September 2009 Weddings
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

To quote MCD - gender semantics discussion

24

Re: To quote MCD - gender semantics discussion

  • imagesteeser03:
    sw2b- do you have penis envy?

    Nope. I have a great one at home.

    Seriously, I like being whom I am. I am definitely not 100% female, and I hate the restrictions society places on, and the discrimination society towards, females but I do like being a woman. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageSocialWorker2B:
    imagelneuner09:
    imageSocialWorker2B:

    imagelneuner09:
    wow, this could have been a really cool and interesting discussion under different circumstances and presented in a different manner.  Why did you have to go and ruin it?

    I agree.

    The problem is I didn't think it WOULD be a discussion. C'mon, you're a social work, you know all this stuff is true.

    I thought EVERYONE knew it was true since it was drilled into me all through school. It is introduced on day one of any psych, soc, anthro, WS, fem, etc classes.

    I was simply correcting the misuse of a word. I was NOT looking for a debate/discussion. 

    But see, this is where you get into trouble.  I also know that sex =/= gender.  But the difference between you and (among others) is that I always enjoy a good, intelligent, respectful disucssion on to the extent that people believe that is true.  Good respectful discussions are the way to provide education, not shoving things in people's faces and making them feel stupid. 

    We actually had a good, somewhat related discussion forever ago about what it meant to be a wife and "wifely duties."  Could have been a similiar discussion about what each of us thinks it means to be a woman.  Would have illustrated that sex and gender are different all on it's own.

    Yes, you are right.

    I think the problem is that it was so drilled into all of us in undergraduate (whether or not you were studying human services) that I thought, since so many people on here have attended college, everyone knew this and they were just being human - using wrong words. Something I do a lot and always appreciate when people correct me.

    I am always striving to use the best language possible and LOVE when people enlighten me to better words. I guess I thought everyone felt the same way. 

    first of all, it's very presumptive to assume that everyone on this board has been to college.  Second, even if they did, not everyone is required to even take an into level behavioral science class.  And even if they did, it was maybe intro psych.  And I'd hardly say it's "drilled" in Psych 101.  I'm sure it was certinly mentioned in ONE class, but that hardly implies that someone retained that information.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageSocialWorker2B:

    I think the problem is that it was so drilled into all of us in undergraduate (whether or not you were studying human services) that I thought, since so many people on here have attended college, everyone knew this and they were just being human - using wrong words. Something I do a lot and always appreciate when people correct me.

    Wow man.... I really hope you're not trying to pull a Tanline on us right now and implying something about those of us who do not have an undergraduate degree.

    Accidental Smiles
    updated 10.03.12
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
  • imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:

    I look at gender, sex, marriage from a more religious, conservative standpoint, so no I don't agree.

    This isn't a statement against gay marriage, but I believe that you're made either male or female and that there are certain "roles" that come along with that, both from society and religion. Fluid gender is hogwash to me. Then again, I also believe that marriage is designed to be a commited lifelong relationship between 2 people. I find it a little sad (for lack of a better word) that society forgets religion's role in gender and marriage.

    Okay.

    So, what do you say then to people who are transgendered? They are biologically male but feel, in their minds and hearts, female.

    I completely disagree about roles. Just because I have a vag doesn't mean I have to cook, clean or stay home with the kids. But, I can see where you're coming from on the roles as the good books do tell us about them. 

    Have you ever kissed a girl? Because if you have, you've proved that sexuality is fluid. I don't remember what your answer was in MB's post. 

    Actually, I was one of the few who haven't kissed a girl. Gender roles, in a biblical sense, do not mean having to "cook, clean, and stay home with the kids." There's much more to it than some sterotypical view of a "woman's place." I won't waste my time arguing with you about transgendered people or fluid sexuality or open relationships. Our views are obviously very different, and we've all learned that we can't have a real discussion with you, not in any type of respectful way. Just wanted to let my peace be known.

    I am honestly curious. And, my response to you showed I CAN have a discussion.

    I understand that there are biblical roles. I honestly thought that those were what women were responsible doing in biblical times. I am sorry. 

    Biblical text indicates that Man is the head of the household. In layman's terms, the husband figure is the boss, so to speak. His word is law. The Woman, on the other hand, is to sumbit to the Man's will. A wife exists to serve her husband and to bend to his will.

    It's not about who cooks, cleans, rears children, or who brings home the bacon. It's about who is the head of household and who is there to serve.
  • imagelneuner09:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imagelneuner09:
    imageSocialWorker2B:

    imagelneuner09:
    wow, this could have been a really cool and interesting discussion under different circumstances and presented in a different manner.  Why did you have to go and ruin it?

    I agree.

    The problem is I didn't think it WOULD be a discussion. C'mon, you're a social work, you know all this stuff is true.

    I thought EVERYONE knew it was true since it was drilled into me all through school. It is introduced on day one of any psych, soc, anthro, WS, fem, etc classes.

    I was simply correcting the misuse of a word. I was NOT looking for a debate/discussion. 

    But see, this is where you get into trouble.  I also know that sex =/= gender.  But the difference between you and (among others) is that I always enjoy a good, intelligent, respectful disucssion on to the extent that people believe that is true.  Good respectful discussions are the way to provide education, not shoving things in people's faces and making them feel stupid. 

    We actually had a good, somewhat related discussion forever ago about what it meant to be a wife and "wifely duties."  Could have been a similiar discussion about what each of us thinks it means to be a woman.  Would have illustrated that sex and gender are different all on it's own.

    Yes, you are right.

    I think the problem is that it was so drilled into all of us in undergraduate (whether or not you were studying human services) that I thought, since so many people on here have attended college, everyone knew this and they were just being human - using wrong words. Something I do a lot and always appreciate when people correct me.

    I am always striving to use the best language possible and LOVE when people enlighten me to better words. I guess I thought everyone felt the same way. 

    first of all, it's very presumptive to assume that everyone on this board has been to college.  Second, even if they did, not everyone is required to even take an into level behavioral science class.  And even if they did, it was maybe intro psych.  And I'd hardly say it's "drilled" in Psych 101.  I'm sure it was certinly mentioned in ONE class, but that hardly implies that someone retained that information.

    and HA, look, I even captured it in quotes so she can't edit it out.  She said I was RIGHT!!!  Great way to start a Monday...

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageMBMcC421:

    imageSocialWorker2B:

    I think the problem is that it was so drilled into all of us in undergraduate (whether or not you were studying human services) that I thought, since so many people on here have attended college, everyone knew this and they were just being human - using wrong words. Something I do a lot and always appreciate when people correct me.

    Wow man.... I really hope you're not trying to pull a Tanline on us right now and implying something about those of us who do not have an undergraduate degree.

    Great minds think alike MB...

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageamelianguy:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:

    I look at gender, sex, marriage from a more religious, conservative standpoint, so no I don't agree.

    This isn't a statement against gay marriage, but I believe that you're made either male or female and that there are certain "roles" that come along with that, both from society and religion. Fluid gender is hogwash to me. Then again, I also believe that marriage is designed to be a commited lifelong relationship between 2 people. I find it a little sad (for lack of a better word) that society forgets religion's role in gender and marriage.

    Okay.

    So, what do you say then to people who are transgendered? They are biologically male but feel, in their minds and hearts, female.

    I completely disagree about roles. Just because I have a vag doesn't mean I have to cook, clean or stay home with the kids. But, I can see where you're coming from on the roles as the good books do tell us about them. 

    Have you ever kissed a girl? Because if you have, you've proved that sexuality is fluid. I don't remember what your answer was in MB's post. 

    Actually, I was one of the few who haven't kissed a girl. Gender roles, in a biblical sense, do not mean having to "cook, clean, and stay home with the kids." There's much more to it than some sterotypical view of a "woman's place." I won't waste my time arguing with you about transgendered people or fluid sexuality or open relationships. Our views are obviously very different, and we've all learned that we can't have a real discussion with you, not in any type of respectful way. Just wanted to let my peace be known.

    I am honestly curious. And, my response to you showed I CAN have a discussion.

    I understand that there are biblical roles. I honestly thought that those were what women were responsible doing in biblical times. I am sorry. 

    Biblical text indicates that Man is the head of the household. In layman's terms, the husband figure is the boss, so to speak. His word is law. The Woman, on the other hand, is to sumbit to the Man's will. A wife exists to serve her husband and to bend to his will.

    It's not about who cooks, cleans, rears children, or who brings home the bacon. It's about who is the head of household and who is there to serve.

    Doesn't serving imply cooking, cleaning, children - all things which have, historically, been considered women's work.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageSocialWorker2B:

    imagesteeser03:
    sw2b- do you have penis envy?

    Nope. I have a great one at home.

    Seriously, I like being whom I am. I am definitely not 100% female, and I hate the restrictions society places on, and the discrimination society towards, females but I do like being a woman. 

    To your previous response - I was drawing a parallel about correcting people.  I never said they were equal issues.  I know they aren't.

    Just like Neuner said, it's an interesting topic, and could have led to interesting discussion.  You just sort of killed it with your delivery.  I'm just wondering why you refuse to acknowledge that you did it sort of awkwardly.  It was common knowledge at my college, too, but if somebody went to a more conservative school, or got a B.S. you should understand why it wouldn't be common knowledge for them.

    No matter how you swing your delivery, you're either judging people for misusing the words, or judging them for not knowing.  You say you're trying to help, but you really don't come off that way.

     ETA:  Ha!  I quoted the wrong thing.  Oops!

    image
  • imagelneuner09:
    imageMBMcC421:

    imageSocialWorker2B:

    I think the problem is that it was so drilled into all of us in undergraduate (whether or not you were studying human services) that I thought, since so many people on here have attended college, everyone knew this and they were just being human - using wrong words. Something I do a lot and always appreciate when people correct me.

    Wow man.... I really hope you're not trying to pull a Tanline on us right now and implying something about those of us who do not have an undergraduate degree.

    Great minds think alike MB...

    For realz.

    Accidental Smiles
    updated 10.03.12
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
  • imageSocialWorker2B:

    imagesteeser03:
    sw2b- do you have penis envy?

    Nope. I have a great one at home.

    Seriously, I like being whom I am. I am definitely not 100% female, and I hate the restrictions society places on, and the discrimination society towards, females but I do like being a woman. 

    WHO. Not whom.
  • imagelneuner09:
    imagelneuner09:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imagelneuner09:
    imageSocialWorker2B:

    imagelneuner09:
    wow, this could have been a really cool and interesting discussion under different circumstances and presented in a different manner.  Why did you have to go and ruin it?

    I agree.

    The problem is I didn't think it WOULD be a discussion. C'mon, you're a social work, you know all this stuff is true.

    I thought EVERYONE knew it was true since it was drilled into me all through school. It is introduced on day one of any psych, soc, anthro, WS, fem, etc classes.

    I was simply correcting the misuse of a word. I was NOT looking for a debate/discussion. 

    But see, this is where you get into trouble.  I also know that sex =/= gender.  But the difference between you and (among others) is that I always enjoy a good, intelligent, respectful disucssion on to the extent that people believe that is true.  Good respectful discussions are the way to provide education, not shoving things in people's faces and making them feel stupid. 

    We actually had a good, somewhat related discussion forever ago about what it meant to be a wife and "wifely duties."  Could have been a similiar discussion about what each of us thinks it means to be a woman.  Would have illustrated that sex and gender are different all on it's own.

    Yes, you are right.

    I think the problem is that it was so drilled into all of us in undergraduate (whether or not you were studying human services) that I thought, since so many people on here have attended college, everyone knew this and they were just being human - using wrong words. Something I do a lot and always appreciate when people correct me.

    I am always striving to use the best language possible and LOVE when people enlighten me to better words. I guess I thought everyone felt the same way. 

    first of all, it's very presumptive to assume that everyone on this board has been to college.  Second, even if they did, not everyone is required to even take an into level behavioral science class.  And even if they did, it was maybe intro psych.  And I'd hardly say it's "drilled" in Psych 101.  I'm sure it was certinly mentioned in ONE class, but that hardly implies that someone retained that information.

    and HA, look, I even captured it in quotes so she can't edit it out.  She said I was RIGHT!!!  Great way to start a Monday...

    I often say people are right.

    I wasn't being presumptive. I KNOW that most people on here have been to college, they've said it. And, I wasn't saying anything about people who didn't go to college. I was simply saying that most college graduates, 2 of 4 year, have been exposed to this concept.

    And, yes, it was mentioned in MY intro classes and it was such an important concept, I think I would have retained it.

    But, yes, again YOU'RE RIGHT, I shouldn't have assumed that.

    STILL when I mentioned it, MB looked at the research and she still thinks she's right. So, how do you explain that? 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageamelianguy:
    imageSocialWorker2B:

    imagesteeser03:
    sw2b- do you have penis envy?

    Nope. I have a great one at home.

    Seriously, I like being whom I am. I am definitely not 100% female, and I hate the restrictions society places on, and the discrimination society towards, females but I do like being a woman. 

    WHO. Not whom.

    Yes. Thank you. I need to learn how to type. :D 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageamelianguy:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:

    I look at gender, sex, marriage from a more religious, conservative standpoint, so no I don't agree.

    This isn't a statement against gay marriage, but I believe that you're made either male or female and that there are certain "roles" that come along with that, both from society and religion. Fluid gender is hogwash to me. Then again, I also believe that marriage is designed to be a commited lifelong relationship between 2 people. I find it a little sad (for lack of a better word) that society forgets religion's role in gender and marriage.

    Okay.

    So, what do you say then to people who are transgendered? They are biologically male but feel, in their minds and hearts, female.

    I completely disagree about roles. Just because I have a vag doesn't mean I have to cook, clean or stay home with the kids. But, I can see where you're coming from on the roles as the good books do tell us about them. 

    Have you ever kissed a girl? Because if you have, you've proved that sexuality is fluid. I don't remember what your answer was in MB's post. 

    Actually, I was one of the few who haven't kissed a girl. Gender roles, in a biblical sense, do not mean having to "cook, clean, and stay home with the kids." There's much more to it than some sterotypical view of a "woman's place." I won't waste my time arguing with you about transgendered people or fluid sexuality or open relationships. Our views are obviously very different, and we've all learned that we can't have a real discussion with you, not in any type of respectful way. Just wanted to let my peace be known.

    I am honestly curious. And, my response to you showed I CAN have a discussion.

    I understand that there are biblical roles. I honestly thought that those were what women were responsible doing in biblical times. I am sorry. 

    Biblical text indicates that Man is the head of the household. In layman's terms, the husband figure is the boss, so to speak. His word is law. The Woman, on the other hand, is to sumbit to the Man's will. A wife exists to serve her husband and to bend to his will.

    It's not about who cooks, cleans, rears children, or who brings home the bacon. It's about who is the head of household and who is there to serve.

    Doesn't serving imply cooking, cleaning, children - all things which have, historically, been considered women's work.

    Not necessarily. If the husband tells the wife that she has to go out and make the money, and he would prefer to stay home, she must do it. It's about her being obedient to her husband's wishes. I think it would be safe to say that a husband's wishes can vary from couple to couple.
  • Sorry, couldn't handle giant quote thread

    But see, that's where you are also very narrow minded.  I know that sex =/= gender, but I also know that like 75% of the world uses them interchangably.  And when someone uses gender when they mean sex, I take it for what it's worth and not look like as ass by correcting them. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagelneuner09:

    But see, that's where you are also very narrow minded.  I know that sex =/= gender, but I also know that like 75% of the world uses them interchangably.  And when someone uses gender when they mean sex, I take it for what it's worth and not look like as ass by correcting them. 

    Thank you.

    Accidental Smiles
    updated 10.03.12
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
  • imagedbucks:
    imageSocialWorker2B:

    imagesteeser03:
    sw2b- do you have penis envy?

    Nope. I have a great one at home.

    Seriously, I like being whom I am. I am definitely not 100% female, and I hate the restrictions society places on, and the discrimination society towards, females but I do like being a woman. 

    To your previous response - I was drawing a parallel about correcting people.  I never said they were equal issues.  I know they aren't.

    Just like Neuner said, it's an interesting topic, and could have led to interesting discussion.  You just sort of killed it with your delivery.  I'm just wondering why you refuse to acknowledge that you did it sort of awkwardly.  It was common knowledge at my college, too, but if somebody went to a more conservative school, or got a B.S. you should understand why it wouldn't be common knowledge for them.

    No matter how you swing your delivery, you're either judging people for misusing the words, or judging them for not knowing.  You say you're trying to help, but you really don't come off that way.

     ETA:  Ha!  I quoted the wrong thing.  Oops!

    Yes, I acknowledge that my delivery killed the prospect of a debate.

    However, the point you're missing is that I didn't think my comment was going to lead for a debate so I wasn't trying to set one up.

    I do apologize for assuming. Like I said, in my life, it's common knowledge. I would be open to a debate now. Perhaps in a new post. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageamelianguy:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:

    I look at gender, sex, marriage from a more religious, conservative standpoint, so no I don't agree.

    This isn't a statement against gay marriage, but I believe that you're made either male or female and that there are certain "roles" that come along with that, both from society and religion. Fluid gender is hogwash to me. Then again, I also believe that marriage is designed to be a commited lifelong relationship between 2 people. I find it a little sad (for lack of a better word) that society forgets religion's role in gender and marriage.

    Okay.

    So, what do you say then to people who are transgendered? They are biologically male but feel, in their minds and hearts, female.

    I completely disagree about roles. Just because I have a vag doesn't mean I have to cook, clean or stay home with the kids. But, I can see where you're coming from on the roles as the good books do tell us about them. 

    Have you ever kissed a girl? Because if you have, you've proved that sexuality is fluid. I don't remember what your answer was in MB's post. 

    Actually, I was one of the few who haven't kissed a girl. Gender roles, in a biblical sense, do not mean having to "cook, clean, and stay home with the kids." There's much more to it than some sterotypical view of a "woman's place." I won't waste my time arguing with you about transgendered people or fluid sexuality or open relationships. Our views are obviously very different, and we've all learned that we can't have a real discussion with you, not in any type of respectful way. Just wanted to let my peace be known.

    I am honestly curious. And, my response to you showed I CAN have a discussion.

    I understand that there are biblical roles. I honestly thought that those were what women were responsible doing in biblical times. I am sorry. 

    Biblical text indicates that Man is the head of the household. In layman's terms, the husband figure is the boss, so to speak. His word is law. The Woman, on the other hand, is to sumbit to the Man's will. A wife exists to serve her husband and to bend to his will.

    It's not about who cooks, cleans, rears children, or who brings home the bacon. It's about who is the head of household and who is there to serve.

     

    Not quite. The wife is called to submit to her husband. Submission, means the man has a mission for the family, and the wife is there to aide him in that mission. I don't think, I could be wrong, but I don't think there is any New Testament scripture that indicates that a wife is to serve her husband and bend to his will.

    The husband is equally if not more responsible to love his wife as Christ loved the church. (which is the following scripture to the wives submit to your husbands) If Christ was willing to die for the church and do all that he did, the husband should never be in a place of authority that is a threat or a negative to the wife or family.

    I'm not there to serve my husband any more than he is to serve me. God made Eve from the rib of Adam, to be by his side, not behind or in front. As a team.



    Zuma Zoom
    image
  • imageamelianguy:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageamelianguy:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:

    I look at gender, sex, marriage from a more religious, conservative standpoint, so no I don't agree.

    This isn't a statement against gay marriage, but I believe that you're made either male or female and that there are certain "roles" that come along with that, both from society and religion. Fluid gender is hogwash to me. Then again, I also believe that marriage is designed to be a commited lifelong relationship between 2 people. I find it a little sad (for lack of a better word) that society forgets religion's role in gender and marriage.

    Okay.

    So, what do you say then to people who are transgendered? They are biologically male but feel, in their minds and hearts, female.

    I completely disagree about roles. Just because I have a vag doesn't mean I have to cook, clean or stay home with the kids. But, I can see where you're coming from on the roles as the good books do tell us about them. 

    Have you ever kissed a girl? Because if you have, you've proved that sexuality is fluid. I don't remember what your answer was in MB's post. 

    Actually, I was one of the few who haven't kissed a girl. Gender roles, in a biblical sense, do not mean having to "cook, clean, and stay home with the kids." There's much more to it than some sterotypical view of a "woman's place." I won't waste my time arguing with you about transgendered people or fluid sexuality or open relationships. Our views are obviously very different, and we've all learned that we can't have a real discussion with you, not in any type of respectful way. Just wanted to let my peace be known.

    I am honestly curious. And, my response to you showed I CAN have a discussion.

    I understand that there are biblical roles. I honestly thought that those were what women were responsible doing in biblical times. I am sorry. 

    Biblical text indicates that Man is the head of the household. In layman's terms, the husband figure is the boss, so to speak. His word is law. The Woman, on the other hand, is to sumbit to the Man's will. A wife exists to serve her husband and to bend to his will.

    It's not about who cooks, cleans, rears children, or who brings home the bacon. It's about who is the head of household and who is there to serve.

    Doesn't serving imply cooking, cleaning, children - all things which have, historically, been considered women's work.

    Not necessarily. If the husband tells the wife that she has to go out and make the money, and he would prefer to stay home, she must do it. It's about her being obedient to her husband's wishes. I think it would be safe to say that a husband's wishes can vary from couple to couple.

    Yes, very true.

    However, most of the time, the husband did tell the wife to stay home and do those things. 

    But, I see what you're seeing, and what DD was trying to tell me. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagelneuner09:

    Sorry, couldn't handle giant quote thread

    But see, that's where you are also very narrow minded.  I know that sex =/= gender, but I also know that like 75% of the world uses them interchangably.  And when someone uses gender when they mean sex, I take it for what it's worth and not look like as ass by correcting them. 

    I did NOT try to make anyone look like an ass with my OP about all this. It was only after MB looked at the evidence and still thought she was wife, that I was astounded.

    Okay, yes, you know that they're different and you know that people don't know that - you don't think it's your responsibility (not as a social worker, but as a person) to educate people? Lack of education is what leads to things like killing a gay high school student or raping a pre op patient. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageSMorriso:
    imageamelianguy:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:

    I look at gender, sex, marriage from a more religious, conservative standpoint, so no I don't agree.

    This isn't a statement against gay marriage, but I believe that you're made either male or female and that there are certain "roles" that come along with that, both from society and religion. Fluid gender is hogwash to me. Then again, I also believe that marriage is designed to be a commited lifelong relationship between 2 people. I find it a little sad (for lack of a better word) that society forgets religion's role in gender and marriage.

    Okay.

    So, what do you say then to people who are transgendered? They are biologically male but feel, in their minds and hearts, female.

    I completely disagree about roles. Just because I have a vag doesn't mean I have to cook, clean or stay home with the kids. But, I can see where you're coming from on the roles as the good books do tell us about them. 

    Have you ever kissed a girl? Because if you have, you've proved that sexuality is fluid. I don't remember what your answer was in MB's post. 

    Actually, I was one of the few who haven't kissed a girl. Gender roles, in a biblical sense, do not mean having to "cook, clean, and stay home with the kids." There's much more to it than some sterotypical view of a "woman's place." I won't waste my time arguing with you about transgendered people or fluid sexuality or open relationships. Our views are obviously very different, and we've all learned that we can't have a real discussion with you, not in any type of respectful way. Just wanted to let my peace be known.

    I am honestly curious. And, my response to you showed I CAN have a discussion.

    I understand that there are biblical roles. I honestly thought that those were what women were responsible doing in biblical times. I am sorry. 

    Biblical text indicates that Man is the head of the household. In layman's terms, the husband figure is the boss, so to speak. His word is law. The Woman, on the other hand, is to sumbit to the Man's will. A wife exists to serve her husband and to bend to his will.

    It's not about who cooks, cleans, rears children, or who brings home the bacon. It's about who is the head of household and who is there to serve.

     

    Not quite. The wife is called to submit to her husband. Submission, means the man has a mission for the family, and the wife is there to aide him in that mission. I don't think, I could be wrong, but I don't think there is any New Testament scripture that indicates that a wife is to serve her husband and bend to his will.

    The husband is equally if not more responsible to love his wife as Christ loved the church. (which is the following scripture to the wives submit to your husbands) If Christ was willing to die for the church and do all that he did, the husband should never be in a place of authority that is a threat or a negative to the wife or family.

    I'm not there to serve my husband any more than he is to serve me. God made Eve from the rib of Adam, to be by his side, not behind or in front. As a team.

    I agree with what you're saying. 

    When I said biblical, I meant the old testament.

    I am not religious, and therefore do not believe in the bible, however I agree that my husband should serve me 50% and I should serve him 50% - not that it's ever exactly 50/50. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageSocialWorker2B:
    imagelneuner09:

    Sorry, couldn't handle giant quote thread

    But see, that's where you are also very narrow minded.  I know that sex =/= gender, but I also know that like 75% of the world uses them interchangably.  And when someone uses gender when they mean sex, I take it for what it's worth and not look like as ass by correcting them. 

    Okay, yes, you know that they're different and you know that people don't know that - you don't think it's your responsibility (not as a social worker, but as a person) to educate people? Lack of education is what leads to things like killing a gay high school student or raping a pre op patient. 

    So using "gender" and "sex" interchangeably makes one a threat to society?  Awesome...

    Accidental Smiles
    updated 10.03.12
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
  • imageMBMcC421:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imagelneuner09:

    Sorry, couldn't handle giant quote thread

    But see, that's where you are also very narrow minded.  I know that sex =/= gender, but I also know that like 75% of the world uses them interchangably.  And when someone uses gender when they mean sex, I take it for what it's worth and not look like as ass by correcting them. 

    Okay, yes, you know that they're different and you know that people don't know that - you don't think it's your responsibility (not as a social worker, but as a person) to educate people? Lack of education is what leads to things like killing a gay high school student or raping a pre op patient. 

    So using "gender" and "sex" interchangeably makes one a threat to society?  Awesome...

    Yes. By continuing on, being ignorant of the true definitions of these words, you are allowing these myths to continue on. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageSMorriso:
    imageamelianguy:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imageDiamond_Doll:

    I look at gender, sex, marriage from a more religious, conservative standpoint, so no I don't agree.

    This isn't a statement against gay marriage, but I believe that you're made either male or female and that there are certain "roles" that come along with that, both from society and religion. Fluid gender is hogwash to me. Then again, I also believe that marriage is designed to be a commited lifelong relationship between 2 people. I find it a little sad (for lack of a better word) that society forgets religion's role in gender and marriage.

    Okay.

    So, what do you say then to people who are transgendered? They are biologically male but feel, in their minds and hearts, female.

    I completely disagree about roles. Just because I have a vag doesn't mean I have to cook, clean or stay home with the kids. But, I can see where you're coming from on the roles as the good books do tell us about them. 

    Have you ever kissed a girl? Because if you have, you've proved that sexuality is fluid. I don't remember what your answer was in MB's post. 

    Actually, I was one of the few who haven't kissed a girl. Gender roles, in a biblical sense, do not mean having to "cook, clean, and stay home with the kids." There's much more to it than some sterotypical view of a "woman's place." I won't waste my time arguing with you about transgendered people or fluid sexuality or open relationships. Our views are obviously very different, and we've all learned that we can't have a real discussion with you, not in any type of respectful way. Just wanted to let my peace be known.

    I am honestly curious. And, my response to you showed I CAN have a discussion.

    I understand that there are biblical roles. I honestly thought that those were what women were responsible doing in biblical times. I am sorry. 

    Biblical text indicates that Man is the head of the household. In layman's terms, the husband figure is the boss, so to speak. His word is law. The Woman, on the other hand, is to sumbit to the Man's will. A wife exists to serve her husband and to bend to his will.

    It's not about who cooks, cleans, rears children, or who brings home the bacon. It's about who is the head of household and who is there to serve.

     

    Not quite. The wife is called to submit to her husband. Submission, means the man has a mission for the family, and the wife is there to aide him in that mission. I don't think, I could be wrong, but I don't think there is any New Testament scripture that indicates that a wife is to serve her husband and bend to his will.

    The husband is equally if not more responsible to love his wife as Christ loved the church. (which is the following scripture to the wives submit to your husbands) If Christ was willing to die for the church and do all that he did, the husband should never be in a place of authority that is a threat or a negative to the wife or family.

    I'm not there to serve my husband any more than he is to serve me. God made Eve from the rib of Adam, to be by his side, not behind or in front. As a team.

    I never indicated that the husband should be a threat or treat the wife in a negative manner. And yes, while the husband is called to love his wife as Christ loves the church, the wife is called to be a support system to the will of her husband, who is called to lead his family in God's will.

    Nowhere did I say that if the wife disagrees with the husband that the husband has the right to inflict punishment on her. My intent was to explain to SW2B that biblical roles are more broad than just "husband makes the money, wife takes care of the house and kids." I'm sorry if I was not clear enough.
  • imagelneuner09:
    imageSocialWorker2B:
    imagelneuner09:
    imageSocialWorker2B:

    imagelneuner09:
    wow, this could have been a really cool and interesting discussion under different circumstances and presented in a different manner.  Why did you have to go and ruin it?

    I agree.

    The problem is I didn't think it WOULD be a discussion. C'mon, you're a social work, you know all this stuff is true.

    I thought EVERYONE knew it was true since it was drilled into me all through school. It is introduced on day one of any psych, soc, anthro, WS, fem, etc classes.

    I was simply correcting the misuse of a word. I was NOT looking for a debate/discussion. 

    But see, this is where you get into trouble.  I also know that sex =/= gender.  But the difference between you and (among others) is that I always enjoy a good, intelligent, respectful disucssion on to the extent that people believe that is true.  Good respectful discussions are the way to provide education, not shoving things in people's faces and making them feel stupid. 

    We actually had a good, somewhat related discussion forever ago about what it meant to be a wife and "wifely duties."  Could have been a similiar discussion about what each of us thinks it means to be a woman.  Would have illustrated that sex and gender are different all on it's own.

    Yes, you are right.

    I think the problem is that it was so drilled into all of us in undergraduate (whether or not you were studying human services) that I thought, since so many people on here have attended college, everyone knew this and they were just being human - using wrong words. Something I do a lot and always appreciate when people correct me.

    I am always striving to use the best language possible and LOVE when people enlighten me to better words. I guess I thought everyone felt the same way. 

    first of all, it's very presumptive to assume that everyone on this board has been to college.  Second, even if they did, not everyone is required to even take an into level behavioral science class.  And even if they did, it was maybe intro psych.  And I'd hardly say it's "drilled" in Psych 101.  I'm sure it was certinly mentioned in ONE class, but that hardly implies that someone retained that information.

     I was going to stay out of this but I agree with neuner. Since I was a science major for most of my time there, I only took intro psych because I needed an elective and it fit into my schedule. It was not a required class to take. The whole gender vs. sex topic was only discussed for less than half a class. Honestly, I didn't even remember it until I came onto the bump boards and saw people calling eachother out for using the wrong word. I also agree that there is a difference between a healthy discussion and calling people out and making them feel stupid. Hopefully you do not do that with your clients because I do not see how that would help any one of them.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Dx: Hashimoto's Hypothyroidism After 2 years TTC & failed IUs,we have our IVF baby born 9/24/11

    LO#2 aka 'Miracle Baby' Orig. EDD= 9/28 EDD moved to 10/3/13
    Lilypie Second Birthday tickers Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
    "Most of the important things in the world have been accomplished by people who have kept on trying when there seemed to be no hope at all." -- Dale Carnegie
    "Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time." --Thomas A. Edison
  • Amelia -

    See, I disagree that the wife is to support the husband while the husband supports the church/christ.

    I support my husband in his career and my husband supports me in my work and school.

    That's how it should be, I think. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageSocialWorker2B:

    imagelneuner09:
    wow, this could have been a really cool and interesting discussion under different circumstances and presented in a different manner.  Why did you have to go and ruin it?

    I agree.

    The problem is I didn't think it WOULD be a discussion. C'mon, you're a social work, you know all this stuff is true.

    I thought EVERYONE knew it was true since it was drilled into me all through school. It is introduced on day one of any psych, soc, anthro, WS, fem, etc classes.

    I was simply correcting the misuse of a word. I was NOT looking for a debate/discussion. 

    Really?  Because I'm pretty sure your original post states:  So, what do people think? Does everyone know that gender and sex are two very different things or is this a new concept for most?

    Sounds like the opening for a debate/discussion was there.  And, as Nooner pointed out, a rational, adult discussion would have been welcome.  But, I am pretty sure you were only trying to start trouble....which is where you always screw yourself.

    Pregnancy Ticker
  • Mrs Mo -

    I agree with what you/neuner said as well.

    It was obviously different at my schools. However, since I didn't attend everyone else's schools, I assumed (apparently incorrectly) that it was this way everywhere else. That I do apologize for.

    And, I wasn't trying to call anyone out, as I often use the wrong word as well, I was simply drawing everyone's attention to how important it is to be diligent on these types of matters. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageSocialWorker2B:
    imagelneuner09:

    Sorry, couldn't handle giant quote thread

    But see, that's where you are also very narrow minded.  I know that sex =/= gender, but I also know that like 75% of the world uses them interchangably.  And when someone uses gender when they mean sex, I take it for what it's worth and not look like as ass by correcting them. 

    I did NOT try to make anyone look like an ass with my OP about all this. It was only after MB looked at the evidence and still thought she was wife, that I was astounded.

    Okay, yes, you know that they're different and you know that people don't know that - you don't think it's your responsibility (not as a social worker, but as a person) to educate people? Lack of education is what leads to things like killing a gay high school student or raping a pre op patient. 

    I didn't say you made the OP look like an ass, I meant you made yourself look like an ass.

    And yes, to an extent it is my responsibility to correct misconceptions like this.  I deal with it every day with mental health and addiction stigmas.  At the same time, I want to behave in socially appropriate manners.  And there are times and places when that it more important than my social responsbility.  You basic cost-benefit analysis.  It was more important to be supportive to Tara.  Same if I'm having a conversation at a cocktail party with a bunch of strangers.  I'm not going to choose that avenue to "educate the world!"  It's not appropriate. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Well damn, look what I started.  And I used the term "sex" in my post, not "gender" but if you were jumping on someone else for interchanging the words (I didn't notice any specifics last time I read the thread), who the fluck cares?!?!  People interchange those words all the time; I really don't think that's causing the problem with society's views towards transgendered individuals. 

    SW2B, if you went on any of The Bump boards, you'd see the use of "gender" instead of "sex" ALL the freaking time.  Some people do correct other posters, but it never turns into this big of a debate.  No one's threatening society here.  I was an English and linguistics major and I'm a huge grammar Nazi (who is prone to all kinds of typos) and I'm not particularly bothered by this issue at all.  There are far worse things to worry about impacting society than switching around "sex" and "gender."

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageSocialWorker2B:

    And, MB?

    Ummmm, the dictionary you mentioned............well, um, it agrees that sex and gender are two different things.

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender

    It says how gender are the traits society generally associated with sex.

    HAHAHA.

    Not that I need a dictionary since my years of undergraduate work have told me, over and over again, that gender =/= sex. 

    Real matureYes

    Pregnancy Ticker
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards