Politics & Current Events
Dear Community,

Our tech team has launched updates to The Nest today. As a result of these updates, members of the Nest Community will need to change their password in order to continue participating in the community. In addition, The Nest community member's avatars will be replaced with generic default avatars. If you wish to revert to your original avatar, you will need to re-upload it via The Nest.

If you have questions about this, please email help@theknot.com.

Thank you.

Note: This only affects The Nest's community members and will not affect members on The Bump or The Knot.

Probably flammable, but I want to ask anyways

13468914

Re: Probably flammable, but I want to ask anyways

  • Retarded and gay are slurs against real people who have no choice other than to be who they are.

    Jesusfuckingchrist is just an expression. If you want to go there, it's an expression using the name of a mythical creature, who supposedly ordered you not to use its name on pain of eternal torment - which, if you actually thought the order was true, would be an excellent reason to defy it.

    I don't use religious swear words because the power of a swear word comes from it being a trangressive, shocking word. And unless you buy into ancient mythology as truth, then saying goddammit has as much power as saying potato.

  • image+adamwife+:

    imagebroccolitree:
    Speaking of the meaning of words, ironically I always took the other definition of vain. So this handswringing over how much it hurts you because you're so much more devvout than everyone else is, tome, taking te lord's name in vain. It goes hand in hand with the verses about praying quietly in the closet ratherthan loudly on the street corner. I have no idea what the actual words and their connotations are in the original text, though.

    This is interesting.  I can see how you would interpret it that way.  So do you feel that anyone that is vocal about their faith is doing that?  Should we all be silent about our faith and the way we live it out?  I'm not being snarky or argumentative, I'm just honestly curious about your interpretation.

    Just wanted to say that my intent in posting isn't to appear any more devout than anyone else.  As I've said many times in this thread, I am not without sin.  This is certainly something that I choose not to do (using the Lord's name in vain), but it doesn't mean I am any better than anyone else.  I'm not implying that and I'm sorry if that's how it comes across.

    It's just hard to believe that when you mentioned that "you must have to be a Christian to understand why it's offensive".  I don't have to be black to understand why using the n-word is offensive.  Honestly, it puts me in the mind of those petulant teenagers we all were once who were all "MOM.  You just don't understand.  YOU WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND ANYWAYS BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT ME.  GAWL." *hurr-flips and stormage to rooms commence here*

    image

    If I wanted to hear the pitter-patter of little feet, I'd put shoes on the cat. image

  • Wait does this mean I have to uninvite all of the Jews and Muslims to my Easter party because I'm cooking lamb and pork ribs on the same grill? That would be a shame since the party would be virtually empty without them. Seriously it would just be me and a a gay ex-Mormon. 

    I know a lot of pseudo-kosher keeping Jews and a lot of pork avoiding Muslims. None of them have a problem with other people eating or cooking pork in their presence. Some of them go to joints that cook nothing but pork to hang out with heir less observant friends. I guess I'm lucky that all of my religious friends aren't offended by people not of their religion not following their religious requirements. 

    "We tend to be patronizing about the poor in a very specific sense, which is that we tend to think,
  • imageMare0527:

     

    imagebunnybean:

    I didn't say martyr, Tef, did I?

    I said persecution, which I know she said she didn't feel. She said she feels offended. I can't tell her how to feel. But she also can't tell us how to behave. That's kind of the end, really.

     

    I cringe every time I see some of you post the name of my Savior in vain on here.  I find it incredibly offensive and it almost hurts a little to read it.  I know, I'm probably crossing into overly sensitive, get over it territory, but whatever.

    I'm curious - do some of you realize how offensive it is to say when you say it or is it just out of habit that it comes out?  Does knowing that it is offensive make you think twice about using it in the future?


    I'm curious where exactly there she is telling someone how they should behave?

    Everyone is touting that this is a public message board so they can post whatever they want.... well she can start a thread over whatever she wants.  She made a statment and explained how she feels something and asked for other's input on what she said and instead everyone started attacking her for trying to "ban others' free speech" which I don't see her saying at all.  But whatevs.


    Ok, so my response should then just be, "That's interesting. Thanks for sharing."

    End of thread? 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageDylanite:

    imageTefLepOM:
    who is preaching this?  You know my stance on, say, the r word.  No secret and I gave up that discussion with you long ago.  I was agreeing with what you said as I figured those discussions were why you quoted me and stated "saying one isn't...." sealed that interpretation for me.  I just expanded/discussed what you sounded as if you were laying down.::shrugs::

    Not saying anyone is preaching it right now, but it's relative to the topic and that's where I was coming from. I wasn't making a jab at you, just expanding on the discussion.

    I can take the jab but I was confused.  Sorry for misconstruing and making an assumption. 
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagemxolisi:

    Wait does this mean I have to uninvite all of the Jews and Muslims to my Easter party because I'm cooking lamb and pork ribs on the same grill? That would be a shame since the party would be virtually empty without them. Seriously it would just be me and a a gay ex-Mormon. 

    I know a lot of pseudo-kosher keeping Jews and a lot of pork avoiding Muslims. None of them have a problem with other people eating or cooking pork in their presence. Some of them go to joints that cook nothing but pork to hang out with heir less observant friends. I guess I'm lucky that all of my religious friends aren't offended by people not of their religion not following their religious requirements. 

    Sounds like my kinda party.

    image

    If I wanted to hear the pitter-patter of little feet, I'd put shoes on the cat. image

  • imageNuggetBrain:

    So what, exactly, do you think the purpose of this thread was then?  Just to find out how many people found it offensive?  She could have asked that without the "it makes me cringe" and "it hurts my heart" and "it offends me".  She even said that she wanted people to respect her enough not to use it around her.  So yeah, in a passive-aggressive way she was trying to ask people to stop using it.  You don't need a damn microscope to read between those big-ass lines.

    I figure it was to start a discussion, you know like the majority of the threads on this board are for.

    You can interpret what she said however you want.  Just like I could interpret that sometimes when people say JayEffCee they are purposefully trying to be offensive and inflammatory. 

    Image and video hosting by TinyPicAlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickersAlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • imageNuggetBrain:
    image+adamwife+:

    imagebroccolitree:
    Speaking of the meaning of words, ironically I always took the other definition of vain. So this handswringing over how much it hurts you because you're so much more devvout than everyone else is, tome, taking te lord's name in vain. It goes hand in hand with the verses about praying quietly in the closet ratherthan loudly on the street corner. I have no idea what the actual words and their connotations are in the original text, though.

    This is interesting.  I can see how you would interpret it that way.  So do you feel that anyone that is vocal about their faith is doing that?  Should we all be silent about our faith and the way we live it out?  I'm not being snarky or argumentative, I'm just honestly curious about your interpretation.

    Just wanted to say that my intent in posting isn't to appear any more devout than anyone else.  As I've said many times in this thread, I am not without sin.  This is certainly something that I choose not to do (using the Lord's name in vain), but it doesn't mean I am any better than anyone else.  I'm not implying that and I'm sorry if that's how it comes across.

    It's just hard to believe that when you mentioned that "you must have to be a Christian to understand why it's offensive".  I don't have to be black to understand why using the n-word is offensive.  Honestly, it puts me in the mind of those petulant teenagers we all were once who were all "MOM.  You just don't understand.  YOU WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND ANYWAYS BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT ME.  GAWL." *hurr-flips and stormage to rooms commence here*

    I don't think what I said there is any different than what some athiests said to get the same point across.  Several athiests in this thread said that there is only power in the word if there is belief behind it.  Saying the name of God is no different than saying potato to them, because they don't believe in Him.

    How is that any different than me saying that you probably need to believe in Him in order to understand why it is so offensive?  If you don't believe, you're looking at me thinking "it's just a word like potato, so what's the big deal?"  Obviously people didn't understand why I was offended or they wouldn't be asking.  But I think that if you view God as something sacred and holy, you understand why using the word isn't the same as saying "potato". 

    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers Lilypie Fifth Birthday tickers Lilypie Second Birthday tickers Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • I have no problem with AW because her goal for this post was to share how she and some others find that using the Lord's name in vain is offensive.  She didn't ask anyone to change; she asked for understanding.

    Using the terms "JFC" and GDit" are highly offensive to me, but I know that is my problem and I can't tell others what to do.  Although it is nice if they at least are willing to hear my point of view and respect it, even though they don't agree.

    One thing for AW to understand is that even if many people on here do agree that a word or term is inappropriate or offensive, many will continue to say it anyway, even knowing that it offends others.  We've seen that with the use of "retarded", even after a poll showed that most said they didn't like it being used out of proper context. 

    As far as using the Lord's name in vain, I see it as when we use the words "God" or "Jesus" or "Jesus Christ" when not in prayer or not in respectful discussion.

     

    imageVisit The Nest! Love to scrapbook!
  • image+adamwife+:

    Why do we avoid being offensive sometimes but not always?

    My personal opinion on this is because someone can always be offended by something.  So people cut out what is most offensive to most people (retarded, gay, n-, etc), but aren't going to go around with an ever-expanding list every time one person has a problem with a word.  I won't cater to the overly-sensitive.

    You are in a tiny minority and have given no good reason for it. People don't agree with what taking god's name in vain is, whether it matters coming from a non-believer, etc.  On the other hand, many people like getting to use a good, offensive swear out.  In fact, that's the point.

    So they will continue.  If there was a huge groundswell from people giving reasons as to why this is so offensive, then perhaps you are right and people will eventually stop. 

    Part of the issue too, is that I think it's much easier to see the historical context between the other words being offensive.  I am none of those things, but can see the problem behind them and the hateful way in which they have been used.  Because I don't want to be associated with that prejudicie or someone who is hateful, I won't use those terms.  However, even people that are Christian don't agree on the offensiveness of my swearing JFC!  So I'm not being associated by society as a hateful, ignorant person by using it.  Until that is the case, that is why I will refrain from one and not the other.

    No one person gets to be the "that's offensive" police. 

  • image+adamwife+:
    imageNuggetBrain:
    image+adamwife+:

    imagebroccolitree:
    Speaking of the meaning of words, ironically I always took the other definition of vain. So this handswringing over how much it hurts you because you're so much more devvout than everyone else is, tome, taking te lord's name in vain. It goes hand in hand with the verses about praying quietly in the closet ratherthan loudly on the street corner. I have no idea what the actual words and their connotations are in the original text, though.

    This is interesting.  I can see how you would interpret it that way.  So do you feel that anyone that is vocal about their faith is doing that?  Should we all be silent about our faith and the way we live it out?  I'm not being snarky or argumentative, I'm just honestly curious about your interpretation.

    Just wanted to say that my intent in posting isn't to appear any more devout than anyone else.  As I've said many times in this thread, I am not without sin.  This is certainly something that I choose not to do (using the Lord's name in vain), but it doesn't mean I am any better than anyone else.  I'm not implying that and I'm sorry if that's how it comes across.

    It's just hard to believe that when you mentioned that "you must have to be a Christian to understand why it's offensive".  I don't have to be black to understand why using the n-word is offensive.  Honestly, it puts me in the mind of those petulant teenagers we all were once who were all "MOM.  You just don't understand.  YOU WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND ANYWAYS BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT ME.  GAWL." *hurr-flips and stormage to rooms commence here*

    I don't think what I said there is any different than what some athiests said to get the same point across.  Several athiests in this thread said that there is only power in the word if there is belief behind it.  Saying the name of God is no different than saying potato to them, because they don't believe in Him.

    How is that any different than me saying that you probably need to believe in Him in order to understand why it is so offensive?  If you don't believe, you're looking at me thinking "it's just a word like potato, so what's the big deal?"  Obviously people didn't understand why I was offended or they wouldn't be asking.  But I think that if you view God as something sacred and holy, you understand why using the word isn't the same as saying "potato". 

    Actually, the atheists were saying that TO YOU it was offensive, but TO THEM it was not because of the fact that you have belief in God that they do not have.  In order to find it offensive, you need to have belief in God.  In order to FIND it offensive.  Not in order to UNDERSTAND why it's offensive.  They understand you find it offensive, but they are saying that as far as they're concerned, because they don't share your belief in God, it's not offensive and so just deal.  Nobody said they didn't understand why you found it offensive.

    image

    If I wanted to hear the pitter-patter of little feet, I'd put shoes on the cat. image

  • This is a great discussion and all, and imma let you finish, but CAN I PLEASE DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION BACK TO THE KIDS AND RACE POST?

    Seriously.  Go back and read the last page now.   

  • AW, there are certain polite discourse things you can expect. You can expect us not to belittle your beliefs or say you're crazy. You can expect us to ask you politely about things. Sometimes people don't do this to you. It is very rude, and I find it unacceptable.

    When I say Jesus Effing Christ, I am not thinking about your beliefs, Jesus, or even theoretical historical Jesus. I am trying to find a phrase to punch out what I want to say. 

    If I said you are a mothereffing Christian idiot, then I am being totally offensive and intending to hurt you. That is mean. That is something I wouldn't do to you. That is something I don't think.

    While it isn't always across the board, intent is important. My intent when saying JFC isn't to hurt you or cause you faith anguish. It's just to curse because I like to curse. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Well, from the perspective of historical context, obviously to preach loudly meant you'd be crucified. If enough of the faithful were killed, then sayonara Christianity. Much like all the stuff in the Law from the pentateuch which is charmingly outdated/offensive now, for that matter, heh. Even historically though, the devotion given quietly seem to have much more weight than that done loudly (the parable of the poor widow givingher last coin, for instance). I'd give you more, but I'm on my nook so it'shard to crossreference.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageKnitty:

    Retarded and gay are slurs against real people who have no choice other than to be who they are.

    Jesusfuckingchrist is just an expression. If you want to go there, it's an expression using the name of a mythical creature, who supposedly ordered you not to use its name on pain of eternal torment - which, if you actually thought the order was true, would be an excellent reason to defy it.

    I don't use religious swear words because the power of a swear word comes from it being a trangressive, shocking word. And unless you buy into ancient mythology as truth, then saying goddammit has as much power as saying potato.

    It's just an expression to some, it's extremely offensive to others.

    imageVisit The Nest! Love to scrapbook!
  • I might not type this out right, but I really do get irked when people are so willingly offensive towards Christianity vs. other religious beliefs. Maybe people feel so much more offended by Christianity, but to say that we have mythical beliefs, etc seems to be condescending and one sided.

    A (known) Christian can't go out and say, "Those crazy Muslims and their mystical beliefs!!" w/o getting attacked by someone saying, "Their right to believe in what they will, blah blah" While you might think that their beliefs are based in mythology just the same, the condescension isn't there. I hope that makes sense.

    I don't see people being snarky and saying how cray-cray devout Buddhists, Hindus, etc. Are. Maybe sometimes Scientology or FDLS.

    My point is, I'm totally fine with people thinking my beliefs are mystical mythical crap. However, I respect others rights and beliefs or non-beliefs in a way as to not insult them over their choice in those beliefs or lack there of. 

    So, while there are a ton of Duggar style crazies out there, I feel like this board, including AW, have been really balanced and made efforts not to be offensive. I've personally tried to make a point NOT to insult those who believe differently from me. I don't expect you to stop saying JFC, or Jesus, but when folks are making low insulting jabs at the serious faith of many on this board, it bothers me. 



    Zuma Zoom
    image
  • imageNuggetBrain:
    image+adamwife+:
    imageNuggetBrain:
    image+adamwife+:

    imagebroccolitree:
    Speaking of the meaning of words, ironically I always took the other definition of vain. So this handswringing over how much it hurts you because you're so much more devvout than everyone else is, tome, taking te lord's name in vain. It goes hand in hand with the verses about praying quietly in the closet ratherthan loudly on the street corner. I have no idea what the actual words and their connotations are in the original text, though.

    This is interesting.  I can see how you would interpret it that way.  So do you feel that anyone that is vocal about their faith is doing that?  Should we all be silent about our faith and the way we live it out?  I'm not being snarky or argumentative, I'm just honestly curious about your interpretation.

    Just wanted to say that my intent in posting isn't to appear any more devout than anyone else.  As I've said many times in this thread, I am not without sin.  This is certainly something that I choose not to do (using the Lord's name in vain), but it doesn't mean I am any better than anyone else.  I'm not implying that and I'm sorry if that's how it comes across.

    It's just hard to believe that when you mentioned that "you must have to be a Christian to understand why it's offensive".  I don't have to be black to understand why using the n-word is offensive.  Honestly, it puts me in the mind of those petulant teenagers we all were once who were all "MOM.  You just don't understand.  YOU WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND ANYWAYS BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT ME.  GAWL." *hurr-flips and stormage to rooms commence here*

    I don't think what I said there is any different than what some athiests said to get the same point across.  Several athiests in this thread said that there is only power in the word if there is belief behind it.  Saying the name of God is no different than saying potato to them, because they don't believe in Him.

    How is that any different than me saying that you probably need to believe in Him in order to understand why it is so offensive?  If you don't believe, you're looking at me thinking "it's just a word like potato, so what's the big deal?"  Obviously people didn't understand why I was offended or they wouldn't be asking.  But I think that if you view God as something sacred and holy, you understand why using the word isn't the same as saying "potato". 

    Actually, the atheists were saying that TO YOU it was offensive, but TO THEM it was not because of the fact that you have belief in God that they do not have.  In order to find it offensive, you need to have belief in God.  In order to FIND it offensive.  Not in order to UNDERSTAND why it's offensive.  They understand you find it offensive, but they are saying that as far as they're concerned, because they don't share your belief in God, it's not offensive and so just deal.  Nobody said they didn't understand why you found it offensive.

    I'm arguing that I don't feel they truly do.  If they did understand, I would think they would be inclined to be respectful.  When we truly understand the offensiveness of something, we generally change our behavior.  I can say I understand why a gay person doesn't want me to use the word gay to mean stupid, but if I keep using the word I think it shows that I don't REALLY understand.  Part of understanding is grasping the implications of something.  If you're intentionally trying to be offensive I doubt you grasp those implications. 

    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers Lilypie Fifth Birthday tickers Lilypie Second Birthday tickers Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • imageMarynJoe:

    I have no problem with AW because her goal for this post was to share how she and some others find that using the Lord's name in vain is offensive.  She didn't ask anyone to change; she asked for understanding.

    Using the terms "JFC" and GDit" are highly offensive to me, but I know that is my problem and I can't tell others what to do.  Although it is nice if they at least are willing to hear my point of view and respect it, even though they don't agree.

    One thing for AW to understand is that even if many people on here do agree that a word or term is inappropriate or offensive, many will continue to say it anyway, even knowing that it offends others.  We've seen that with the use of "retarded", even after a poll showed that most said they didn't like it being used out of proper context. 

    As far as using the Lord's name in vain, I see it as when we use the words "God" or "Jesus" or "Jesus Christ" when not in prayer or not in respectful discussion.

     

    Uh.  Wut?  So...she wanted people to just go "Oh.  Okay.  Yes, I understand you find it offensive."  and that's it?  Not to stop using it?  Like I said before, if you want to start a conversation about what's offensive, then do that without making it a personal issue with you.  Going "Hey, I realized that people on here say JFC and as a Christian, I find it offensive.  What do you think society has to do with the role in which words are considered offensive and which aren't?  How do you decide how far you go in trying not to be offensive"?  Not "don't you even care you're being offensive????  It makes me CRINGE.  I hope it gets wiped out eventually.  And let me compare my offendedness with gays as well for good measure."

    Tone, people.  It's all about tone.

    image

    If I wanted to hear the pitter-patter of little feet, I'd put shoes on the cat. image

  • imagebunnybean:

    When I say Jesus Effing Christ, I am not thinking about your beliefs, Jesus, or even theoretical historical Jesus. I am trying to find a phrase to punch out what I want to say. 

    If I said you are a mothereffing Christian idiot, then I am being totally offensive and intending to hurt you. That is mean. That is something I wouldn't do to you. That is something I don't think.

    While it isn't always across the board, intent is important. My intent when saying JFC isn't to hurt you or cause you faith anguish. It's just to curse because I like to curse. 

    I can actually understand all of this.  But I do think some people use JayEffCee to be inflammatory or offensive at times.   

    Image and video hosting by TinyPicAlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickersAlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • imagebunnybean:

    AW, there are certain polite discourse things you can expect. You can expect us not to belittle your beliefs or say you're crazy. You can expect us to ask you politely about things. Sometimes people don't do this to you. It is very rude, and I find it unacceptable.

    When I say Jesus Effing Christ, I am not thinking about your beliefs, Jesus, or even theoretical historical Jesus. I am trying to find a phrase to punch out what I want to say. 

    If I said you are a mothereffing Christian idiot, then I am being totally offensive and intending to hurt you. That is mean. That is something I wouldn't do to you. That is something I don't think.

    While it isn't always across the board, intent is important. My intent when saying JFC isn't to hurt you or cause you faith anguish. It's just to curse because I like to curse. 

    A woman at work said that to me.  Seriously.

    imageVisit The Nest! Love to scrapbook!
  • image+adamwife+:
    imageNuggetBrain:
    image+adamwife+:
    imageNuggetBrain:
    image+adamwife+:

    imagebroccolitree:
    Speaking of the meaning of words, ironically I always took the other definition of vain. So this handswringing over how much it hurts you because you're so much more devvout than everyone else is, tome, taking te lord's name in vain. It goes hand in hand with the verses about praying quietly in the closet ratherthan loudly on the street corner. I have no idea what the actual words and their connotations are in the original text, though.

    This is interesting.  I can see how you would interpret it that way.  So do you feel that anyone that is vocal about their faith is doing that?  Should we all be silent about our faith and the way we live it out?  I'm not being snarky or argumentative, I'm just honestly curious about your interpretation.

    Just wanted to say that my intent in posting isn't to appear any more devout than anyone else.  As I've said many times in this thread, I am not without sin.  This is certainly something that I choose not to do (using the Lord's name in vain), but it doesn't mean I am any better than anyone else.  I'm not implying that and I'm sorry if that's how it comes across.

    It's just hard to believe that when you mentioned that "you must have to be a Christian to understand why it's offensive".  I don't have to be black to understand why using the n-word is offensive.  Honestly, it puts me in the mind of those petulant teenagers we all were once who were all "MOM.  You just don't understand.  YOU WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND ANYWAYS BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT ME.  GAWL." *hurr-flips and stormage to rooms commence here*

    I don't think what I said there is any different than what some athiests said to get the same point across.  Several athiests in this thread said that there is only power in the word if there is belief behind it.  Saying the name of God is no different than saying potato to them, because they don't believe in Him.

    How is that any different than me saying that you probably need to believe in Him in order to understand why it is so offensive?  If you don't believe, you're looking at me thinking "it's just a word like potato, so what's the big deal?"  Obviously people didn't understand why I was offended or they wouldn't be asking.  But I think that if you view God as something sacred and holy, you understand why using the word isn't the same as saying "potato". 

    Actually, the atheists were saying that TO YOU it was offensive, but TO THEM it was not because of the fact that you have belief in God that they do not have.  In order to find it offensive, you need to have belief in God.  In order to FIND it offensive.  Not in order to UNDERSTAND why it's offensive.  They understand you find it offensive, but they are saying that as far as they're concerned, because they don't share your belief in God, it's not offensive and so just deal.  Nobody said they didn't understand why you found it offensive.

    I'm arguing that I don't feel they truly do.  If they did understand, I would think they would be inclined to be respectful.  When we truly understand the offensiveness of something, we generally change our behavior.  I can say I understand why a gay person doesn't want me to use the word gay to mean stupid, but if I keep using the word I think it shows that I don't REALLY understand.  Part of understanding is grasping the implications of something.  If you're intentionally trying to be offensive I doubt you grasp those implications. 

    Listen, if you don't understand that people oftentimes either are intentionally trying to be offensive, or just don't care, then I doubt you grasp the basic concept of humanity.  Seriously.  You seem to think that if they only understood, they'd just stop!  No.  That's not true.  I can completely understand, and just not give a single f*ck about it.

    image

    If I wanted to hear the pitter-patter of little feet, I'd put shoes on the cat. image

  • imageMarynJoe:
    imagebunnybean:

    AW, there are certain polite discourse things you can expect. You can expect us not to belittle your beliefs or say you're crazy. You can expect us to ask you politely about things. Sometimes people don't do this to you. It is very rude, and I find it unacceptable.

    When I say Jesus Effing Christ, I am not thinking about your beliefs, Jesus, or even theoretical historical Jesus. I am trying to find a phrase to punch out what I want to say. 

    If I said you are a mothereffing Christian idiot, then I am being totally offensive and intending to hurt you. That is mean. That is something I wouldn't do to you. That is something I don't think.

    While it isn't always across the board, intent is important. My intent when saying JFC isn't to hurt you or cause you faith anguish. It's just to curse because I like to curse. 

    A woman at work said that to me.  Seriously.

    Well, that woman sucks.  So there's that.

    image

    If I wanted to hear the pitter-patter of little feet, I'd put shoes on the cat. image

  • image+adamwife+:

    I'm arguing that I don't feel they truly do.  If they did understand, I would think they would be inclined to be respectful.  When we truly understand the offensiveness of something, we generally change our behavior.  I can say I understand why a gay person doesn't want me to use the word gay to mean stupid, but if I keep using the word I think it shows that I don't REALLY understand.  Part of understanding is grasping the implications of something.  If you're intentionally trying to be offensive I doubt you grasp those implications. 

    Have you stopped to consider that perhaps people do understand, they just don't respect you and as a result don't really give a flying f*ck if you're upset?

    image
    Who "me?"
  • Here are my random thoughts on this thread in no particular order:

    Props to AW for saying this, she knew there would be a crap storm she didn't care. I love me some AW

    When I say OMG I am thinking Oh my goodness

    I have used the saviors name in an inappropriate way when I am totally outraged by something. Think child rape. However its not appropriate and I am going to watch it. 

    6 pages? I didn't read everything, are folks getting defensive? 

    "HOW many US citizens and ranchers have been decapitated in Arizona by roving bands of paperless aliens, and how will a requirement that I have papers on me make that not happen?"courtesy of SueSue
  • imagebroccolitree:
    Well, from the perspective of historical context, obviously to preach loudly meant you'd be crucified. If enough of the faithful were killed, then sayonara Christianity. Much like all the stuff in the Law from the pentateuch which is charmingly outdated/offensive now, for that matter, heh. Even historically though, the devotion given quietly seem to have much more weight than that done loudly (the parable of the poor widow givingher last coin, for instance). I'd give you more, but I'm on my nook so it'shard to crossreference.

    How do you interpret the passages in the NT that talk about evangelism?  How can we evangelize if we don't talk about our faith?

    Once again, I'm not arguing with you, just trying to understand how you interpret Scripture.

    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers Lilypie Fifth Birthday tickers Lilypie Second Birthday tickers Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • dup

    imageVisit The Nest! Love to scrapbook!
  • imageMarynJoe:
    imagebunnybean:

    If I said you are a mothereffing Christian idiot, then I am being totally offensive and intending to hurt you. That is mean. That is something I wouldn't do to you. That is something I don't think.

    A woman at work said that to me.  Seriously.

    But if she didn't add the mothereffing it isn't offensive.  Because mothers are real people who have been oppressed in the past/present/future.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPicAlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickersAlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • imageMarynJoe:
    imagebunnybean:

    AW, there are certain polite discourse things you can expect. You can expect us not to belittle your beliefs or say you're crazy. You can expect us to ask you politely about things. Sometimes people don't do this to you. It is very rude, and I find it unacceptable.

    When I say Jesus Effing Christ, I am not thinking about your beliefs, Jesus, or even theoretical historical Jesus. I am trying to find a phrase to punch out what I want to say. 

    If I said you are a mothereffing Christian idiot, then I am being totally offensive and intending to hurt you. That is mean. That is something I wouldn't do to you. That is something I don't think.

    While it isn't always across the board, intent is important. My intent when saying JFC isn't to hurt you or cause you faith anguish. It's just to curse because I like to curse. 

    A woman at work said that to me.  Seriously.

    Out of the blue, or because of something you said/did?

     

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • People post things that offend me all the time. Should I share a laundry list so everyone can avoid them? Or does my offense not matter because it isn't rooted in religious belief? I'm not being sarcastic here. I am legitimately offended by some pretty common nestisms and internetisms. 
    "We tend to be patronizing about the poor in a very specific sense, which is that we tend to think,
  • imageMare0527:
    imageMarynJoe:
    imagebunnybean:

    If I said you are a mothereffing Christian idiot, then I am being totally offensive and intending to hurt you. That is mean. That is something I wouldn't do to you. That is something I don't think.

    A woman at work said that to me.  Seriously.

    But if she didn't add the mothereffing it isn't offensive.  Because mothers are real people who have been oppressed in the past/present/future.

    Really?  That's where you're going with this now?  I'm fairly sure calling anybody an idiot regardless of the word they choose to put before it is an attempt to insult them.

    image

    If I wanted to hear the pitter-patter of little feet, I'd put shoes on the cat. image

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards