Family Matters
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

How do you feel about having babies before being married?

I am not talking about teen pregnancy or anything. Obviously this is something that is close to home but I don't want to post specifics.

I am talking two people who love each other and got pg before they are married. They had (before the pg)  the intentions of getting married, BTW. They are both in their early thirties.

Both sets of their parents are MISERABLE saying things like they were "cheated out of a wedding" and "crushed" and "hurt". All b/c the baby is coming before the wedding. Other comments include "It's too late for a big wedding now" and "they look stupid and foolish."

Is this crazy or is it me? I mean, they have been dating a little under a year, but have known each other for years. But these are grown people with good jobs, two homes between them (meaing they are living in one; renting out the other.)

Is it me, or are ppl being selfish, here? I am totally excited, btw.

«1

Re: How do you feel about having babies before being married?

  • I think it's a bad idea, and not because their parents get 'cheated' out of a big wedding. Children do better when they are brought in to the world as planned, and part of a solid family group; as opposed to being an oops baby that nudged their parents into early unplanned parenthood.

     

    SO SINGS MY SOUL *WHAM!* MY SAVIOR GOD TO THEE *WHAM!* HOW GREAT THOU ART *WHAM!* HOW GREAT THOU ART *WHAM!*
  • I hear you.

    But both things were/are intended, planned. Not really an "oops" but more not quite the order they expected.

    Do I wish they did it in the other order? Yes. But they didn't. So I am not seeing a reason to be MISERABLE over it.

  • p.s. Sue...I agree with you TOTALLY. I want to make that clear.

    I just think ppl are being a little irrational here too. (this situation, not this board...lol)

  • Doesn't bother me, and I have friends - more than one set, actually - who ended up pregnant while engaged. Only one pair is no longer together, the others are doing great. That said, my mother would have the same "it's so horrible!" reaction that they've gotten.
  • I don't think it's cause to be miserable if the cart goes before the horse (if you will). That being said, I am all for marriage then babies. But H and I didn't have sex until after we married because of our beliefs about such things.

     As for if they're being selfish, eh. Could they be more supportive, yes. Maybe they are just really disappointed.

  • I don't think there is anything wrong with any baby "conceived in love,"

    However,

    I DO think that to have a huge wedding when you know that there will be other expenses (home, baby, education savings) is foolish.  I just think there are better uses for your money at that point and you need to plan for your family, not a huge party.

     

  • I agree that the reaction is silly, but I'm old fashioned in this sense - i do think marriage should come first and honestly, I think the disappearance of this standard is one of the reasons (one of MANY reasons) why people jump to having kids so quickly these days.  People dont' think it's a "big deal" to have a kid, even though its a FAR bigger deal and bigger commitment than getting married.
    "Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."
    ~Benjamin Franklin

    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
    DS dx with celiac disease 5/28/10

  • Marriage first, children later.  However, that doesn't mean they lose the right to have the big wedding they dreamed of.  And, I'd be just as happy for their marriage as if they didn't have the baby already.
    imageVisit The Nest! Love to scrapbook!
  • I'm ok with this for other people, but not for myself.
  • My only concern about having a baby before marriage is a legal one.  There are a lot of automatic protections for both parents in the state of marriage and benefits for all involved.

    And honestly, if these two people can't handle the hassling from their parents, I have to wonder about how they will handle an infant. 

  • It depends on the circumstances. Essentially, I believe in the traditional route. Get married, then have babies.

    But if a couple does have a baby first, then gets married, I would scale my wedding back a bit. It would be a lot modern than the traditional model.

  • I agree with PPs that have said it is better when babies come as a part of a marriage, but I also think that people are overreacting here. This is not a great tragedy, and nobody has been cheated out of anything.

    Also - I think my opinion may change a tiny bit depending on the age of the parents.

  • imageSue_sue:

    I think it's a bad idea, and not because their parents get 'cheated' out of a big wedding. Children do better when they are brought in to the world as planned, and part of a solid family group; as opposed to being an oops baby that nudged their parents into early unplanned parenthood.

     

    *insert thumbs-up icon here*
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Generally speaking, I think marriage should come first. I don't believe that you should have kids with someone if you haven't formally committed yourselves to eachother.

    That being said, surprises happen, and I think their parents are being overly dramatic. It's not the end of the world. I think my biggest concern about these situations is that people might get married because they have the child but wouldn't have married otherwise. If these people truly would have married anyway then I don't think it's that big of a deal.

    If I were in this situation (and I knew this was a relationship that would end in marriage) I would probably have a small wedding immediately and forget the big, lavish wedding.

    Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickers Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • I believe that marriage should come before children, and I would be horribly dissapointed in my child if they got knocked up (or knocked someone up) before they were married. And I would be embarrassed of and for them if they continued on with the big fairytale princess wedding after the fact. I don't apologize for feeling that way; perhaps if more people did, and we as a society took parenthood a lot more seriously, we as a society would be way better off.
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers Lilypie Second Birthday tickers
  • I personally feel that children should only be conceived when the parents are emotionally and financially ready and the interested of the unborn child should be the top priority.

    Can an unplanned pregnancy fall under that category? Sure, but it is less likely. 

    Can a child conceived out of wedlock fall under this category? Sure, but I feel like this is also less likely.  

    Your friends seem like they are handling it well. The parents are being overly dramatic if they are using the word MISERABLE regarding this situation.  

    Hope is not a strategy.
  • Thanks guys!

    They are both 31, and while I agree with many of you that the stituation is not "ideal", the parents are being overly dramatic too.

    And it is *me* that is bothered by the reaction, which I am not even exagerating  (remember I am close to the situation). The couple is actually kind of giving every one their space and hoping things will settle.

    Thanks again.

  • Parents are crazy.
    My darling daughter just turned 4 years old.
  • imageEastCoastBride:
    I agree that the reaction is silly, but I'm old fashioned in this sense - i do think marriage should come first and honestly, I think the disappearance of this standard is one of the reasons (one of MANY reasons) why people jump to having kids so quickly these days.  People dont' think it's a "big deal" to have a kid, even though its a FAR bigger deal and bigger commitment than getting married.

    I mostly feel this way, being that these are 2 mature people, I'm sure things will turn out fine. But I see nothing wrong with still valuing marriage before kids as a standard, it's moralistic but a feel like it would be good for our society to hang onto that.

  • I don't think it's any of the parents' business how their 31 year old children want to conduct their lives.  Are they asking their parents for money to help support the baby?  Are they asking to move in with them?  Are they irresponsible and woefully unprepared?  If not, then their parents need to butt out and keep their traps shut if they can't find anything nice or constructive to say.  Cripes.  If they were teenagers that were being supported by their parents that would be a different story, but it really doesn't matter if they, or every person on the Nest, thinks that marriage "should" come first.  In this case, it didn't.  Grow up and deal with it, FFS.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Did they get pregnant accidentally or intentionally?

    accidentally: has happened all the time, since the beginning of time. you cannot blame someone for that. parents need to get over themselves.

    intentionally: if someone is anti-marriage, then yes, clearly I understand. But  two people who obviously believe in marriage and intend to get married to one another in the near future getting pregnant intentionally before getting married ? that's kind of... ridiculous.

    then again, maybe their parents are nuts and they did it intentionally to get out of having a big, ridiculous wedding that would be dictated by their pushy parents. Actually.... that's kind of genius,  I almost wish I would have thought of it...

  • I think the families are being selfish and a little silly over it.

    Yes, marriage is extremely important to me and my beliefs, and I truly believe it's best to be married before starting a family, but I've also been a teen mom and so I've lived the life of having a child before marriage.

    I would accept the fact that the baby's coming and that the wedding will be different but spectacular  none the less. It's about family after all.

  • imageSueBear:

    I don't think there is anything wrong with any baby "conceived in love,"

    However,

    I DO think that to have a huge wedding when you know that there will be other expenses (home, baby, education savings) is foolish.  I just think there are better uses for your money at that point and you need to plan for your family, not a huge party.

     

    This is my train of thought. Call me judgmental, but when I see couples who have the big wedding with showers, bachelor parties, etc., after they've had children, I roll my eyes and think how silly all this looks. Weddings are expensive and self-indulgent. It's my opinion that all that goes out the window when you have children (unless you're a gazillionaire who already has college funds set aside for children).
  • imageMarynJoe:
    Marriage first, children later.  However, that doesn't mean they lose the right to have the big wedding they dreamed of.  And, I'd be just as happy for their marriage as if they didn't have the baby already.

    This. I couldn't have said it better.  

     

  • imageSue_sue:

    I think it's a bad idea, and not because their parents get 'cheated' out of a big wedding. Children do better when they are brought in to the world as planned, and part of a solid family group; as opposed to being an oops baby that nudged their parents into early unplanned parenthood.

     

     

    Considering how high divorce rates are, it doesn't make any difference whether the parents were married prior to conception/birth. Marriage doesn't mean much to most people anymore.

  • Generically speaking, I think it is a bad idea to plan on.  And once it's happened, I think it is silly *not* to get married - immediately if they were already headed that direction.

     

    Specifically to the type of relationship, I think it is silly to have a "grande$$$" wedding rather than, let's plan something simple this weekend (enough notice for MIL/FIL and mom and pop to show up so that they don't feel "cheated"_.  To the grandparents position - as a mother, I would be disappointed in how everything transpired, and while I don't think I would voice my opinion about a wedding being silly or foolish, I'd certainly think so if they still felt the need for a big tado (assuming the big tado was going to be post-baby or months away and/or unnecessarily costly).  I'd be disappointed in myself, however, if not getting a big tado outshone my delight at welcoming a grandbaby....reading the follow up though, I'm not really believing that they are disappointed that they were cheated out of a big wedding day for their child, so much so that the "adults" already have shown a tendency to lack judgement (and who hasn't) but are not taking care of business right now so that they [the adult parents to be] can, in affect, have a party?  I think that might be where the grandparents' "stupid" comments are coming from.

     

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageEastCoastBride:
    I agree that the reaction is silly, but I'm old fashioned in this sense - i do think marriage should come first and honestly, I think the disappearance of this standard is one of the reasons (one of MANY reasons) why people jump to having kids so quickly these days.  People dont' think it's a "big deal" to have a kid, even though its a FAR bigger deal and bigger commitment than getting married.
    I'm absolutely with ECB and others who've said the same thing on this. I'm traditionally minded, I suppose. My answer would be, if you wanted to be married when you had your kid, hop on down to the local city hall and get married before you're too far along (can't you usually figure out you're pregnant at week 7 or so at most?). So get married. You don't have to have the frilly princess day in order to be married - that should be reserved for those who do things in the proper order. Feeling ripped off because you didn't get to do the fancy wedding first is ridiculous - you put yourself in that situation and now you get to be an adult and deal with it in an adult way. So stop whining and get to it.
  • imageMegPlusFive:
    imageSue_sue:

    I think it's a bad idea, and not because their parents get 'cheated' out of a big wedding. Children do better when they are brought in to the world as planned, and part of a solid family group; as opposed to being an oops baby that nudged their parents into early unplanned parenthood.

     

     

    Considering how high divorce rates are, it doesn't make any difference whether the parents were married prior to conception/birth. Marriage doesn't mean much to most people anymore.

    And you don't find that sad?

    I don't aplogize for my "old fashioned" views on marriage and babies. Just because other people have decided that marriage isn't a big deal doesn't mean that I have to go along with it, or encourage my children to.

    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers Lilypie Second Birthday tickers
  • imageJoEsther:
    I'm absolutely with ECB and others who've said the same thing on this. I'm traditionally minded, I suppose. My answer would be, if you wanted to be married when you had your kid, hop on down to the local city hall and get married before you're too far along (can't you usually figure out you're pregnant at week 7 or so at most?). So get married. You don't have to have the frilly princess day in order to be married - that should be reserved for those who do things in the proper order. Feeling ripped off because you didn't get to do the fancy wedding first is ridiculous - you put yourself in that situation and now you get to be an adult and deal with it in an adult way. So stop whining and get to it.

     

    This.  

     

    Especially the "Feeling ripped off because you didn't get to do the fancy wedding first is ridiculous - you put yourself in that situation and now you get to be an adult and deal with it in an adult way. So stop whining and get to it." part.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • It's not that hard to not get pregnant, but if you're in a committed relationship and have decided to marry--- it's not that big of a deal.  I judge the people who are not sure if they're person is worth being legally bound to... but think that same person is they're worth creating a whole new human being with. 
    image
    Currently Reading: Don Quixote by Miguel De Cervantes
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards