounds like a simple dumbass. Who made news for being a dumbass.
    Lol - is that a serious question?  I can think of plenty.

    It's not a question.  :) 

  • I have to say - at first glance, both DH and I were p!ssed off at the headline- but reading into it- it's his own fault.

    We (dh and I) respect the office of the president/commander and chief - and if that is the way the oath/rules are stated- then he got what he deserved... or was hoping to have done to him - who knows.

    I also know that serving can also screw you up mentally - my BIL is a mess in so many ways since his tours in Afganistan...  so it's possible this guy is just fried in the brain and that is why he kept doing what he was doing .... either way -  he got what he deserved.

    I used to be Goldie_locks_5 but the new nest is so screwed up that I was forced to start over.
    image
    imageimage
  • imageDylanite:

    imageMrsAxilla:
    imageDylanite:
    This guy sounds like a simple dumbass. Who made news for being a dumbass.
    Lol - is that a serious question?  I can think of plenty.

    It's not a question.  :) 

    Dumbass here, too.
    image
    Anything you can achieve through hard work, you could also just buy.
  • MrsDLMrsDL member

    More facebook stupidity. Obama is the Commander and Cheif and he is in the military, his comments were inappropriate and he got what he deserved for being such an idiot. Warnings or no warnings, he brought it on himself, it's hard to feel bad for him.

    imageBaby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagebootsie08:

    imagecurmudgeon:
    I get not being political in uniform/on the clock, but in general I really have a problem with personal opinions having career consequences. If I want to support a candidate who is not currently my boss, I should be able to do so. As for getting fired for bad-mouthing a CEO...one of many reasons I am glad I don't work in the private sector. However, stating that he would not comply with the orders of a superior (CIC), I agree that is a work related issue. Also, if he was in fact posting as a "marine" (on their site as indicated above) rather than as a citizen, then yes, being fired is appropriate. I can write a letter to the editor, but if I mail a letter on official letterhead opposing the organization, my stuff will have already been packed because I fully expect to be fired.

    The entire issue has little to do with his political preferences and views. He can support whoever or whichever party he chooses.  It's about him violating direct orders, breaking a contract (his oath), and most importantly inciting insubordination which can deteriorate discipline and wreak havoc on a unit. That's when you get people pissing on bodies.

     



    I understand that he went beyond expressing personal opinion when he stated he would not comply with orders from a superior. However, is it worse to be insubordinate or comply with illegal or immoral practices (I am not advocating for him, he clearly screwed up)? He did clarify that he believed the orders to be illegal, if this were the case of a whistleblower (say, where there were documented instances of illegality or that were harmful to the public) wouldn't everyone be rabidly in support of the fired individual? Again, I believe he deserved to be fired, but I truly hate when Facebook is a factor in a job and I believe that people should be able to express their opinions/concerns, especially military who, IIRC, are "fighting to protect our freedoms (including speech)."
  • At the headline, I thought it was ridiculous.  Then I read more.

    This guy is an idiot.  I'm guessing he was also the type to run his mouth at work, too.  

    I knew someone who had one of those Bush countdown thingies on his desk, and that was enough to get reprimanded.  

    You absolutely can have political views, even in the military, that are counter to the current administration.  You just can't express it like this douche.

    image
  • He's a dumbfuuk.  You can be damned sure he knew better and decided to be a chode anyhow.

    Is that confederate flag chick legal? Seems like they'd be perfect for each other

     



    Click me, click me!
    image
  • Curmudgeon, military don't have free speech the way civilians do, so that's not even really an issue.  Just check out this restriction on how political they can be. http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/134410p.pdf

    Also, this wasn't an isolated incident about stating he wouldn't follow orders.  It was an entire campaign of smearing the president, his boss.

    image
  • From my link, just a few things that are restricted that could apply.  There are a lot of them.

    4.1.2.  A member of the Armed Forces on active duty shall not:  

    4.1.2.3.  Allow or cause to be published partisan political articles, letters, or endorsements signed or written by the member that solicits votes for or against a partisan political party, candidate, or cause.  This is distinguished from a letter to the editor as permitted under the conditions noted in subparagraph 4.1.1.6 

    4.1.2.5.  Speak before a partisan political gathering, including any gathering that promotes a partisan political party, candidate, or cause. 

       4.1.2.6.  Participate in any radio, television, or other program or group discussion as an advocate for or against a partisan political party, candidate, or cause. 

     

    image
  • imageUsedToBeGoldie:

    I also know that serving can also screw you up mentally - my BIL is a mess in so many ways since his tours in Afganistan...  so it's possible this guy is just fried in the brain and that is why he kept doing what he was doing .... either way -  he got what he deserved.

    I'm sorry for your BIL, but being messed up mentally is not this guy's problem. This guy's problem is that he is a narcissist who thinks that his opinions are more important than his position as a leader in the Marine Corps. He was in a position that influences others, he was warned by his superiors, and while he has the right to say what he wants, he doesn't have the right to maintain the honor of a leadership role in the military after he says it.

    I'm glad the Marine Corps made an example of him. I hope they continue to remove service members who think the rules don't apply to them.  

    I've seen a lot of military surprise homecomings. It wouldn't work on me. I always have my back to the corner and my face to the door. Looking for terrorists, criminals, various other threats, and husbands.
  • In the words of my army friend "we are paid to not have an opinion" (regarding their commands and the presidents decisions) they are not supposed to voice their personal opinions regarding their job, they are just supposed to do it
    imageimage
  • I think there are things you think but do not say. There are things you think but do not put on Facebook for the world wide web to see. If you put a bold statement out there, you have to be prepared consequences whether someone's feelings are hurt or you get fired. Whatever happened to discretion being the better part of valor?  

    Anniversary Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Obama is his boss.  Seems pretty black and white to me.
    And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this Rock I will build my Church, and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it.
  • Former Marine here.  The guy should have given in when they gave him the chance.  He may have gotten a slap on the hand or an NJP or something not too harsh.  He doesn't obey, he gets in trouble.  He can have an opinion sure but to go about it the way he did in public was wrong.  You can bash your boss in private if need be.  You can disagree with his policy but when you're in the military you kind of do as you are told and that's it (and then b*tch about it in private later).  He went too far by posting things on FB.  And then to straight out say he would not obey orders from Obama...well, that is not exactly how it works in the military.  

    CRAFTY ME 

    my read shelf:
    Kasi's book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf)

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards