Politics & Current Events
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

2nd Debate Thoughts?

24567

Re: 2nd Debate Thoughts?

  • I admit that I am an Obama supporter, but I still say he, "won." It was obvious after the last debate that he did not do well, and I was able to admit that then.  It boggles the mind that cons say Ryan and Romney did well in the last two debates.  I honestly thought they were both terrible. 

    Last night, Romney was short on facts and swift on attacks and being a jerk.  He came off as a pompous asss.  I can't wait until this election is over and he can take his binders full of women and go home.  

    He may have appealed to his base last night, but I very much doubt he found any new voters.   

  • image**cantwait**:
    imageHopeforthebest:

    Obama won. Goes to round 3

     

    Curious as to how you got to this?  I saw Romney as more confident, more apt to answer the questions rather than defend his positions over and over and more presidential. 

    Because if you looked at this debate with open eyes and try to view the candidates as a lot of these undecideds and even other voters who are just now paying attention, Obama came off cleaner. His answers tended to be more to the point.

    Romney lost his momentum after the moderator egregiously played favorites w/the Libya Rose Garden comment. I think he was so baffled by it, he never fully recovered. I was literally shocked she inserted herself that way into a Presidential debate.

    I thought Romney was a little too eager to "Catch" Obama and call him out on things and this time it didn't play well for me.

    I Hate Hate Hated the Binder comment and literally cringed. I already think he has an uphill battle with women and to me that was like robotic or something . Bring me a Binder of females...what!?!?

    The single parent comment didn't bother me at all, but a FB friend of mine completely heard a different version of what he said and I was befuddled.

     

  • imagevlagrl29:
    imageCoffeeBeen:
    imagevlagrl29:
    .....at least the democrats on here will post ligit links.  

    Vlag, are you coming onto me?

     maybe a little.  it makes me respect you guys more. you are much less aggravating now 

    I knew you'd come around.  Political differences aside, we're pretty awesome. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageascd:
    imageManneek1977:

    Obama won.....

    Obama nailed Romney at the end. Romney can't escape his 47% comments, no matter what he says.

    Apparently Mitt "FORGOT" which deductions he was going to cut to make up for the 5 trillion dollar increase the deficit he wants to add. I think I will FORGET to vote for him. Nerve was a option to begin with anyways...

    I love how Obama gave specific over specific but Romney had none. I love how Obama stood up to Romney and told him "Yes I take responsibility." Romney had the chance....he blew it. Obama caught him in soooo many lies.

    Romney said 1 in 6 are in poverty, and he said he is not willing the top 1% to help out a little more?

    Romney lost the biggest point of conflict that he himself created, viz., he denied that Obama had referred to the Benghazi, Libya deaths as a result of "acts of terror" when Obama addressed the Nation from the Rose garden on the day after the attack. If you listen to the transcript (only about 5 minutes long) you will hear Obama referring to these "acts of terror" in a way that clearly encompassed the Lybia deaths which was the subject of the speech.
    THIS WAS A BIG LOSS OF CREDIBILITY FOR ROMNEY! HE CAN'T SQUIRM OUT OF IT!

    I will cont later today, The wine is kicking!

    Actually, the Benghazi thing is incorrect - Mod even admitted it later.  Obama never referred to the specific Benghazi attack as an act of terror.  Took him another two weeks to come forward with that. I thought they both did what they needed to do although I felt Obama was on the defensive quite often.  I enjoyed Romney's "settling" comment and have to agree with those posters who've figured out that we cannot afford 4 more years.

    That's not true.  He specifically said "act of terror" in the speech - he wasn't just randomly talking about other acts of terror, he was referring to the Libya consulate attack.

    Romney was trying to make a different point and he chose the wrong fact to pounce on - he should have been more precise.  The point Romney was trying to make was that the Obama administration fully or partially tied the internet video to the attacks for two weeks after the fact. Romney wanted to debate spontaneous act of terror versus planned act of terror, not whether it was an act of terror itself. 

    I do think Romney could have made a strong point if he'd gone about it correctly.  But it's tough to say who actually knew what because it sounds like they were still collecting intelligence for several weeks, so I'm not sure if Obama did know or not - and even if he did know I'm not sure it would have been appropriate for him to show our hand. 

    If the investigation shows that Obama is to blame then I'm more than willing to accept that.  The details are just so sketchy at this point.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • i felt i had to get in on this and I'm new to the board. I am also a registered independent and an undecided voter (with a pro romney husband, in my ear all day and night)...

    the ONE thing that I thought really brought Mitt underwater for me was the women in the workplace thing. I didn't read through every post in this thread I got about half way down so excuse me if this was said already. But why do we need to have flex hours for women? So they can go home at 5:00 and "get dinner on the table".....

    becuase...it's 1950.

    that kind of stuck with me.

    Although I felt as if Obama is employing someone from a PR 101 class in college who was liek "don't forget, no matter what they ask, you want to turn the conversation back to your talking points. Now let's review your talking points again".

    The only person who has ever sucessfully and easily done the whole "return to talking points" thing in a smooth manner that I have viewed over the years is Al Gore.

  • imageBrina105:

    i felt i had to get in on this and I'm new to the board. I am also a registered independent and an undecided voter (with a pro romney husband, in my ear all day and night)...

    the ONE thing that I thought really brought Mitt underwater for me was the women in the workplace thing. I didn't read through every post in this thread I got about half way down so excuse me if this was said already. But why do we need to have flex hours for women? So they can go home at 5:00 and "get dinner on the table".....

    becuase...it's 1950.

    that kind of stuck with me.

    Although I felt as if Obama is employing someone from a PR 101 class in college who was liek "don't forget, no matter what they ask, you want to turn the conversation back to your talking points. Now let's review your talking points again".

    The only person who has ever sucessfully and easily done the whole "return to talking points" thing in a smooth manner that I have viewed over the years is Al Gore.

    I feel the same way about the women comment.  Besides, DH makes dinner.  Does that mean I lose my flex benefits?  Bummer.

    Would you let Obama's debate style sway your vote?  I mean, you're not voting for a debater, you're voting for an elected official who will sign bills and set policies. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I felt like Romeny was nitpicky with Candy Crowley, and repeatedly showed how out-of-touch he is with women and the average Joe's wallet.

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • No the debating "style" def. won't effect my vote. I just felt that as someone who works in public relations, ti seems like he needs a bit more coaching. Certainly, debating with someone who has been a powerhouse in a board room and probably made a few back alley deals is difficult for someone who is rather reserved and quiet.

    But at the end of the day, he didn't say anything to offensive to me. Only Mitt Romeny did. Am I going to chose who I vote for based on who expects their wife to cook them dinner at 5 pm, no... but it is something to think about in a more general way: How the president views the "role" of a woman.

     Heck, once I have kids, I'd love to have flex hours...so I'm not really complaining.

    I am not so educated in the environmental topics and off shore drilling etc, so I even took one of those "who should I vote for " quizzes to see basically where I stood (I wasn't even sure) of course my results came out 51% romeny, 49% Obama....heck- a  true independent.

  • regarding his no plan:  http://www.mittromney.com/sites/default/files/shared/BelieveInAmerica-PlanForJobsAndEconomicGrowth-Full.pdf

    and before you say it's biased, well romney did think of it.  I'm sure though you won't even read it.

    regarding flex pay:  I think it's awesome he at least provided that option.  not many places do.

    Honestly I don't see a land slide win either way.  I guess if you like obama, he won and if you like romney, he won.

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagemissymo:
    imageascd:
    imageManneek1977:

    Obama won.....

    Obama nailed Romney at the end. Romney can't escape his 47% comments, no matter what he says.

    Apparently Mitt "FORGOT" which deductions he was going to cut to make up for the 5 trillion dollar increase the deficit he wants to add. I think I will FORGET to vote for him. Nerve was a option to begin with anyways...

    I love how Obama gave specific over specific but Romney had none. I love how Obama stood up to Romney and told him "Yes I take responsibility." Romney had the chance....he blew it. Obama caught him in soooo many lies.

    Romney said 1 in 6 are in poverty, and he said he is not willing the top 1% to help out a little more?

    Romney lost the biggest point of conflict that he himself created, viz., he denied that Obama had referred to the Benghazi, Libya deaths as a result of "acts of terror" when Obama addressed the Nation from the Rose garden on the day after the attack. If you listen to the transcript (only about 5 minutes long) you will hear Obama referring to these "acts of terror" in a way that clearly encompassed the Lybia deaths which was the subject of the speech.
    THIS WAS A BIG LOSS OF CREDIBILITY FOR ROMNEY! HE CAN'T SQUIRM OUT OF IT!

    I will cont later today, The wine is kicking!

    Actually, the Benghazi thing is incorrect - Mod even admitted it later.  Obama never referred to the specific Benghazi attack as an act of terror.  Took him another two weeks to come forward with that. I thought they both did what they needed to do although I felt Obama was on the defensive quite often.  I enjoyed Romney's "settling" comment and have to agree with those posters who've figured out that we cannot afford 4 more years.

    Ugh.  Your trying to twist people up over semantics! When Obama said,  ""No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for."

    To what do you think he was referring? He made that statement the day after the attacks, in the rose garden.   How about we turn to the real issues.  All the coverage I watched on the debate had undecideds disliking Romney trying to hammer on Libya.


    really?  I went to a unbiased website last night that had a group of people that voted for obama last time are all voting romney this time. 

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • My friends who are independent did not take offense to his comment about flex hours for women at all. There are a lot of women who are single parents left with children to care for these days. It's the reality of what holds women back from advancing in the work-place, getting full-time status, etc...
  • Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."


  • imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."


    Those statements do bother me, but he said them publicly and wasn't caught on tape saying it. I guess Romney's "47%" statement didn't bother you?


    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."


    Those statements do bother me, but he said them publicly and wasn't caught on tape saying it. I guess Romney's "47%" statement didn't bother you?

    Romney didn't say that publicly? I thought he was speaking to a crowd. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Let's face it....they all f#ck up.  

  • imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."


    Those statements do bother me, but he said them publicly and wasn't caught on tape saying it. I guess Romney's "47%" statement didn't bother you?

    Romney didn't say that publicly? I thought he was speaking to a crowd. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Let's face it....they all f#ck up.  

    Umm, exactly. What someone does and says privately when they think no one is looking speaks volumes, right?


    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."


    Those statements do bother me, but he said them publicly and wasn't caught on tape saying it. I guess Romney's "47%" statement didn't bother you?

    Romney didn't say that publicly? I thought he was speaking to a crowd. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Let's face it....they all f#ck up.  

    Umm, exactly. What someone does and says privately when they think no one is looking speaks volumes, right?

    So he said this privately in a office setting with a friend? I thought he was speaking in front of a crowd. Gonna Google..

  • imagecatsareniice1:
    My friends who are independent did not take offense to his comment about flex hours for women at all. There are a lot of women who are single parents left with children to care for these days. It's the reality of what holds women back from advancing in the work-place, getting full-time status, etc...

     

    i think this is an issue that divides the middle class. I don't really think child care is an excuse for a single mom. I don't have children so I could be biased. But if you have the drive to succeed you do what you can to  get ahead and grow within a company. Donald trump sleeps 3 hours a night and works 21 hours a day he has been quoted on this. He was a single dad when he was divorced. You never heard him say 'i can't work longer hours because I have no one to watch my children" I know that is sucks that there isn't a work life balance anymore. But if you want to succeed you have to put in the hours. If you don't want your child to be in daycare 9 or 10 hours a day, then you should rethink having children or rethink having a succesful careert. Don't forget they aren't talking about blue collar workers here, we are talking about executive level white collar workers.

  • imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."


    Those statements do bother me, but he said them publicly and wasn't caught on tape saying it. I guess Romney's "47%" statement didn't bother you?

    Romney didn't say that publicly? I thought he was speaking to a crowd. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Let's face it....they all f#ck up.  

    Umm, exactly. What someone does and says privately when they think no one is looking speaks volumes, right?

    So he said this privately in a office setting with a friend? I thought he was speaking in front of a crowd. Gonna Google..

    It was a $50,000/plate fundraiser.  Not exactly the general public.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."


    Those statements do bother me, but he said them publicly and wasn't caught on tape saying it. I guess Romney's "47%" statement didn't bother you?

    Romney didn't say that publicly? I thought he was speaking to a crowd. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Let's face it....they all f#ck up.  

    Umm, exactly. What someone does and says privately when they think no one is looking speaks volumes, right?

    So he said this privately in a office setting with a friend? I thought he was speaking in front of a crowd. Gonna Google..

    Here, because I know you like Youtube - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2gvY2wqI7M

    It's a secretly recorded video of Romney speaking at a fundraiser. How do you not know about this?!


    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageCoffeeBeen:
    imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."


    Those statements do bother me, but he said them publicly and wasn't caught on tape saying it. I guess Romney's "47%" statement didn't bother you?

    Romney didn't say that publicly? I thought he was speaking to a crowd. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Let's face it....they all f#ck up.  

    Umm, exactly. What someone does and says privately when they think no one is looking speaks volumes, right?

    So he said this privately in a office setting with a friend? I thought he was speaking in front of a crowd. Gonna Google..

    It was a $50,000/plate fundraiser.  Not exactly the general public.

    Exactly he said this in front of a crowd. Let's face it they have both effed up with comments from time to time.

    Yes. There are many people who need help from the government and should get help. Let's face it, it's getting out of control. We cannot just print money and continue to pass out food stamps. There are people who abuse and almost 50% is imo a red flag.

  • imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."

    Those statements do bother me, but he said them publicly and wasn't caught on tape saying it. I guess Romney's "47%" statement didn't bother you?

    Romney didn't say that publicly? I thought he was speaking to a crowd. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Let's face it....they all f#ck up.  

    If you f#ck up consistently enough then you're a f#ck up.

    I mean seriously: 47% don't/do matter, women should get in a binder and make my dinner, an abortion ban will/won't be pursued, the middle class/wealthy will/will not see higher taxes, etc. 

    Saying the polar opposite of what you said 5 minutes ago isn't a mistake - the guy is saying whatever is necessary to get elected - who knows what he actually believes in.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagecatsareniice1:
    imageCoffeeBeen:
    imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."


    Those statements do bother me, but he said them publicly and wasn't caught on tape saying it. I guess Romney's "47%" statement didn't bother you?

    Romney didn't say that publicly? I thought he was speaking to a crowd. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Let's face it....they all f#ck up.  

    Umm, exactly. What someone does and says privately when they think no one is looking speaks volumes, right?

    So he said this privately in a office setting with a friend? I thought he was speaking in front of a crowd. Gonna Google..

    It was a $50,000/plate fundraiser.  Not exactly the general public.

    Exactly he said this in front of a crowd. Let's face it they have both effed up with comments from time to time.

    Wow. It was said privately, in that these statements were not televised, he did not know he was being recorded. This was not a stump speech or townhall meeting. It was a private $50K/plate fundraiser.


    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:
    imageCoffeeBeen:
    imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."


    Those statements do bother me, but he said them publicly and wasn't caught on tape saying it. I guess Romney's "47%" statement didn't bother you?

    Romney didn't say that publicly? I thought he was speaking to a crowd. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Let's face it....they all f#ck up.  

    Umm, exactly. What someone does and says privately when they think no one is looking speaks volumes, right?

    So he said this privately in a office setting with a friend? I thought he was speaking in front of a crowd. Gonna Google..

    It was a $50,000/plate fundraiser.  Not exactly the general public.

    Exactly he said this in front of a crowd. Let's face it they have both effed up with comments from time to time.

    Wow. It was said privately, in that these statements were not televised, he did not know he was being recorded. This was not a stump speech or townhall meeting. It was a private $50K/plate fundraiser.

    I'm sorry - but the PUBLIC cannot afford $50,000 for a single dinner.  It was a PRIVATE fundraiser hosted in the home of a hedge fund manager. 

    Cats, it'd be like if you had me over for dinner and said something stupid (not that that would ever happen) and I went around claiming you said it in public.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • sometimes the things you say in "private" are the most true thoughts. Ever hear that a drunks mans words are a sober mans thoughts... kind of the same thing.

    And also, when you are running for president you aren't ever in "private"

  • imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."

    I don't like that Obama said that about guns and religion because I think it sounds ignorant.  But he also didn't follow it up with "...so I'm not worried about them."  So bad, but not as bad as forgetting about 47% of the country because they're not drinking your kool-aid.

    And you're completely missing the point of the second quote.  The point is that businesses aren't built in a vacuum - there's government infrastructure, private support, individual variability, etc.   Unless you're delivering your own mail, on the road that you built, with safety standards that you wrote and you enforced, in the nation that you're single handedly protecting, which you built from scratch in 1776 - then you don't get to complain about this quote.  It's completely valid to say that we're an ecosystem.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageBrina105:

    sometimes the things you say in "private" are the most true thoughts. Ever hear that a drunks mans words are a sober mans thoughts... kind of the same thing.

    And also, when you are running for president you aren't ever in "private"

    Winner winner chicken dinner. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageCoffeeBeen:
    imagecatsareniice1:
    imagePfft:
    imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."

    Those statements do bother me, but he said them publicly and wasn't caught on tape saying it. I guess Romney's "47%" statement didn't bother you?

    Romney didn't say that publicly? I thought he was speaking to a crowd. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Let's face it....they all f#ck up.  

    If you f#ck up consistently enough then you're a f#ck up.

    I mean seriously: 47% don't/do matter, women should get in a binder and make my dinner, an abortion ban will/won't be pursued, the middle class/wealthy will/will not see higher taxes, etc. 

    Saying the polar opposite of what you said 5 minutes ago isn't a mistake - the guy is saying whatever is necessary to get elected - who knows what he actually believes in.

    And, the Obama administration has flip flopped on the situation in Libya. Oh and didn't Obama say he was going to cut the deficit in half.

    Did he cut it in half or even cut it??

  • Seemed like both candidates brought their "A" game, and it was a decent debate. My expectations going in were pretty low, as I'm not a fan of the Town Hall format.

    I personally liked what Obama said a lot more, but for the most part Romney hit his marks and didn't seriously screw up. I imagine most people who liked Obama going in liked Obama going out, those who liked Romney going in liked him coming out, and Undecideds probably weren't really swayed either way. I do imagine some voters swayed by the first debate might shift back into undecided territory. The "Binders Full of Women" comment does seem to have some internet legs, but that may just be people who already hate Romney mocking him.

    I'm going to give Obama a slight win, if only because he got to speak last and took a nice solid jab at Romney on the 47% comment. Definitely wasn't a Knock Out fight on either side though. Willard is a tough debater, even if I think most of his policies are quite silly.

    -My son was born in April 2012. He pretty much rules. -This might be the one place on the internet where it's feasible someone would pretend to be an Adult Man.
  • imageLuckyDad:

    Seemed like both candidates brought their "A" game, and it was a decent debate. My expectations going in were pretty low, as I'm not a fan of the Town Hall format.

    I personally liked what Obama said a lot more, but for the most part Romney hit his marks and didn't seriously screw up. I imagine most people who liked Obama going in liked Obama going out, those who liked Romney going in liked him coming out, and Undecideds probably weren't really swayed either way. I do imagine some voters swayed by the first debate might shift back into undecided territory. The "Binders Full of Women" comment does seem to have some internet legs, but that may just be people who already hate Romney mocking him.

    I'm going to give Obama a slight win, if only because he got to speak last and took a nice solid jab at Romney on the 47% comment. Definitely wasn't a Knock Out fight on either side though. Willard is a tough debater, even if I think most of his policies are quite silly.

    I don't see a problem with him saying this except that it sounded weird. He was making a point that women needed to be hired as well.  

    I hate town hall format too.

  • imageCoffeeBeen:
    imagecatsareniice1:

    Not surprising that dems. would find fault in Romney/see him as close-minded but not think it's a big deal for Obama to make statements like....

     "It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    "If you?ve got a business ? you didn?t build that. Somebody else made that happen."

    I don't like that Obama said that about guns and religion because I think it sounds ignorant.  But he also didn't follow it up with "...so I'm not worried about them."  So bad, but not as bad as forgetting about 47% of the country because they're not drinking your kool-aid.

    And you're completely missing the point of the second quote.  The point is that businesses aren't built in a vacuum - there's government infrastructure, private support, individual variability, etc.   Unless you're delivering your own mail, on the road that you built, with safety standards that you wrote and you enforced, in the nation that you're single handedly protecting, which you built from scratch in 1776 - then you don't get to complain about this quote.  It's completely valid to say that we're an ecosystem.

    Of course there is help in everything most people set to accomplish but to say you didn't BUILD THAT EFF U MR. PRESIDENT!

    There is a lot of blood and sweat that goes into running/starting a business and many LONGGGGG hours.  

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards